Plantar fasciitis injury status influences foot mechanics during running.
Foot mechanics
Injury status
Plantar fasciitis
Running gait
Journal
Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)
ISSN: 1879-1271
Titre abrégé: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8611877
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2022
07 2022
Historique:
received:
07
10
2021
revised:
17
06
2022
accepted:
24
06
2022
pubmed:
3
7
2022
medline:
26
7
2022
entrez:
2
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The biomechanical factors related to plantar fasciitis are not well understood. A history of injury is considered a risk factor for subsequent injury, but it is unknown if differences in mechanics exist before, during, and after injury. This study compared gait mechanics among individuals with plantar fasciitis, resolved plantar fasciitis, and uninjured controls. Thirty male and female runners were divided into three groups: 1) plantar fasciitis (n = 10, age 43 ± 11 years); 2) resolved plantar fasciitis (n = 10, age 43 ± 13 years); and 3) control (n = 10, age 38 ± 11 years). Participants ran at preferred velocity and 3.3 m/s while kinematics and kinetics were collected. Variables of interest include vertical loading rate, foot, ankle, knee, and hip kinematics, arch height index, arch rigidity index, and arch drop. Group differences were analyzed at each velocity using one-way analysis of variance. The plantar fasciitis group exhibited less forefoot extension (P = 0.02), more midfoot inversion (P < 0.01), and more midfoot extension (P < 0.01) than the resolved plantar fasciitis group. Foot mechanics in controls did not differ. Sagittal knee range of motion was greater in the plantar fasciitis group than resolved or control (P = 0.01). No other variables were significantly different among groups. The plantar fasciitis group exhibited dynamic foot mechanics which suggest a lower, more flexible arch compared to the resolved group, although static measures of foot structure and ankle motion did not differ. The differences between these groups indicate that the motion of the forefoot and midfoot during gait are important to consider for plantar fasciitis.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The biomechanical factors related to plantar fasciitis are not well understood. A history of injury is considered a risk factor for subsequent injury, but it is unknown if differences in mechanics exist before, during, and after injury. This study compared gait mechanics among individuals with plantar fasciitis, resolved plantar fasciitis, and uninjured controls.
METHODS
Thirty male and female runners were divided into three groups: 1) plantar fasciitis (n = 10, age 43 ± 11 years); 2) resolved plantar fasciitis (n = 10, age 43 ± 13 years); and 3) control (n = 10, age 38 ± 11 years). Participants ran at preferred velocity and 3.3 m/s while kinematics and kinetics were collected. Variables of interest include vertical loading rate, foot, ankle, knee, and hip kinematics, arch height index, arch rigidity index, and arch drop. Group differences were analyzed at each velocity using one-way analysis of variance.
FINDINGS
The plantar fasciitis group exhibited less forefoot extension (P = 0.02), more midfoot inversion (P < 0.01), and more midfoot extension (P < 0.01) than the resolved plantar fasciitis group. Foot mechanics in controls did not differ. Sagittal knee range of motion was greater in the plantar fasciitis group than resolved or control (P = 0.01). No other variables were significantly different among groups.
INTERPRETATION
The plantar fasciitis group exhibited dynamic foot mechanics which suggest a lower, more flexible arch compared to the resolved group, although static measures of foot structure and ankle motion did not differ. The differences between these groups indicate that the motion of the forefoot and midfoot during gait are important to consider for plantar fasciitis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35779463
pii: S0268-0033(22)00142-5
doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105712
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
105712Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.