Dispensing anti-osteoporotic drugs changed during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Alendronate
/ therapeutic use
Bone Density Conservation Agents
/ therapeutic use
Communicable Disease Control
Denosumab
/ therapeutic use
Humans
Osteoporosis
/ drug therapy
Pandemics
Retrospective Studies
Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators
/ therapeutic use
Teriparatide
/ therapeutic use
COVID-19 Drug Treatment
Anti-osteoporotic therapy
Austria
Autoregressive integrated moving average models
COVID-19
Dispensing
Lockdown
Osteoporosis
Journal
Bone
ISSN: 1873-2763
Titre abrégé: Bone
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8504048
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2022
09 2022
Historique:
received:
08
04
2022
revised:
27
05
2022
accepted:
25
06
2022
pubmed:
3
7
2022
medline:
22
7
2022
entrez:
2
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Caring for osteoporosis patients has proven challenging during the COVID-19 pandemic due to repeated lockdowns in Austria. The distinct possibility of insufficient treatment regimens is therefore a matter of pressing concern. The aim of the study was to assess alterations in dispensing anti-osteoporotic drugs during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study was a nationwide retrospective register-based observational study which included all patients in Austria aged ≥50 who received at least one prescription for anti-osteoporotic medication between January 2016 and November 2020. Pseudonymised individual-level patients' data were obtained from social insurance authorities. Anti-osteoporotic agents were divided into: (i) oral bisphosphonates, (ii) intravenous bisphosphonates, (iii) selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), (iv) teriparatide (TPTD) and (v) denosumab (DMAB). We used interrupted time series analysis with autoregressive integrated moving average models (ARIMA) to predict drug dispensing. There were 2,884,374 dispensations of anti-osteoporotic drugs to 224,598 patients between 2016 and 2020. The mean monthly prescriptions for oral bisphosphonates (-14.5 %) and SERMs (-12.9 %) decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic when compared to the non-COVID-19 period. Dispensing for intravenous bisphosphonates (1.7 %) and teriparatide (9.5 %) increased. Prescriptions for DMAB decreased during the first lock-down, however increased by 29.1 % for the total observation time. The Arima models showed that in March 2020 (beginning of the 1st COVID-19 lockdown), there was a decrease of 778 dispensings, with a further increase of 14 dispensings every month for denosumab; a decrease by 178 dispensings, with a further increase of 23 dispensings every month for zolendronic acid; a decrease by 2950 dispensings, but with a further increase of 236 dispensings every other month for ibandronate and a decrease by 1443 dispensing with a further decrease of 29 dispensings for alendronate than predicted, had the lockdown not occurred. The total number of prescriptions dispensed to patients treated with anti-osteoporotic medications declined rapidly during first COVID-19 lockdown. The observed decrease of DMAB during the first lockdown rebounded in the following months. Considering the massive treatment gap for osteoporosis, and the related fracture risk, clinicians should continue treatment, even during a pandemic.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35779846
pii: S8756-3282(22)00154-5
doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2022.116477
pmc: PMC9239920
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bone Density Conservation Agents
0
Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators
0
Teriparatide
10T9CSU89I
Denosumab
4EQZ6YO2HI
Alendronate
X1J18R4W8P
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
116477Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
J Bone Miner Res. 2021 Jun;36(6):1042-1047
pubmed: 33831269
Thromb Haemost. 2020 Jun;120(6):998-1000
pubmed: 32316063
J Bone Miner Res. 2018 Feb;33(2):190-198
pubmed: 29105841
J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 18;10(6):
pubmed: 33803721
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Oct 26;:
pubmed: 33103722
Am J Hematol. 2020 Jul;95(7):834-847
pubmed: 32282949
Osteoporos Int. 2022 Jan;33(1):273-282
pubmed: 34402949
Osteoporos Int. 2020 Jul;31(7):1189-1191
pubmed: 32346775
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Sep 11;69(36):1250-1257
pubmed: 32915166
J Bone Metab. 2021 May;28(2):115-122
pubmed: 34130363
Aging (Albany NY). 2020 Oct 20;12(20):19923-19937
pubmed: 33080571
J Bone Miner Res. 2021 Nov;36(11):2177-2183
pubmed: 34405441
Ann Fam Med. 2022 Jan-Feb;20(1):63-68
pubmed: 34561213
Osteoporos Int. 2022 Jan;33(1):251-261
pubmed: 34417842
Endocrine. 2020 Nov;70(2):203-205
pubmed: 32951069
Pediatrics. 2021 Aug;148(2):
pubmed: 34285080
Osteoporos Int. 2021 Apr;32(4):619-622
pubmed: 33558958
Osteoporos Int. 2021 Jan;32(1):1-6
pubmed: 33146750
J Public Health Res. 2021 Nov 22;11(2):
pubmed: 34814652
Osteoporos Int. 2021 Jun;32(6):1221-1226
pubmed: 33585952
Arch Osteoporos. 2021 Jan 25;16(1):18
pubmed: 33495916
Calcif Tissue Int. 2021 Oct;109(4):351-362
pubmed: 34003337
Osteoporos Int. 2021 Apr;32(4):611-617
pubmed: 33558957
Osteoporos Int. 2021 Jan;32(1):39-46
pubmed: 33057738
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Mar 22;21(1):58
pubmed: 33752604
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Nov 19;106(12):e4795-e4808
pubmed: 34343287
Arch Osteoporos. 2021 Feb 26;16(1):46
pubmed: 33638116
Osteoporos Int. 2020 Sep;31(9):1629-1632
pubmed: 32548787
Osteoporos Int. 2021 Feb;32(2):251-259
pubmed: 32829471