Applying patient characteristics, stent-graft selection, and pre-operative computed tomographic angiography data to a machine learning algorithm: Is endoleak prediction possible?
Algorithms
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
/ diagnostic imaging
Aortography
/ methods
Blood Vessel Prosthesis
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation
Computed Tomography Angiography
Endoleak
/ diagnostic imaging
Endovascular Procedures
Humans
Machine Learning
Stents
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Treatment Outcome
Abdominal aortic aneurysms
Computed tomography
Computed tomography angiography
Endoleaks
Endovascular aneurysm repair
Machine learning
Journal
Radiography (London, England : 1995)
ISSN: 1532-2831
Titre abrégé: Radiography (Lond)
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9604102
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2022
11 2022
Historique:
received:
20
10
2021
revised:
28
05
2022
accepted:
06
06
2022
pubmed:
6
7
2022
medline:
18
10
2022
entrez:
5
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aims to predict endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using machine learning (ML) integration of patient characteristics, stent-graft configuration, and a selection of vessel lengths, diameters and angles measured using pre-operative computed tomography angiography (CTA). We evaluated 1-year follow-up CT scans (arterial and delayed phases) in patients who underwent EVAR for the presence or absence of an endoleak. We also obtained data on the patient characteristics, stent-graft selection, and preoperative CT vessel morphology (diameter, length, and angle). The extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) for the ML system was trained on 30 patients with endoleaks and 81 patients without. We evaluated 5217 items in 111 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms, including the patient characteristics, stent-graft configuration and vascular morphology acquired using pre-EVAR abdominal CTA. We calculated the area under the curve (AUC) of our receiver operating characteristic analysis using the ML method. The AUC, accuracy, 95% confidence interval (CI), sensitivity, and specificity were 0.88, 0.88, 0.79-0.97, 0.85, and 0.91 for ML applying XGBoost, respectively. The diagnostic performance of the ML method was useful when factors such as the patient characteristics, stent-graft configuration and vessel length, diameter and angle of the vessels were considered from pre-EVAR CTA. Based on our findings, we suggest that this is a potential application of ML for the interpretation of abdominal CTA scans in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms scheduled for EVAR.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35785641
pii: S1078-8174(22)00073-6
doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2022.06.004
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
906-911Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.