Can the 5-item Modified Frailty Index Predict Outcomes in Geriatric Trauma? A National Database Study.
Journal
World journal of surgery
ISSN: 1432-2323
Titre abrégé: World J Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7704052
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
accepted:
05
06
2022
pubmed:
6
7
2022
medline:
9
9
2022
entrez:
5
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Frailty results in increased vulnerability to adverse outcomes following trauma. We investigated the association between the 5-item modified frailty index (mFI-5) and outcomes in geriatric trauma patients. The 2011-2016 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was used to study outcomes in patients ≥ 65 years old. The mFI-5 was measured and categorized into no frailty (mFI-5 = 0), moderate frailty (mFI-5 = 0.2), and severe frailty (mFI-5 ≥ 0.4). Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent factors of mortality and complications. 26,963 cases met the inclusion criteria, of whom 25.5% were not frail, 38% were moderately frail, and 36.6% were severely frail. Mean age (± SD) was 76 ± 7 years, 61.5% were male, and 97.8% sustained blunt injuries. Median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 17 (IQR = 10-26), and the median Glasgow Coma Scale was 15 (IQR = 12-15). Overall mortality was 30.6%. Factors independently associated with mortality were age (OR = 1.07 per year, 95%CI 1.06-1.07), blunt trauma (OR = 1.44, 95%CI 1.19 -1.75), ISS (OR = 1.04 per unit increase in ISS, 95%CI 1.03-1.04), and severe frailty (OR = 1.23, 95%CI 1.15-1.32). Interestingly, male sex and GCS appeared to be protective factors with OR of 0.88 (95%CI 0.83 - 0.93) and 0.89 per point change in GCS (95%CI 0.88-0.9), respectively. Moderate (OR = 1.27, 95%CI 1.19-1.25) and severe frailty (OR = 1.49, 95%CI 1.-1.59) were significantly associated with in-hospital complications. Moderate and severe frailty were significant predictors of complications. Only severe frailty was associated with short-term mortality. The mFI-5 can be used as an objective measure to stratify risks in geriatric trauma.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Frailty results in increased vulnerability to adverse outcomes following trauma. We investigated the association between the 5-item modified frailty index (mFI-5) and outcomes in geriatric trauma patients.
METHODS
The 2011-2016 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was used to study outcomes in patients ≥ 65 years old. The mFI-5 was measured and categorized into no frailty (mFI-5 = 0), moderate frailty (mFI-5 = 0.2), and severe frailty (mFI-5 ≥ 0.4). Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent factors of mortality and complications.
RESULTS
26,963 cases met the inclusion criteria, of whom 25.5% were not frail, 38% were moderately frail, and 36.6% were severely frail. Mean age (± SD) was 76 ± 7 years, 61.5% were male, and 97.8% sustained blunt injuries. Median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 17 (IQR = 10-26), and the median Glasgow Coma Scale was 15 (IQR = 12-15). Overall mortality was 30.6%. Factors independently associated with mortality were age (OR = 1.07 per year, 95%CI 1.06-1.07), blunt trauma (OR = 1.44, 95%CI 1.19 -1.75), ISS (OR = 1.04 per unit increase in ISS, 95%CI 1.03-1.04), and severe frailty (OR = 1.23, 95%CI 1.15-1.32). Interestingly, male sex and GCS appeared to be protective factors with OR of 0.88 (95%CI 0.83 - 0.93) and 0.89 per point change in GCS (95%CI 0.88-0.9), respectively. Moderate (OR = 1.27, 95%CI 1.19-1.25) and severe frailty (OR = 1.49, 95%CI 1.-1.59) were significantly associated with in-hospital complications.
CONCLUSION
Moderate and severe frailty were significant predictors of complications. Only severe frailty was associated with short-term mortality. The mFI-5 can be used as an objective measure to stratify risks in geriatric trauma.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35789282
doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06637-3
pii: 10.1007/s00268-022-06637-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2328-2334Informations de copyright
© 2022. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.
Références
Lee H, Tan C, Tran V et al (2020) The utility of the modified frailty index in outcome prediction for elderly patients with acute traumatic subdural hematoma. J Neurotrauma 37(23):2499–2506. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2019.6943
doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6943
pubmed: 32349611
Lee L, Patel T, Hillier LM, Maulkhan N, Slonim K, Costa A (2017) Identifying frailty in primary care: a systematic review. Geriatr Gerontol Int 17(10):1358–1377. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12955
doi: 10.1111/ggi.12955
pubmed: 28401737
Lustenberger T, Inaba K, Schnüriger B et al (2011) Gunshot injuries in the elderly: patterns and outcomes A national trauma databank analysis. World J Surg 35(3):528–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0920-7
doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0920-7
pubmed: 21203760
Rege RM, Runner RP, Staley CA, Vu CCL, Arora SS, Schenker ML (2018) Frailty predicts mortality and complications in chronologically young patients with traumatic orthopaedic injuries. Injury 49(12):2234–2238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.08.017
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.08.017
pubmed: 30274754
Traven SA, Reeves RA, Sekar MG, Slone HS, Walton ZJ (2019) New 5-factor modified frailty index predicts morbidity and mortality in primary hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 34(1):140–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.040
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.040
pubmed: 30337252
Subramaniam S. New 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index Using American College of Surgeons NSQIP Data. Published online 2012:17.
Chimukangara M, Helm MC, Frelich MJ et al (2017) A 5-item frailty index based on NSQIP data correlates with outcomes following paraesophageal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 31(6):2509–2519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5253-7
doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5253-7
pubmed: 27699515
Velanovich V, Antoine H, Swartz A, Peters D, Rubinfeld I (2013) Accumulating deficits model of frailty and postoperative mortality and morbidity: its application to a national database. J Surg Res 183(1):104–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2013.01.021
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.01.021
pubmed: 23415494
Subramaniam S, Aalberg JJ, Soriano RP, Divino CM. The 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index in the Geriatric Surgical Population. The American Surgeon. Published online December 30, 2020:000313482095243. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003134820952438
Tracy BM, Wilson JM, Smith RN, Schenker ML, Gelbard RB (2020) The 5-Item Modified Frailty Index Predicts Adverse Outcomes in Trauma. J Surg Res 253:167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.03.052
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.03.052
pubmed: 32361611
Victorino GP (2003) Trauma in the elderly patient. Arch Surg 138(10):1093. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.138.10.1093
doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.10.1093
pubmed: 14557126
Joseph B, Pandit V, Zangbar B et al (2014) Superiority of frailty over age in predicting outcomes among geriatric trauma patients: a prospective analysis. JAMA Surg 149(8):766. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2014.296
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.296
pubmed: 24920308
Hamidi M, Zeeshan M, Leon-Risemberg V et al (2019) Frailty as a prognostic factor for the critically ill older adult trauma patients. The American J Surg 218(3):484–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.01.035
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.01.035
Palmer J, Pandit V, Zeeshan M et al (2019) The acute inflammatory response after trauma is heightened by frailty: a prospective evaluation of inflammatory and endocrine system alterations in frailty. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 87(1):54–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000002229
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002229
pubmed: 30768559
Sampalis JS, Nathanson R, Vaillancourt J et al (2009) Assessment of mortality in older trauma patients sustaining injuries from falls or motor vehicle collisions treated in regional level I trauma centers. Ann Surg 249(3):488–495. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819a8b4f
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819a8b4f
pubmed: 19247039
Wilberger JE, Harris M, Diamond DL (1991) Acute subdural hematoma: morbidity, mortality, and operative timing. J Neurosurg 74(2):212–218. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1991.74.2.0212
doi: 10.3171/jns.1991.74.2.0212
pubmed: 1988590
Hollis S, Lecky F, Yates DW, Woodford M (2006) The effect of pre-existing medical conditions and age on mortality after injury. J Trauma 61(5):1255–1260. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000243889.07090.da
doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000243889.07090.da
pubmed: 17099538
Hashmi A, Ibrahim-Zada I, Rhee P et al (2014) Predictors of mortality in geriatric trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 76(3):894–901. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab0763
doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab0763
pubmed: 24553567
Liu Y, Sinha I, Aluthge DP, Wills HE (2018) Injury severity score predicts mortality less accurately with increasing age: analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank. J Am Coll Surg 227(4):S152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.07.322
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.07.322
Yeung JHH, Chang ALM, Ho W et al (2008) High risk trauma in older adults in Hong Kong: a multicentre study. Injury 39(9):1034–1041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2008.03.017
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.03.017
pubmed: 18667201
Bouamra O, Wrotchford A, Hollis S, Vail A, Woodford M, Lecky F (2006) A new approach to outcome prediction in trauma: a comparison with the TRISS model. J Trauma 61(3):701–710. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000197175.91116.10
doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000197175.91116.10
pubmed: 16967011
Kahl JE, Calvo RY, Sise MJ, Sise CB, Thorndike JF, Shackford SR (2013) The changing nature of death on the trauma service. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 75(2):195–201. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3182997865
doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182997865
pubmed: 23823614