Tessier cranio-facial clefts presenting to a tertiary eye care center in Northern India: Ophthalmic features and a review of management.
Abortive cryptophthalmos
Fraser syndrome
complete cryptophthalmos
eyelid developmental disorder
syndactyly
Journal
Indian journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1998-3689
Titre abrégé: Indian J Ophthalmol
Pays: India
ID NLM: 0405376
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2022
07 2022
Historique:
entrez:
6
7
2022
pubmed:
7
7
2022
medline:
8
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Tessier classification is used to classify congenital facial cleft disorders utilizing the anatomical location of the cleft and its extension. The orbital and ocular morbidities associated with the birth disorder are numerous. The authors decided to perform a retrospective analysis of the clinical features of the patients who presented to a tertiary care hospital with orbito-cranial clefts. The authors retrospectively evaluated the records of patients with craniofacial clefts who had presented to a tertiary eye care hospital in northern India in the last 2 years (January 2019-December 2020). The clinical features were studied, entered in MS Excel, and the data were evaluated. The data of 40 patients with Tessier cleft were found. The majority of the patients were male and presented in the pediatric age group. Unilateral involvement was more common, with maxillary hypoplasia being the most common facial anomaly associated. Eyelid coloboma and euryblepharon was the most common periocular finding; lateral epibulbar dermoid and corneal opacity were the most common ocular surface anomaly. The majority of patients had presented for cosmetic correction. The syndromic association was with Goldenhar syndrome (n = 13), Fraser (n = 2), and one each of Treacher Collins, blepharocheilodontic, organoid nevus, and oculo-dento-digital syndrome. Combined clefts were also seen. Tessier cleft classification is a useful tool to classify cranio-facial left anomalies. Multitudes of ocular and orbital anomalies can be associated with their different forms. Better knowledge and understanding of the classification will aid immensely in predicting the ocular defects and planning their management.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35791155
pii: IndianJOphthalmol_2022_70_7_2552_349186
doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_86_22
pmc: PMC9426171
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2552-2558Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None
Références
J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Jun;31(4):945-949
pubmed: 32118663
Plast Reconstr Surg (1946). 1953 Jan;11(1):36-8
pubmed: 13026427
Eye (Lond). 2017 Aug;31(8):1140-1145
pubmed: 28304389
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Jul;28(5):e467-e470
pubmed: 28678141
J Craniofac Surg. 1996 Nov;7(6):408-11
pubmed: 10332258
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Sep 1;114(3):640-7
pubmed: 15318038
Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1949;27(2):143-224
pubmed: 18142195
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2000 Sep;18(3):87-9
pubmed: 11324202
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Sep/Oct;35(5):491-494
pubmed: 30865066
Indian J Plast Surg. 2019 May;52(2):250-251
pubmed: 31602145
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019 Apr;56(4):514-520
pubmed: 30045630
J Craniofac Surg. 2008 Sep;19(5):1348-52
pubmed: 18812861
J Maxillofac Surg. 1976 Jun;4(2):69-92
pubmed: 820824
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar;31(2):NP12-NP14
pubmed: 31771345
Indian Pediatr. 2009 Oct;46(10):907
pubmed: 19887699
Ann Dermatol. 2012 Nov;24(4):464-7
pubmed: 23197915