Systemic treatment of children and adolescents with atopic dermatitis aged ≥2 years: a Delphi consensus project mapping expert opinion in Northern Europe.
Adolescent
Azathioprine
/ therapeutic use
Biological Products
/ therapeutic use
Child
Child, Preschool
Cyclosporine
/ therapeutic use
Delphi Technique
Dermatitis, Atopic
/ therapy
Expert Testimony
Humans
Janus Kinase Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Janus Kinases
Methotrexate
/ therapeutic use
Mycophenolic Acid
/ therapeutic use
Quality of Life
Journal
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV
ISSN: 1468-3083
Titre abrégé: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9216037
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2022
Nov 2022
Historique:
received:
18
01
2022
accepted:
14
06
2022
pubmed:
7
7
2022
medline:
15
10
2022
entrez:
6
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Paediatric atopic dermatitis (AD) can be burdensome, affecting mental health and impairing quality of life for children and caregivers. Comprehensive guidelines exist for managing paediatric AD, but practical guidance on using systemic therapy is limited, particularly for new therapies including biologics and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, recently approved for various ages in this indication. This expert consensus aimed to provide practical recommendations within this advancing field to enhance clinical decision-making on the use of these and other systemics for children and adolescents aged ≥2 years with moderate-to-severe AD. Nineteen physicians from Northern Europe were selected for their expertise in managing childhood AD. Using a two-round Delphi process, they reached full or partial consensus on 37 statements. Systemic therapy is recommended for children aged ≥2 years with a clear clinical diagnosis of severe AD and persistent disease uncontrolled after optimizing non-systemic therapy. Systemic therapy should achieve long-term disease control and reduce short-term interventions. Recommended are cyclosporine A for short-term use (all ages) and dupilumab or methotrexate for long-term use (ages ≥6 years). Consensus was not reached on the best long-term systemics for children aged 2-6 years, although new systemic therapies will likely become favourable: New biologics and JAK inhibitors will soon be approved for this age group, and more trial and real-world data will become available. This article makes practical recommendations on the use of systemic AD treatments for children and adolescents, to supplement international and regional guidelines. It considers the systemic medication that was available for children and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD at the time this consensus project was done: azathioprine, cyclosporine A, dupilumab, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil and oral glucocorticosteroids. We focus on the geographically similar Northern European countries, whose healthcare systems, local preferences for AD management and reimbursement structures nonetheless differ significantly.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Paediatric atopic dermatitis (AD) can be burdensome, affecting mental health and impairing quality of life for children and caregivers. Comprehensive guidelines exist for managing paediatric AD, but practical guidance on using systemic therapy is limited, particularly for new therapies including biologics and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, recently approved for various ages in this indication.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
This expert consensus aimed to provide practical recommendations within this advancing field to enhance clinical decision-making on the use of these and other systemics for children and adolescents aged ≥2 years with moderate-to-severe AD.
METHODS
METHODS
Nineteen physicians from Northern Europe were selected for their expertise in managing childhood AD. Using a two-round Delphi process, they reached full or partial consensus on 37 statements.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Systemic therapy is recommended for children aged ≥2 years with a clear clinical diagnosis of severe AD and persistent disease uncontrolled after optimizing non-systemic therapy. Systemic therapy should achieve long-term disease control and reduce short-term interventions. Recommended are cyclosporine A for short-term use (all ages) and dupilumab or methotrexate for long-term use (ages ≥6 years). Consensus was not reached on the best long-term systemics for children aged 2-6 years, although new systemic therapies will likely become favourable: New biologics and JAK inhibitors will soon be approved for this age group, and more trial and real-world data will become available.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This article makes practical recommendations on the use of systemic AD treatments for children and adolescents, to supplement international and regional guidelines. It considers the systemic medication that was available for children and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD at the time this consensus project was done: azathioprine, cyclosporine A, dupilumab, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil and oral glucocorticosteroids. We focus on the geographically similar Northern European countries, whose healthcare systems, local preferences for AD management and reimbursement structures nonetheless differ significantly.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35793471
doi: 10.1111/jdv.18410
pmc: PMC9796032
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biological Products
0
Janus Kinase Inhibitors
0
Cyclosporine
83HN0GTJ6D
Janus Kinases
EC 2.7.10.2
Mycophenolic Acid
HU9DX48N0T
Azathioprine
MRK240IY2L
Methotrexate
YL5FZ2Y5U1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2153-2165Subventions
Organisme : Sanofi Genzyme
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.
Références
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2021 Feb;32(2):331-341
pubmed: 33047404
Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2020 Feb;37(1):1-10
pubmed: 32467676
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2022 Jan;33(1):e13693
pubmed: 34726312
Trials. 2017 Feb 27;18(1):87
pubmed: 28241851
Br J Dermatol. 2020 May;182(5):1269-1276
pubmed: 31392722
Acta Derm Venereol. 2021 Feb 17;101(2):adv00402
pubmed: 33491094
Pediatr Dermatol. 2019 Jan;36(1):100-104
pubmed: 30338542
Acta Derm Venereol. 2020 Sep 16;100(16):adv00264
pubmed: 32926175
Drugs R D. 2021 Sep;21(3):341-350
pubmed: 34106430
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2007 May;21(5):606-19
pubmed: 17447974
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018 Jun;32(6):850-878
pubmed: 29878606
Pediatr Dermatol. 2013 Mar-Apr;30(2):199-206
pubmed: 23461685
J Ultrasound Med. 2015 Sep;34(9):1621-30
pubmed: 26269292
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022 Aug;87(2):474-476
pubmed: 34688824
Dermatol Res Pract. 2020 Apr 07;2020:1524293
pubmed: 32318104
Mod Rheumatol. 2022 Jul 1;32(4):776-782
pubmed: 34918139
Drugs. 2020 Jul;80(11):1041-1052
pubmed: 32519223
J Dermatolog Treat. 2015 Feb;26(1):83-9
pubmed: 24552300
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Jun;33(6):1124-1132
pubmed: 30720903
Pediatrics. 2018 Oct;142(4):
pubmed: 30266868
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018 Dec;32(12):2074-2082
pubmed: 30288799
Br J Dermatol. 2019 Nov;181(5):895-906
pubmed: 30758843
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018 May;32(5):657-682
pubmed: 29676534
Acta Derm Venereol. 2020 Jan 7;100(1):adv00015
pubmed: 31709450
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Feb;80(2):411-416.e4
pubmed: 30296535
Br J Dermatol. 2021 Feb;184(2):304-309
pubmed: 33006135
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Oct;77(4):623-633
pubmed: 28803668
J Invest Dermatol. 2017 Jan;137(1):18-25
pubmed: 27771048
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2013 Sep;24(6):527-39
pubmed: 23980845
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Dec;83(6):e403-e404
pubmed: 32171809
Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Aug;60(8):984-92
pubmed: 16893440
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 14;6(10):e012637
pubmed: 27742629
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Nov - Dec;5(6):1519-1531
pubmed: 28970084
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2020 Oct;18(10):1085-1092
pubmed: 32666644
J Asthma Allergy. 2021 Jun 01;14:595-607
pubmed: 34103945
Int J Womens Dermatol. 2021 Jul 22;7(5Part B):708-715
pubmed: 35028369
Allergy. 2021 Apr;76(4):988-1009
pubmed: 33538044
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018 Dec;19(6):821-838
pubmed: 30168085
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Dec;83(6):1681-1687
pubmed: 32171815
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Jan;143(1):46-55
pubmed: 30458183
Ital J Pediatr. 2016 Mar 02;42:26
pubmed: 26936273
J Invest Dermatol. 2021 Jan;141(1):191-193.e2
pubmed: 32540248
Allergy. 2021 Jan;76(1):407-410
pubmed: 33064851
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012 Sep;26(9):1176-93
pubmed: 22813359
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Dec;34(12):2717-2744
pubmed: 33205485
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Jan;75(1):45-59
pubmed: 22519685
Curationis. 2015 Apr 29;38(1):
pubmed: 26017685
Clin Exp Allergy. 2018 Jan;48(1):48-59
pubmed: 29143385
Pediatr Dermatol. 2013 May-Jun;30(3):329-34
pubmed: 23406346
JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Oct 1;153(10):1036-1042
pubmed: 28724128
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Feb;131(2):428-33
pubmed: 23245818