Medicaid professional fees for treatment of opioid use disorder varied widely across states and were substantially below fees paid by medicare in 2021.

Federal policy Medicaid Medicare reimbursement Methadone treatment Opioid use disorder State policy

Journal

Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy
ISSN: 1747-597X
Titre abrégé: Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101258060

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 07 2022
Historique:
accepted: 07 06 2022
entrez: 6 7 2022
pubmed: 7 7 2022
medline: 9 7 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

As Medicaid is the largest payer for opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment services in the United States, information about Medicaid provider reimbursement is critical, and Medicaid payment policies influence the structure of OUD treatment services for everyone with OUD treatment needs. We collected Medicaid professional fees for OUD treatment and related services for the District of Columbia and fifty state Medicaid programs and the Medicare program in 2021. We create three fee indexes related to OUD treatment, with an emphasis on services related to first-line medication treatments in outpatient settings. We then create Medicaid fee indexes and Medicaid-to-Medicare fee indexes. Weekly Medicaid fee bundles for methadone treatment at OTPs in 2021 varied widely, more than 4-fold across states. The Medicaid-to-Medicare fee index shows that the national average Medicaid fee bundle was 56 percent of Medicare fees for regular methadone treatment at OTPs in 2021. For services related to OUD treatment, Medicaid fees varied up to 5-fold and larger across the components of each of the four services, and Medicaid fees were low relative to Medicare for almost all state services examined. The Medicaid-to-Medicare fee index was 64 percent of Medicare fees in 2021, ranging from 52 percent for evaluation & management to 76 percent for toxicology testing. There appears to be little justification for such large variation in Medicaid fees across states. In addition, the generally low fees in Medicaid persist despite recent efforts to increase access to opioid use disorder treatment for Medicaid enrollees, and have important implications for access to life-saving treatment during the current opioid overdose crisis.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
As Medicaid is the largest payer for opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment services in the United States, information about Medicaid provider reimbursement is critical, and Medicaid payment policies influence the structure of OUD treatment services for everyone with OUD treatment needs.
METHODS
We collected Medicaid professional fees for OUD treatment and related services for the District of Columbia and fifty state Medicaid programs and the Medicare program in 2021. We create three fee indexes related to OUD treatment, with an emphasis on services related to first-line medication treatments in outpatient settings. We then create Medicaid fee indexes and Medicaid-to-Medicare fee indexes.
RESULTS
Weekly Medicaid fee bundles for methadone treatment at OTPs in 2021 varied widely, more than 4-fold across states. The Medicaid-to-Medicare fee index shows that the national average Medicaid fee bundle was 56 percent of Medicare fees for regular methadone treatment at OTPs in 2021. For services related to OUD treatment, Medicaid fees varied up to 5-fold and larger across the components of each of the four services, and Medicaid fees were low relative to Medicare for almost all state services examined. The Medicaid-to-Medicare fee index was 64 percent of Medicare fees in 2021, ranging from 52 percent for evaluation & management to 76 percent for toxicology testing.
CONCLUSIONS
There appears to be little justification for such large variation in Medicaid fees across states. In addition, the generally low fees in Medicaid persist despite recent efforts to increase access to opioid use disorder treatment for Medicaid enrollees, and have important implications for access to life-saving treatment during the current opioid overdose crisis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35794626
doi: 10.1186/s13011-022-00478-y
pii: 10.1186/s13011-022-00478-y
pmc: PMC9257570
doi:

Substances chimiques

Methadone UC6VBE7V1Z

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

49

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Nov;2(11):
pubmed: 35647581
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e1920622
pubmed: 32022884
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Feb;40(2):343-348
pubmed: 33523743
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Nov 1;204:107527
pubmed: 31525570
JAMA. 2020 Dec 15;324(23):2440-2442
pubmed: 33320214
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Jun;60(6):850-855
pubmed: 33812694
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Oct;129:108384
pubmed: 34080552
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Dec;83:27-35
pubmed: 29129193
Am J Public Health. 2021 Jul;111(7):1284-1291
pubmed: 33856885

Auteurs

Lisa Clemans-Cope (L)

Health Policy Center at Urban Institute, 500 L'Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, DC, 20024, USA. lclemans@urban.org.

Victoria Lynch (V)

Health Policy Center at Urban Institute, 500 L'Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, DC, 20024, USA.

Maya Payton (M)

Health Policy Center at Urban Institute, 500 L'Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, DC, 20024, USA.

Joshua Aarons (J)

Economics at UC San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr. #0508, Mail Code: 0508, La Jolla, California, 92093, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH