Effects of LED supplemental lighting on the growth and metabolomic profile of Taxus baccata cultivated in a smart greenhouse.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
10
11
2021
accepted:
25
03
2022
entrez:
8
7
2022
pubmed:
9
7
2022
medline:
14
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Light emitting diode (LED) lamps are increasingly being studied in cultivation of horticultural, ornamental and medicinal plants as means to increase yield, quality, stress resistance, and bioactive compounds content. Enhancing the production of metabolites for medicinal or pharmaceutical use by regulating LED intensity and spectra is a challenging subject, where promising results have been achieved. Nevertheless, some species have been poorly investigated, despite their interest as a source of medicinally active substances, with particular reference to LED effects at the plant cultivation level. This study evaluates the effects of supplementary top-light LED treatments on Taxus baccata, one of the main sources of taxane precursors. Blue, red and mixed red-and-blue spectra were tested at 100 μM m-2 s-1. Moreover, 50 and 150 μM m-2 s-1 intensities were tested for the mixed spectrum. All treatments were set for 14 hours a day and were tested against natural light as control treatment, in a controlled environment, from 19 August to 9 December 2019, this latter date representing 112 days after treatment (DAT) began. A smart monitoring and control system powered by environmental and proximal sensors was implemented to assure homogeneity of temperature, humidity, and base natural light for all the treatments. It resulted in negligible deviations from expected values and reliable exclusion of confusing factors. Biometric measurements and 1H-NMR based metabolomic analysis were performed to investigate growth and phytochemical profile throughout the trial. One-way ANOVA showed that supplemental LED lighting increased plant height and number of sprouts. Considering the mixed red-and-blue spectrum, plant height increased almost proportionally from control to 100 μM m-2 s-1 (+20% at 112 DAT), with no further increase at higher intensity. The number of sprouts was strongly enhanced by LED treatments only in the early phase (48.9 vs. 7.5 sprouts in the averaged 50, 100 and 150 μM m-2 s-1 vs. the control at 28 DAT), with no differences related to intensity in the very early stage, and more persisting effects (up to 56 DAT) for higher intensities. After the very early growth stages (28 DAT), plant vigor showed a modest although significant increase over time compared to the control, with no differences related to light intensity (0.81 vs. 0.74 of NDVI in the averaged 50, 100 and 150 μM m-2 s-1 vs. the control, across 56, 84 and 112 DAT). The different spectra tested at 100 μM m-2 s-1 showed no significant differences in growth parameters, except for a slight beneficial influence of blue (alone or with red) compared to only red for sprouting. According to the metabolomic analysis, treated plants at 28 DAT were characterized by the highest content of sucrose and aromatic compounds. Signals of a putative taxane were detected in the 1H NMR profiles of plants, which were compared to the spectrum of baccatin III standard. However, the intensity of these spectral signals was not affected by the treatment, while they increased only slightly during time. Light at 150 μM m-2 s-1 induced the strongest variation in the metabolome. Conversely, light composition did not induce significant differences in the metabolome.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35802666
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266777
pii: PONE-D-21-35838
pmc: PMC9269924
doi:
Substances chimiques
Taxoids
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0266777Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Sci Rep. 2019 May 6;9(1):6926
pubmed: 31061448
Planta. 1979 Jan;145(3):253-8
pubmed: 24317731
Tree Physiol. 1998 Nov;18(11):749-757
pubmed: 12651409
Molecules. 2018 Mar 27;23(4):
pubmed: 29584636
Molecules. 2017 Aug 27;22(9):
pubmed: 28846620
Plant Physiol. 1979 Dec;64(6):1015-21
pubmed: 16661084
J Agric Food Chem. 2021 Jan 27;69(3):1132-1145
pubmed: 33459558
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2020 Sep 10;189:113456
pubmed: 32653816
PeerJ. 2018 Jul 19;6:e5274
pubmed: 30038873
Plant Sci. 2011 Sep;181(3):282-7
pubmed: 21763539
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Oct 24;18(11):
pubmed: 30352969
J Photochem Photobiol B. 2014 Jan 5;130:264-71
pubmed: 24362323
J Plant Physiol. 2019 Jun;237:120-128
pubmed: 31078909
Planta. 1984 May;161(2):129-36
pubmed: 24253600