150-cm Versus 200-cm Biliopancreatic Limb One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
150-cm biliopancreatic limb length
200-cm biliopancreatic limb
Mini gastric bypass
Nutritional deficiencies
One-anastomosis gastric bypass
Weight loss
Journal
Obesity surgery
ISSN: 1708-0428
Titre abrégé: Obes Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9106714
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2022
09 2022
Historique:
received:
02
04
2022
accepted:
04
07
2022
revised:
01
07
2022
pubmed:
9
7
2022
medline:
24
8
2022
entrez:
8
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
It has been suggested that shortening the length of the biliopancreatic limb (BPL) to 150 cm in one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) would reduce nutritional complication rates without impairing weight loss outcomes. The aim of this study is to compare patients who underwent OAGB with a 200-cm BPL (OAGB-200) to patients with OAGB with a 150-cm BPL (OAGB-150) in terms of weight loss and late morbidity. This is a monocentric retrospective matched cohort study including patients with a body mass index between 35 and 50 kg/m In total, 784 patients who underwent OAGB were included (OAGB-150 n = 392 and OAGB-200 (n = 392). There was no significant difference in terms of early morbidity. Regarding late morbidity in patients with an OAGB-150, significantly lower rates for marginal ulcer (OR = 0.4, CI 95% [0.2; 0.8], p = 0.006), incisional hernia (OR = 0.5, CI 95% [0.3; 1], p = 0.041), and bowel obstruction (OR = 0.3, CI 95% [0.1; 0.9], p = 0.039) were reported. Likewise, regarding late nutritional deficiencies, post-OAGB-150, a significantly lower number of patients with hypoalbuminemia (OR = 0.3, CI 95% [0.2; 0.7], p = 0.006), low vitamin B9 (OR = 0.5, CI 95% [0.2; 1], p = 0.044), and low ferritin (OR = 0.5, CI 95% [0.3; 0.8], p = 0.005) were observed. There was no significant difference in the percentage of excess BMI loss at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years. Compared to OAGB-200 in patients with BMI ≤ 50 kg/m
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
It has been suggested that shortening the length of the biliopancreatic limb (BPL) to 150 cm in one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) would reduce nutritional complication rates without impairing weight loss outcomes. The aim of this study is to compare patients who underwent OAGB with a 200-cm BPL (OAGB-200) to patients with OAGB with a 150-cm BPL (OAGB-150) in terms of weight loss and late morbidity.
METHODS
This is a monocentric retrospective matched cohort study including patients with a body mass index between 35 and 50 kg/m
RESULTS
In total, 784 patients who underwent OAGB were included (OAGB-150 n = 392 and OAGB-200 (n = 392). There was no significant difference in terms of early morbidity. Regarding late morbidity in patients with an OAGB-150, significantly lower rates for marginal ulcer (OR = 0.4, CI 95% [0.2; 0.8], p = 0.006), incisional hernia (OR = 0.5, CI 95% [0.3; 1], p = 0.041), and bowel obstruction (OR = 0.3, CI 95% [0.1; 0.9], p = 0.039) were reported. Likewise, regarding late nutritional deficiencies, post-OAGB-150, a significantly lower number of patients with hypoalbuminemia (OR = 0.3, CI 95% [0.2; 0.7], p = 0.006), low vitamin B9 (OR = 0.5, CI 95% [0.2; 1], p = 0.044), and low ferritin (OR = 0.5, CI 95% [0.3; 0.8], p = 0.005) were observed. There was no significant difference in the percentage of excess BMI loss at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years.
CONCLUSION
Compared to OAGB-200 in patients with BMI ≤ 50 kg/m
Identifiants
pubmed: 35804236
doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06203-9
pii: 10.1007/s11695-022-06203-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2839-2845Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. similarities and disparities among the 5 IFSO Chapters. Obes Surg. 2018;2021:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05207-7 .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05207-7
Rutledge R. The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1,274 cases. Obes Surg. 2001;11:276–80. https://doi.org/10.1381/096089201321336584 .
doi: 10.1381/096089201321336584
pubmed: 11433900
Chevallier JM, Arman GA, Guenzi M, et al. One thousand single anastomosis (omega loop) gastric bypasses to treat morbid obesity in a 7-year period: outcomes show few complications and good efficacy. Obes Surg. 2015;25:951–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1552-z .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1552-z
pubmed: 25585612
Robert M, Espalieu P, Pelascini E, et al. Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2019;393:1299–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30475-1 .
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30475-1
Mahawar KK. Yet Another mortality with a biliopancreatic limb of > 200 cm with one anastomosis gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2018;28:3634–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3462-y .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3462-y
pubmed: 30105662
Mahawar KK, Parmar C, Carr WRJ, et al. Impact of biliopancreatic limb length on severe protein-calorie malnutrition requiring revisional surgery after one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass. J Minimal Access Surg. 2018;14:37–43. https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_198_16 .
doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_198_16
Poghosyan T, Caille C, Moszkowicz D, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the treatment of severe complications after omega-loop gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2017;13:988–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.12.003 .
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.12.003
Ahuja A, Tantia O, Goyal G, et al. MGB-OAGB: effect of biliopancreatic limb length on nutritional deficiency, weight loss, and comorbidity resolution. Obes Surg. 2018;28:3439–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3405-7 .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3405-7
pubmed: 30032419
Tasdighi E, Barzin M, Mahawar KK, et al. Effect of biliopancreatic limb length on weight loss, postoperative complications, and remission of comorbidities in one anastomosis gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2022;32:892–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05848-2 .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05848-2
pubmed: 35091899
Chevallier J-M, Chakhtoura G, Zinzindohoué F. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass. J Chir (Paris). 2009;146:60–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchir.2009.04.003 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jchir.2009.04.003
Cavin J-B, Voitellier E, Cluzeaud F, et al. Malabsorption and intestinal adaptation after one anastomosis gastric bypass compared with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in rats. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2016;311:G492-500. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00197.2016 .
doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00197.2016
pubmed: 27418681
Jammu GS, Sharma R. A 7-year clinical audit of 1107 cases comparing sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-En-Y gastric bypass, and mini-gastric bypass, to determine an effective and safe bariatric and metabolic procedure. Obes Surg. 2016;26:926–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1869-2 .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1869-2
pubmed: 26337694
Bétry C, Disse E, Chambrier C, et al. Need for intensive nutrition care after bariatric surgery. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2017;41:258–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607116637935 .
doi: 10.1177/0148607116637935
pubmed: 26962058
Bruzzi M, Rau C, Voron T, et al. Single anastomosis or mini-gastric bypass: long-term results and quality of life after a 5-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2015;11:321–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2014.09.004 .
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.09.004
Liagre A, Debs T, Kassir R, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass with a biliopancreatic limb of 150 cm: weight loss, nutritional outcomes, endoscopic results, and quality of life at 8-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2020;30:4206–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04775-y .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04775-y
pubmed: 32562132
Omar I, Sam MA, Pegler ME, et al. Effect of one anastomosis gastric bypass on haematinics, vitamin D and parathyroid hormone levels: a comparison between 150 and 200 cm bilio-pancreatic limbs. Obes Surg. 2021;31:2954–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05281-5 .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05281-5
pubmed: 33594592
Poghosyan T, Alameh A, Bruzzi M, et al. Conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to one anastomosis gastric bypass for weight loss failure. Obes Surg. 2019;29:2436–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03864-x .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03864-x
pubmed: 30945152
Slagter N, de Heide LJM, Jutte EH, et al. Outcomes of the one anastomosis gastric bypass with various biliopancreatic limb lengths: a retrospective single-center cohort study. Obes Surg. 2021;31:4236–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05555-y .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05555-y
pubmed: 34283379
pmcid: 8458216
Abdallah E, Emile SH, Zakaria M, et al. One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) with fixed bypass of the proximal two meters versus tailored bypass of the proximal one-third of small bowel: short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2022;36:328–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08284-y .
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08284-y
pubmed: 33479836
Komaei I, Sarra F, Lazzara C, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass-mini gastric bypass with tailored biliopancreatic limb length formula relative to small bowel length: preliminary results. Obes Surg. 2019;29:3062–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04019-8 .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04019-8
pubmed: 31209832