Food Literacy Evaluation Questionnaire (Chinese version, FLEQ-Ch): a validity and cross-cultural adaptation.
cross-culture
food literacy
reliability
validity
Journal
Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.)
ISSN: 1525-1446
Titre abrégé: Public Health Nurs
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8501498
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2022
11 2022
Historique:
revised:
04
05
2022
received:
21
03
2022
accepted:
16
06
2022
pubmed:
11
7
2022
medline:
15
11
2022
entrez:
10
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To conduct a Food Literacy Evaluation Questionnaire Chinese Version (FLEQ-Ch) through a cross-cultural validation of the original questionnaire. This was an observational, cross-sectional study undertaken in two phases: (1) translation and cross-culture adaptation, and (2) psychometric evaluation. A total of 509 residents in Yangzhou City, China were enrolled in this study. A translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the FLEQ in Chinese was developed. The psychometric characteristics of FLEQ-Ch were analyzed for internal consistency, content validity, construct validity and discriminant validity. The KMO value of the questionnaire was 0.901 and the approximate chi-square value of Bartlett's sphericity test was 8132.538. The ranges of the Cronbach's α coefficient and the test-retest coefficient of the total questionnaire and three dimensions were 0.869-0.955 and 0.941-0.952, respectively. The value of content validity index of the total questionnaire was 0.945. Construct validity: (1) Aggregation coefficient was between 0.828 and 0.955; (2) Discrimination coefficient was between 0.004 and 0.227; (3) Correlation coefficient between each factor was between 0.046 and 0.188; the correlation coefficient between each factor and the total questionnaire ranged from 0.419 to 0.788. Discriminant validity: the standardized factor loadings of all items on the corresponding factors were 0.75-0.96. The results of the model-fit indices showed RMSEA was 0.08 and GFI was 0.91. The FLEQ-Ch can effectively evaluate the food literacy of the general public in terms of foods planning and management, foods selection, and foods-making attitudes. It covers the four areas of food literacy, and shows good practicability and operability.
Types de publication
Observational Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1386-1394Informations de copyright
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Schulze, M. B., Martínez-González, M. A., Fung, T. T., Lichtenstein, A. H., & Forouhi, N. G. (2018). Food based dietary patterns and chronic disease prevention. BMJ, 361, k2396. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2396
Palumbo, R. (2016). The effects of food literacy on sustainability of well-being. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 8, 99-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.013
Vidgen, H. A., & Gallegos, D. (2014). Defining food literacy and its components. Appetite, 76, 50-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.01.010
Nishida, C., Uauy, R., Kumanyika, S., & Shetty, P. (2004). The joint WHO/FAO expert consultation on diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases: Process, product and policy implications. Public Health Nutrition, 7(1a), 245-250. https://doi.org/10.1079/PHN2003592
Krause, C. G., Beer-Borst, S., Sommerhalder, K., Hayoz, S., & Abel, T. (2018). A short food literacy questionnaire (SFLQ) for adults: Findings from a Swiss validation study. Appetite, 120, 275-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.08.039
Poelman, M. P., Dijkstra, S. C., Sponselee, H., Kamphuis, C., Battjes-Fries, M. C., Gillebaart, M., & Seidell, J. C. (2018). Towards the measurement of food literacy with respect to healthy eating: The development and validation of the self perceived food literacy scale among an adult sample in the Netherlands. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 15(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-018-0687-z
Palumbo, R., Annarumma, C., Adinolfi, P., Vezzosi, S., Troiano, E., Catinello, G., & Manna, R. (2017). Crafting and applying a tool to assess food literacy: Findings from a pilot study. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 67, 173-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.07.002
Lahne, J., Wolfson, J. A., & Trubek, A. (2017). Development of the Cooking and Food Provisioning Action Scale (CAFPAS): A new measurement tool for individual cooking practice. Food Quality and Preference, 62, 96-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.06.022
Begley, A., Paynter, E., & Dhaliwal, S. S. (2018). Evaluation tool development for food literacy programs. Nutrients, 10(11), 1617.https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10111617
Snook, S. C., & Gorsuch, R. L. (1989). Component analysis versus common factor analysis: A Monte Carlo study. Psychological Bulletin, 106(1), 148-154. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.1.148
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1999). Análisis multivariante (Vol. 491). Madrid: Prentice Hall.
Cuesta-Vargas, A. I., & González-Sánchez, M. (2014). Spanish version of the screening Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire: a cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-014-0157-5
Muniz, J., Elosua, P., & Hambleton, R. K. (2013). International Test Commission Guidelines for test translation and adaptation. Psicothema, 25(2), 151-157. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.24
Daving, Y., Andrén, E., Nordholm, L., & Grimby, G. (2001). Reliability of an interview approach to the Functional Independence Measure. Clinical Rehabilitation, 15(3), 301-310. https://doi.org/10.1191/026921501669986659
Jiang, P., Huang, Q. M., Zhang, Z. J., Zhen, L., & Wang, W. (2017). Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Abbreviated Version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Instrument (EPIC-26). Chinese Journal of Nursing, 52(7), 892-895. https://doi.org/10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2017.07.027
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489-497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
Marinozzi, A., Martinelli, N., Panascì, M., Cancilleri, F., Franceschetti, E., Vincenzi, B., … Denaro, V. (2009). Italian translation of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire, with re-assessment of reliability and validity. Quality of Life Research, 18(7), 923-927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9508-9
Hawley, M. P. (1992). Sources of stress for emergency nurses in four urban Canadian emergency departments. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 18(3), 211-216. PMID: 1602707.
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
Stratford, P. W. (2004). Estimating the standard error of measurement from reliability studies. Physiotherapy Canada, 56(1), 27-30. https://doi.org/10.2310/6640.2004.15377
Guo, L., YU, S., Zhu, Y., Guo, Y., LI, L., Ding, X., … Liu, Y. (2018). Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the student nurse stress index scale (SNSI-CHI). Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science, 937-941. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2018.10.015
Zhu, L., Gao, F., Luo, H., Deng, H., & Wang, Q. (2006). The study of testing the content validity and the internal consistency of general comfort questionnaire. Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing, 22(13), 57-59. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2006.13.034
Auld, G., Baker, S., McGirr, K., Osborn, K. S., & Skaff, P. (2017). Confirming the reliability and validity of others' evaluation tools before adopting for your programs. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 49(5), 441-450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2017.02.006
Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., … de Vet, H. C. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
Luo, W., Sun, J. P., Wu, H. X., & Zhao, X. H. (2019). Psychometric evaluation of the simplified Chinese version of the Care Evaluation Scale Version 2.0 in cancer patients. Journal of Nursing Science, 34(04), 26-30. https://doi.org/10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2019.04.026
Li, Y. Y., Wei, W. H., Hu, Y. L., Yao, Y., Song, X. Q., & Li, Y. (2019). Translation,revision and assessment of reliability and validity of the Quality of Oncology Nursing Care Scale. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 54(09), 1436-1440. CNKI:SUN:ZHHL.0.2019-09-039.
Amouzandeh, C., Fingland, D., & Vidgen, H. A. (2019). A scoping review of the validity, reliability and conceptual alignment of food literacy measures for adults. Nutrients, 11(4), 801. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11040801
Hu, X., Yao, Y. M., Wang, P., & Tu, K. (2017). Effects of different freezing and thawing methods on pork quality. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 38(19), 278-283. https://doi.org/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2017.19.051
Wang, X. (2001). Comparison between the cultural diffences of China and Australia. JIANG HUAI TRIBUNE, (04), 72-76. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-862X.2001.04.014
Cheng, L. L., & Sun, Q. Y. (2017). Development and validation of cancer patient self-management assessment scale. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 52(9), 1082-1087. https://doi.org/10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2017.09.014
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.