Efflux capacity and aldehyde dehydrogenase both contribute to CD8+ T-cell resistance to posttransplant cyclophosphamide.
Journal
Blood advances
ISSN: 2473-9537
Titre abrégé: Blood Adv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101698425
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 09 2022
13 09 2022
Historique:
received:
03
01
2022
accepted:
04
07
2022
pubmed:
13
7
2022
medline:
3
9
2022
entrez:
12
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Mechanisms of T-cell survival after cytotoxic chemotherapy, including posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), are not well understood. Here, we explored the impact of PTCy on human CD8+ T-cell survival and reconstitution, including what cellular pathways drive PTCy resistance. In major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-mismatched mixed lymphocyte culture (MLC), treatment with mafosfamide, an in vitro active cyclophosphamide analog, preserved a relatively normal distribution of naïve and memory CD8+ T cells, whereas the percentages of mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells and phenotypically stem cell memory (Tscm) T-cell subsets were increased. Activated (CD25+) and proliferating CD8+ T cells were derived from both naïve and memory subsets and were reduced but still present after mafosfamide. By contrast, cyclosporine-A (CsA) or rapamycin treatment preferentially maintained nonproliferating CD25- naïve cells. Drug efflux capacity and aldehyde dehydrogenase-1A1 expression were increased in CD8+ T cells in allogeneic reactions in vitro and in patients, were modulated by common γ-chain cytokines and the proliferative state of the cell, and contributed to CD8+ T-cell survival after mafosfamide. The CD8+ T-cell composition early after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in PTCy-treated patients was dominated by CD25+ and phenotypically memory, including Tscm and MAIT, cells, consistent with MLC. Yet, MHC-mismatched murine HCT studies revealed that peripherally expanded, phenotypically memory T cells 1 to 3 months after transplant originated largely from naïve-derived rather than memory-derived T cells surviving PTCy, suggesting that initial resistance and subsequent immune reconstitution are distinct. These studies provide insight into the complex immune mechanisms active in CD8+ T-cell survival, differentiation, and reconstitution after cyclophosphamide, with relevance for post-HCT immune recovery, chemotherapy use in autologous settings, and adoptive cellular therapies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35819449
pii: 485869
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022006961
pmc: PMC9631635
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cyclophosphamide
8N3DW7272P
Aldehyde Dehydrogenase
EC 1.2.1.3
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4994-5008Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P01 CA225618
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL110907
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.
Références
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013 Oct;19(10):1430-8
pubmed: 23819914
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Feb 1;40(4):356-368
pubmed: 34855460
Biochem J. 2001 Aug 1;357(Pt 3):859-65
pubmed: 11463358
Blood. 2015 Apr 30;125(18):2865-74
pubmed: 25736310
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018 Jun;24(6):1108-1110
pubmed: 29653207
Front Immunol. 2022 Feb 15;13:796349
pubmed: 35242129
Curr Pharm Des. 2016;22(5):518-26
pubmed: 26601970
Blood. 2015 Apr 30;125(18):2855-64
pubmed: 25742699
Sci Rep. 2015 Sep 01;5:13558
pubmed: 26324318
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov;6(11):638-47
pubmed: 19786984
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2008 May 15;229(1):20-32
pubmed: 18289623
Front Immunol. 2019 Nov 29;10:2668
pubmed: 31849930
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan;13(1):10-24
pubmed: 26305035
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 Feb;26(2):230-241
pubmed: 31586477
Blood. 2018 Jan 11;131(2):247-262
pubmed: 28986344
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994 May 15;29(2):387-92
pubmed: 7910817
J Exp Med. 2020 May 4;217(5):
pubmed: 32302378
J Clin Invest. 2018 May 1;128(5):1919-1936
pubmed: 29629900
J Neuroimmunol. 2007 Oct;190(1-2):121-6
pubmed: 17854912
Blood. 2022 Apr 11;:
pubmed: 35405017
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015 Feb;50(2):317-9
pubmed: 25419693
Lancet Haematol. 2019 Mar;6(3):e132-e143
pubmed: 30824040
Blood. 2022 Jan 27;139(4):608-623
pubmed: 34657151
Sci Transl Med. 2013 Nov 13;5(211):211ra157
pubmed: 24225944
Am J Transplant. 2009 Nov;9(11):2615-23
pubmed: 19775313
Biochemistry. 1996 Apr 16;35(15):4820-7
pubmed: 8664272
JCI Insight. 2016;1(5):
pubmed: 27213183
Blood. 1995 May 15;85(10):2742-6
pubmed: 7742535
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Oct;22(10):1851-1860
pubmed: 27318038
Immunity. 2009 Nov 20;31(5):834-44
pubmed: 19879163
Leuk Lymphoma. 1995 Dec;20(1-2):77-84
pubmed: 8750626
Blood. 2005 Nov 15;106(10):3584-93
pubmed: 16051742
Eur J Immunol. 2014 Dec;44(12):3614-20
pubmed: 25251877
Blood. 2002 Jul 15;100(2):375-82
pubmed: 12091325
Oncoimmunology. 2015 Mar 20;4(3):e974393
pubmed: 25949893
Drug Metab Rev. 2005;37(4):611-703
pubmed: 16393888
Blood. 2017 Mar 9;129(10):1389-1393
pubmed: 28049637
Biochem Pharmacol. 1998 Jul 1;56(1):31-9
pubmed: 9698086
Blood. 1992 Dec 1;80(11):2735-9
pubmed: 1360267
J Clin Invest. 2019 Mar 26;129(6):2357-2373
pubmed: 30913039
Blood. 2014 Sep 25;124(13):2131-41
pubmed: 25139358
Blood Adv. 2022 Jun 14;6(11):3378-3385
pubmed: 35143644
DNA Repair (Amst). 2007 Aug 1;6(8):1145-54
pubmed: 17485251
Exp Cell Res. 1989 Dec;185(2):496-505
pubmed: 2480910
Cancer Res. 2009 Jul 1;69(13):5450-7
pubmed: 19549914
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 Jan;26(1):94-106
pubmed: 31493539
Cancer Biol Ther. 2013 Apr;14(4):319-26
pubmed: 23358477
Blood. 2011 Jan 27;117(4):1250-9
pubmed: 21084709