Resection type is a predictor of postoperative complications in laparoscopic partial liver resection.
Difficulty score
IWATE criteria
Laparoscopic liver resection
Partial liver resection
Resection type
Tumor depth
Journal
Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2022
12 2022
Historique:
received:
14
09
2021
accepted:
28
05
2022
pubmed:
14
7
2022
medline:
16
11
2022
entrez:
13
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Partial laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is a procedure that can have varying levels of surgical difficulty depending on the tumor status and procedure. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of partial LLR using a new resection classification system. From January 2009 to May 2021, 156 patients underwent LLR; of them, 87 patients who underwent pure partial LLR were included in this study. They were classified according to the IWATE criteria as the low (n = 56) and intermediate (n = 31) difficulty groups and reclassified according to the resection type as the edge (ER, n = 45), bowl-shaped (BSR, n = 27), and dome-shaped resection (DSR, n = 15) groups. The following surgical outcomes were comparatively analyzed among the groups: intraoperative blood loss, the operation time, and complication rates. Preoperative risk factors for intraoperative blood transfusion and complications were evaluated. In the IWATE criteria-based analysis, the intermediate-difficulty group had significantly higher intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.005), operation time (p = 0.005), and Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade-based complication rates (CD grade 2 or higher, p = 0.03) than the low-difficulty group. When analyzing the resection type, the CD grade-based complication rate (p = 0.013) and surgical site infection (SSI, p = 0.005) were significantly higher and the postoperative hospitalization was significantly longer (p = 0.028) in the bowl-shaped resection (BSR) group than in the edge- (ER) and dome-shaped resection (DSR) groups. The tumor size (p = 0.011) and IWATE criteria score (p = 0.006) were independent risk factors for intraoperative blood transfusion in the multivariate analysis. The tumor depth (p = 0.011) and BSR (p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for complications of CD grade 2 or higher in the multivariate analysis. BSR was an independent risk factor for SSI in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.017). Resection type could predict the rate of postoperative complications, while the IWATE criteria could predict the intraoperative surgical difficulty.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Partial laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is a procedure that can have varying levels of surgical difficulty depending on the tumor status and procedure. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of partial LLR using a new resection classification system.
METHODS
From January 2009 to May 2021, 156 patients underwent LLR; of them, 87 patients who underwent pure partial LLR were included in this study. They were classified according to the IWATE criteria as the low (n = 56) and intermediate (n = 31) difficulty groups and reclassified according to the resection type as the edge (ER, n = 45), bowl-shaped (BSR, n = 27), and dome-shaped resection (DSR, n = 15) groups. The following surgical outcomes were comparatively analyzed among the groups: intraoperative blood loss, the operation time, and complication rates. Preoperative risk factors for intraoperative blood transfusion and complications were evaluated.
RESULTS
In the IWATE criteria-based analysis, the intermediate-difficulty group had significantly higher intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.005), operation time (p = 0.005), and Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade-based complication rates (CD grade 2 or higher, p = 0.03) than the low-difficulty group. When analyzing the resection type, the CD grade-based complication rate (p = 0.013) and surgical site infection (SSI, p = 0.005) were significantly higher and the postoperative hospitalization was significantly longer (p = 0.028) in the bowl-shaped resection (BSR) group than in the edge- (ER) and dome-shaped resection (DSR) groups. The tumor size (p = 0.011) and IWATE criteria score (p = 0.006) were independent risk factors for intraoperative blood transfusion in the multivariate analysis. The tumor depth (p = 0.011) and BSR (p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for complications of CD grade 2 or higher in the multivariate analysis. BSR was an independent risk factor for SSI in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.017).
CONCLUSIONS
Resection type could predict the rate of postoperative complications, while the IWATE criteria could predict the intraoperative surgical difficulty.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35831677
doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09372-x
pii: 10.1007/s00464-022-09372-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
9054-9063Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Kawaguchi Y, Hasegawa K, Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS, Strasberg SM, Kokudo N (2016) Survey results on daily practice in open and laparoscopic liver resections from 27 centers participating in the second International Consensus Conference. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 23:283–288
doi: 10.1002/jhbp.340
pubmed: 26946065
Hibi T, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Itano O, Kitagawa Y, Wakabayashi G (2016) Expanding indications and regional diversity in laparoscopic liver resection unveiled by the International Survey on Technical Aspects of Laparoscopic Liver Resection (INSTALL) study. Surg Endosc 30:2975–2983
doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4586-y
pubmed: 26487215
Ban D, Tanabe M, Kumamaru H, Nitta H, Otsuka Y, Miyata H, Kakeji Y, Kitagawa Y, Kaneko H, Wakabayashi G, Yamaue H, Yamamoto M (2020) Safe dissemination of laparoscopic liver resection in 27,146 cases between 2011 and 2017 from the National Clinical Database of Japan. Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003799.Mar20
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003799.Mar20
pubmed: 32941267
Xiang L, Li J, Chen J, Wang X, Guo P, Fan Y, Zheng S (2016) Prospective cohort study of laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 103:1895–1901
doi: 10.1002/bjs.10294
pubmed: 27716899
Machairas N, Kostakis ID, Schizas D, Kykalos S, Nikiteas N, Sotiropoulos GC (2021) Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Updates Surg 73:59–68
doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00930-3
pubmed: 33219937
Hallet J, Beyfuss K, Memeo R, Karanicolas PJ, Marescaux J, Pessaux P (2016) Short and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic compared to open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 5:300–310
doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2016.02.01
pubmed: 27500142
pmcid: 4960414
Elfrink AKE, Haring MPD, de Meijer VE, Ijzermans JNM, Swijnenburg RJ, Braat AE, Erdmann JI, Terkivatan T, Te Riele WW, van den Boezem PB, Coolsen MME, Leclercq WKG, Lips DJ, de Wilde RF, Kok NFM, Grünhagen DJ, Klaase JM, Dutch Hepato Biliary Audit Group (2021) Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic and open resection of benign liver tumours in the Netherlands: a nationwide analysis. HPB (Oxford) 23:1230–1243
doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.12.003
Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, Koffron AJ, Thomas M, Gayet B, Han HS, Wakabayashi G, Belli G, Kaneko H, Ker CG, Scatton O, Laurent A, Abdalla EK, Chaudhury P, Dutson E, Gamblin C, D’Angelica M, Nagorney D, Testa G, Labow D, Manas D, Poon RT, Nelson H, Martin R, Clary B, Pinson WC, Martinie J, Vauthey JN, Goldstein R, Roayaie S, Barlet D, Espat J, Abecassis M, Rees M, Fong Y, McMasters KM, Broelsch C, Busuttil R, Belghiti J, Strasberg S, Chari RS, World Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Surgery (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250:825–830
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b3b2d8
pubmed: 19916210
Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H, Otsuka Y, Nitta H, Abe Y, Hasegawa Y, Katagiri T, Takagi C, Itano O, Kaneko H, Wakabayashi G (2014) A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21:745–753
doi: 10.1002/jhbp.166
pubmed: 25242563
Kawaguchi Y, Fuks D, Kokudo N, Gayet B (2018) Difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: proposal for a new classification. Ann Surg 267:13–17
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002176
pubmed: 28187043
Wakabayashi G (2016) What has changed after the Morioka consensus conference 2014 on laparoscopic liver resection? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 5:281–289
doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2016.03.03
pubmed: 27500140
pmcid: 4960417
Tanaka S, Kubo S, Kanazawa A, Takeda Y, Hirokawa F, Nitta H, Nakajima T, Kaizu T, Kaneko H, Wakabayashi G (2017) Validation of a difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection: a multicenter analysis by the endoscopic liver surgery study group in Japan. J Am Coll Surg 225:249–258
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.03.016
pubmed: 28408311
Ibuki S, Hibi T, Tanabe M, Geller DA, Cherqui D, Wakabayashi G (2020) Short-term outcomes of ‘“difficult”’ laparoscopic liver resection at specialized centers. Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004434
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004434
pubmed: 32889884
Takahara T, Wakabayashi G, Konno H, Gotoh M, Yamaue H, Yanaga K, Fujimoto J, Kaneko H, Unno M, Endo I, Seto Y, Miyata H, Miyazaki M, Yamamoto M (2016) Comparison of laparoscopic major hepatectomy with propensity score matched open cases from the National Clinical Database in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 23:721–734
doi: 10.1002/jhbp.405
pubmed: 27685870
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
pubmed: 15273542
pmcid: 1360123
Russolillo N, Aldrighetti L, Cillo U, Guglielmi A, Ettorre GM, Giuliante F, Mazzaferro V, Dalla Valle R, De Carlis L, Jovine E, Ferrero A, I Go MILS Group (2020) Risk-adjusted benchmarks in laparoscopic liver surgery in a national cohort. Br J Surg 107:845–853
doi: 10.1002/bjs.11404
pubmed: 31925777
He J, Amini N, Spolverato G, Hirose K, Makary M, Wolfgang CL, Weiss MJ, Pawlik TM (2015) National trends with a laparoscopic liver resection: results from a population-based analysis. HPB (Oxford) 17:919–926
doi: 10.1111/hpb.12469
Matsukuma S, Tokumitsu Y, Nakagami Y, Shindo Y, Matsui H, Nakajima M, Iida M, Suzuki N, Takeda S, Nagano H (2021) Laparoscopic resection reduces superficial surgical site infection in liver surgery. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08233-9.Jan4
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08233-9.Jan4
pubmed: 33398563
Nanashima A, Arai J, Oyama S, Ishii M, Abo T, Wada H, Takagi K, Tsuchiya T, Nagayasu T (2014) Associated factors with surgical site infections after hepatectomy: predictions and countermeasures by a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 12:310–314
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.01.018
pubmed: 24509400
Konstantinidis IT, Mastrodomenico P, Sofocleous CT, Brown KT, Getrajdman GI, Gönen M, Allen PJ, Kingham TP, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, Jarnagin WR, D’Angelica MI (2016) Symptomatic perihepatic fluid collections after hepatic resection in the modern era. J Gastrointest Surg 20:748–756
doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-3041-7
pubmed: 26643300
Moreno Elola-Olaso A, Davenport DL, Hundley JC, Daily MF, Gedaly R (2012) Predictors of surgical site infection after liver resection: a multicentre analysis using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. HPB (Oxford) 14:136–141
doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00417.x
Tanaka S, Kawaguchi Y, Kubo S, Kanazawa A, Takeda Y, Hirokawa F, Nitta H, Nakajima T, Kaizu T, Kaibori M, Kojima T, Otsuka Y, Fuks D, Hasegawa K, Kokudo N, Kaneko H, Gayet B, Wakabayashi G (2019) Validation of index-based IWATE criteria as an improved difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. Surgery 165:731–740
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.10.012
pubmed: 30446171
Barron JO, Orabi D, Moro A, Quintini C, Berber E, Aucejo FN, Sasaki K, Kwon CD (2021) Validation of the IWATE criteria as a laparoscopic liver resection difficulty score in a single North American cohort. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08561-4.May24
doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08561-4.May24
pubmed: 34031739
Onda S, Furukawa K, Haruki K, Yasuda J, Shirai Y, Hamura R, Shiozaki H, Gocho T, Shiba H, Ikegami T (2021) Proposal for a revised system for classifying difficulty of laparoscopic partial liver resection. Langenbecks Arch Surg 406:1533–1541
doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02253-2
pubmed: 34165596