Normative measurements of orbital structures by magnetic resonance imaging.
Extraocular muscle
Magnetic resonance imaging
Orbit
Superior ophthalmic vein
Journal
International ophthalmology
ISSN: 1573-2630
Titre abrégé: Int Ophthalmol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7904294
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
21
01
2022
accepted:
13
06
2022
pubmed:
14
7
2022
medline:
2
11
2022
entrez:
13
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We describe and compare the normative values of orbital structures in an Australian cohort on T1-weighted MRI and fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI. Retrospective review of patients who underwent 3T orbital MRI. The maximum extraocular muscle (EOM) and superior ophthalmic vein (SOV) diameters on normal orbits were recorded. The extraocular muscle diameters were summed to produce the sum of all muscles. The normal measurements (mean ± SD) from 141 orbits that had fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced MRI: medial rectus, 4.1 ± 0.5 mm; lateral rectus (LR), 3.9 ± 0.7 mm; superior muscle group (SMG), 4.5 ± 0.7 mm; inferior rectus (IR), 4.6 ± 0.7 mm; and SOV, 1.8 ± 0.7 mm. The normal measurement from 84 orbits that had T1-weighted MRI: MR, 4.1 ± 0.5 mm; LR, 3.4 ± 0.6 mm; SMG, 4.3 ± 0.7 mm; IR, 4.6 ± 0.7 mm; SOV, 2.0 ± 0.7 mm. Eighty-four orbits had both MRI sequences performed. The LR, SMG and the sum of all muscles were significantly larger on fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI sequence than the T1-weighted sequence (P < 0.01), whereas the SOV was significantly larger on the T1-weighted sequence (P < 0.01). These data may aid in diagnosing pathological enlargement of the EOMs and SOV on different scan sequences.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35831774
doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02407-1
pii: 10.1007/s10792-022-02407-1
pmc: PMC9617817
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3869-3875Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
SA J Radiol. 2019 Nov 05;23(1):1772
pubmed: 31754545
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;68(11):2516-2518
pubmed: 33120664
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2000 May-Jun;24(3):493-6
pubmed: 10864092
Radiology. 1991 Apr;179(1):191-8
pubmed: 2006277
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jan/Feb;34(1):68-73
pubmed: 28141624
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr;256(4):839-844
pubmed: 29350266
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Feb;51(2):631-6
pubmed: 19643971
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Apr;170(4):1093-6
pubmed: 9530066