Does an Ileoanal Anastomosis Decrease the Rate of Successful Pregnancy Compared With an Ileorectal Anastomosis? A National Study of 1491 Patients.
Journal
Annals of surgery
ISSN: 1528-1140
Titre abrégé: Ann Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372354
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 May 2023
01 May 2023
Historique:
medline:
29
11
2023
pubmed:
16
7
2022
entrez:
15
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Report the rate of successful pregnancy in a national cohort of women with either an ileal pouch anal (IPAA) or ileorectal (IRA) anastomosis constructed after colectomy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or polyposis. Fertility after IPAA is probably impaired. All available data are corroborated by only small sample size studies. It is not known whether construction of IPAA versus IRA influences the odds of subsequently achieving a successful pregnancy, especially with increased utilization of the laparoscopic approach. All women (age: 12-45 y) undergoing IRA or IPAA in France for polyposis or IBD, between 2010-2020, were included. A control population was defined as women aged from 12 to 45 years undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy during the same period. The odds of successful pregnancy were studied using an adjusted survival analysis. A total of 1491 women (IPAA=872, 58%; IRA=619, 42%) were included. A total of 220 deliveries (15%) occurred during the follow-up period of 71 months (39-100). After adjustment, the odds of successful pregnancy was not significantly associated with type of anastomosis (after IPAA: Hazard Ratio [HR]=0.79, 95% confidence interval=0.56-1.11, P =0.17). The laparoscopic approach increased the odds of achieving successful pregnancy (HR=1.79, 95% confidence interval=1.20-2.63, P =0.004). IRA and IPAA significantly impacted fertility when compared with the control population ( P <0.001). In this large cohort study, total colectomy for polyposis or IBD was associated with reduced fertility compared with the general population. No difference in odds of achieving successful pregnancy was found between IRA and IPAA after adjustment. This analysis suggests laparoscopic surgery may be associated with greater likelihood of pregnancy.
Sections du résumé
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
Report the rate of successful pregnancy in a national cohort of women with either an ileal pouch anal (IPAA) or ileorectal (IRA) anastomosis constructed after colectomy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or polyposis.
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Fertility after IPAA is probably impaired. All available data are corroborated by only small sample size studies. It is not known whether construction of IPAA versus IRA influences the odds of subsequently achieving a successful pregnancy, especially with increased utilization of the laparoscopic approach.
METHODS
METHODS
All women (age: 12-45 y) undergoing IRA or IPAA in France for polyposis or IBD, between 2010-2020, were included. A control population was defined as women aged from 12 to 45 years undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy during the same period. The odds of successful pregnancy were studied using an adjusted survival analysis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 1491 women (IPAA=872, 58%; IRA=619, 42%) were included. A total of 220 deliveries (15%) occurred during the follow-up period of 71 months (39-100). After adjustment, the odds of successful pregnancy was not significantly associated with type of anastomosis (after IPAA: Hazard Ratio [HR]=0.79, 95% confidence interval=0.56-1.11, P =0.17). The laparoscopic approach increased the odds of achieving successful pregnancy (HR=1.79, 95% confidence interval=1.20-2.63, P =0.004). IRA and IPAA significantly impacted fertility when compared with the control population ( P <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In this large cohort study, total colectomy for polyposis or IBD was associated with reduced fertility compared with the general population. No difference in odds of achieving successful pregnancy was found between IRA and IPAA after adjustment. This analysis suggests laparoscopic surgery may be associated with greater likelihood of pregnancy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35837902
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005569
pii: 00000658-990000000-00113
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
806-812Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Références
Olsen KØ, Joelsson M, Laurberg S, et al. Fertility after ileal pouch–anal anastomosis in women with ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg. 1999;86:493–495.
Olsen KØ, Juul S, Berndtsson I, et al. Ulcerative colitis: female fecundity before diagnosis, during disease, and after surgery compared with a population sample. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:15–19.
Olsen KØ, Juul S, Bülow S, et al. Female fecundity before and after operation for familial adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg. 2003;90:227–231.
Nieuwenhuis MH, Douma KF, Bleiker EM, et al. Female fertility after colorectal surgery for familial adenomatous polyposis. Ann Surg. 2010;252:341–344.
Gorgun E, Cengiz TB, Aytac E, et al. Does laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis reduce infertility compared with open approach? Surgery. 2019;166:670–677.
Beyer-Berjot L, Maggiori L, Birnbaum D, et al. A total laparoscopic approach reduces the infertility rate after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg. 2013;258:275–282.
Hor T, Lefevre JH, Shields C, et al. Female sexual function and fertility after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016;31:593–601.
Oresland T, Bemelman WA, Sampietro GM, et al. European evidence based consensus on surgery for ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis. 2015;9:4–25.
Domin J-P. The Scheme of Medical-based Information Systems: From indicators of hospital accounting to a hospital pricing system. Histoire, médecine et santé. 2013;4:69–87.
Quantin C, Cottenet J, Vuagnat A, et al. Quality of perinatal statistics from hospital discharge data: Comparison with civil registration and the 2010 National Perinatal Survey. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2014;43:680–690.
Quantin C, Benzenine E, Hägi M, et al. Estimation of National Colorectal-Cancer Incidence Using Claims Databases. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2012;2012:1–7.
Pierron A, Revert M, Goueslard K, et al. Evaluation of the metrological quality of the medico-administrative data for perinatal indicators: a pilot study in 3 university hospitals. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2015;63:237–246.
Elraiyah T, Hashim Y, Elamin M, et al. The effect of appendectomy in future tubal infertility and ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Res. 2014;192:368–374 e1.
Rasmussen T, Fonnes S, Rosenberg J. Long-term complications of appendectomy: a systematic review. Scand J Surg. 2018;107:189–196.
Wei L, MacDonald T, Shimi S. Association between appendicectomy in females and subsequent pregnancy rate: a cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:401–405.
Charlson M, Wells MT, Ullman R, et al. The Charlson Comorbidity Index can be used prospectively to identify patients who will incur high future costs. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e112479.
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–383.
Rey G, Jougla E, Fouillet A, et al. Ecological association between a deprivation index and mortality in France over the period 1997-2001: variations with spatial scale, degree of urbanicity, age, gender and cause of death. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:33.
Windenberger F, Rican S, Jougla E, et al. Spatiotemporal association between deprivation and mortality: trends in France during the nineties. Eur J Public Health. 2012;22:347–353.
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Computer Program] . Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2005.
Yamaguchi T, Yamamoto S, Fujita S, et al. Long-term outcome of metachronous rectal cancer following ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:500–505.
Anele CC, Xiang J, Martin I, et al. Regular endoscopic surveillance and polypectomy is effective in managing rectal adenoma progression following colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Colorectal Dis. 2022;24:277–283.
Uzzan M, Kirchgesner J, Oubaya N, et al. Risk of rectal neoplasia after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis. 2017;11:930–935.
Faye AS, Oh A, Kumble LD, et al. Fertility impact of initial operation type for female ulcerative colitis patients. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2020;26:1368–1376.
Pachler FR, Brandsborg SB, Laurberg S. Paradoxical impact of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis on male and female fertility in patients with ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60:603–607.
Johnson P, Richard C, Ravid A, et al. Female infertility after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:1119–1126.
Bartels SAL, D’Hoore A, Cuesta MA, et al. Significantly increased pregnancy rates after laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy. Ann Surg. 2012;256:1045–1048.
Pachler FR, Bisgaard T, Mark-Christensen A, et al. Impact on fertility after failure of restorative proctocolectomy in men and women with ulcerative colitis: a 17-year cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020;63:816–822.
Hahnloser D, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG, et al. Pregnancy and delivery before and after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for inflammatory bowel disease: immediate and long-term consequences and outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:1127–1135.
Pachler FR, Toft G, Bisgaard T, et al. Use and success of in vitro fertilisation following restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. A Nationwide 17-year Cohort Study. J Crohns Colitis. 2019;13:1283–1286.
Blondel B, Lelong N, Kermarrec M, et al. Trends in perinatal health in France from 1995 to 2010. Results from the French National Perinatal Surveys. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012;41:e1–e15.