Neonatal admission rate after vaginal breech delivery.
breech presentation
delivery mode
neonatal short-term outcome
vaginal delivery
Journal
Journal of perinatal medicine
ISSN: 1619-3997
Titre abrégé: J Perinat Med
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0361031
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Nov 2022
25 Nov 2022
Historique:
received:
28
01
2022
accepted:
10
06
2022
pubmed:
19
7
2022
medline:
11
11
2022
entrez:
18
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The safest mode of delivery for fetuses in breech presentations is still an ongoing debate. The aim of this study was to analyze neonatal admission rates after vaginal breech delivery and compare it to other modes of delivery in order to counsel pregnant women with breech presentation adequately. We performed a retrospective monocentric analysis of all deliveries with singleton pregnancies in breech presentation > 36.0 weeks of gestation between 01/2018-12/2019. Short-term neonatal morbidity data was collected for vaginal delivery and primary as well as secondary cesarean sections from breech presentations. A total of n=41/482 (8.5%) neonates had to be admitted to NICU: vaginal breech delivery n=18/153 (11.8%), primary cesarean section n=9/101 (8.9%, OR 0.73; CI 0.32-1.70; p=0.47), secondary cesarean section n=10/76 (13.2%, OR 1.14; CI 0.50-2.60, p=0.76) and vaginal vertex delivery n=4/152 (2.6%, OR 0.20; CI 0.06-0.51; p=0.005). There was no significant difference in transfer to NICU between all breech position delivery modes. Despite significantly lower pH and 5' APGAR values after vaginal delivery, neonates delivered by primary cesarean section and NICU admission had to be treated there significantly longer (mean 80.9 vs. 174.0 h). No significant difference in terms of ventilation parameters and infections were found between the vaginal delivery, primary and secondary cesarean section from breech presentation. Vaginal breech delivery does not result in a higher neonatal admission rate in comparison to primary and secondary section. In contrast, there is a shorter NICU duration in case of neonatal admission after vaginal delivery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35844089
pii: jpm-2022-0202
doi: 10.1515/jpm-2022-0202
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1248-1255Informations de copyright
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.
Références
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe e.V. Sectio caesarea: S3-Leitlinie. AWMF-registernummer 015–084; 2020. Available from: https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/015-084l_S3_Sectio-caesarea_2020-06_1_02.pdf.
Hannah, ME, Hannah, WJ, Hewson, SA, Hodnett, ED, Saigal, S, Willan, AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2000;356:1375–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02840-3.
Hogle, KL, Kilburn, L, Hewson, S, Gafni, A, Wall, R, Hannah, ME. Impact of the international term breech trial on clinical practice and concerns: a survey of centre collaborators. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2003;25:14–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1701-2163(16)31077-5.
Hofmeyr, GJ, Hannah, M, Lawrie, TA. Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;2015:CD000166.
Goffinet, F, Carayol, M, Foidart, JM, Alexander, S, Uzan, S, Subtil, D, et al.. Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:1002–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.817.
Sentilhes, L, Schmitz, T, Azria, E, Gallot, D, Ducarme, G, Korb, D, et al.. Breech presentation: clinical practice guidelines from the French college of gynaecologists and obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020;252:599–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.03.033.
Whyte, H, Hannah, ME, Saigal, S, Hannah, WJ, Hewson, S, Amankwah, K, et al.. Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international randomized term breech trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:864–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.056.
Hannah, ME, Whyte, H, Hannah, WJ, Hewson, S, Amankwah, K, Cheng, M, et al.. Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international randomized term breech trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:917–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.08.004.
Kielland-Kaisen, U, Paul, B, Jennewein, L, Klemt, A, Möllmann, CJ, Bock, N, et al.. Maternal and neonatal outcome after vaginal breech delivery of nulliparous versus multiparous women of singletons at term-A prospective evaluation of the frankfurt breech at term cohort (FRABAT). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020;252:583–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.04.029.
Carbillon, L, Benbara, A, Tigaizin, A, Murtada, R, Fermaut, M, Belmaghni, F, et al.. Revisiting the management of term breech presentation: a proposal for overcoming some of the controversies. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020;20:263. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2831-4.
Tunde-Byass, MO, Hannah, ME. Breech vaginal delivery at or near term. Semin Perinatol 2003;27:34–45. https://doi.org/10.1053/sper.2003.50003.
Ghesquière, L, Demetz, J, Dufour, P, Depret, S, Garabedian, C, Subtil, D. Type of breech presentation and prognosis for delivery. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2020;49:101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101832.
Louwen, F, Daviss, BA, Johnson, KC, Reitter, A. Does breech delivery in an upright position instead of on the back improve outcomes and avoid cesareans? Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017;136:151–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12033.
Ekéus, C, Norman, M, Åberg, K, Winberg, S, Stolt, K, Aronsson, A. Vaginal breech delivery at term and neonatal morbidity and mortality – a population-based cohort study in Sweden. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019;32:265–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1378328.
Martel-Santiago, CR, Arencibia-Díaz, RD, Romero-Requejo, A, Valle-Morales, L, Figueras-Falcón, T, García-Hernández, JÁ, et al.. Delivery in breech presentation: perinatal outcome and neurodevelopmental evaluation at 18 months of life. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020;255:147–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.10.020.
Morrison, JJ, Rennie, JM, Milton, PJ. Neonatal respiratory morbidity and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102:101–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb09060.x.
Keag, OE, Norman, JE, Stock, SJ. Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2018;15:e1002494. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002494.
Li, HT, Zhou, YB, Liu, JM. The impact of cesarean section on offspring overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes 2013;37:893–9.
Li, Y, Tian, Y, Zhu, W, Gong, J, Gu, L, Zhang, W, et al.. Cesarean delivery and risk of inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2014;49:834–44. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365521.2014.910834.
Black, M, Bhattacharya, S, Philip, S, Norman, JE, McLernon, DJ. Planned cesarean delivery at term and adverse outcomes in childhood health. JAMA 2015;314:2271–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.16176.
Korb, D, Schmitz, T, Alexander, S, Subtil, D, Verspyck, E, Deneux-Tharaux, C, et al.. Association between planned mode of delivery and severe maternal morbidity in women with breech presentations: a secondary analysis of the PREMODA prospective general population study. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2020;49:101662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.101662.
Vlemmix, F, Bergenhenegouwen, L, Schaaf, JM, Ensing, S, Rosman, AN, Ravelli, ACJ, et al.. Term breech deliveries in the netherlands: did the increased cesarean rate affect neonatal outcome? A population-based cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014;93:888–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12449.
Kotaska, A, Menticoglou, S. No. 384-Management of breech presentation at term. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2019;41:1193–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2018.12.018.
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe e.V. Geburt bei Beckenendlage (S1-Leitlinie, AWMF 015/051) 2013.