Automated image quality assessment of mammography phantoms: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND

Computerized image analysis is a viable technique for evaluating image quality as a complement to human observers.

PURPOSE

To systematically review the image analysis software used in the assessment of 2D image quality using mammography phantoms.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic search of multiple databases was performed from inception to July 2020 for articles that incorporated computerized analysis of 2D images of physical mammography phantoms to determine image quality.

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies were included, 12 were carried out using direct digital imaging and 14 using screen film mammography. The ACR phantom (model-156) was the most frequently evaluated phantom, possibly due to the lack of accepted standard software. In comparison to the inter-observer variations, the computerized image analysis was more consistent in scoring test objects. The template matching method was found to be one of the most reliable algorithms, especially for high-contrast test objects, while several algorithms found low-contrast test objects to be harder to distinguish due to the smaller contrast variations between test objects and their backgrounds. This was particularly true for small object sizes.

CONCLUSION

Image analysis software was in agreement with human observers but demonstrated higher consistency and reproducibility of quality evaluation. Additionally, using computerized analysis, several quantitative metrics such as contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) could be used to complement the conventional scoring method. Implementing a computerized approach for monitoring image quality over time would be crucial to detect any deteriorating mammography system before clinical images are impacted.