A scoping review of COVID-19 online mis/disinformation in Black communities.
Journal
Journal of global health
ISSN: 2047-2986
Titre abrégé: J Glob Health
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 101578780
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Jul 2022
23 Jul 2022
Historique:
entrez:
22
7
2022
pubmed:
23
7
2022
medline:
26
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Mis/disinformation has reached an epidemic level with the COVID-19 virus and can be largely attributed to the growing digitalization of information and its rapid transmission via social media. Approximately 96% of Canadians and 80% of Americans report encountering COVID-19 dis/misinformation on at least one social media site/app. COVID-19 dis/misinformation promotes scepticism and a lack of confidence in COVID-19 interventions. Black people have been disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of negative impacts on their livelihoods and are also more likely to be hesitant to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Dis/misinformation contributes to high rates of COVID-19 infection and low uptake of COVID-19 vaccination. Hence, the purpose of this scoping review was to map out the nature and extent of current research on COVID-19 disinformation among Blacks in Africa and the African diaspora. We searched and reviewed articles from major databases such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL. Our search strategy involved the following concepts: 1) COVID-19, including variants; 2) misinformation, conspiracy theories, and fake news, and modes of misinformation transmission such as social media; and 3) Blacks or people of African descent, or the African diaspora. We retrieved 600 articles that were independently screened by two researchers. We included studies focusing on 1) Black people living inside or outside Africa; and 2) COVID-19 online dis/misinformation among this population. A total of 19 studies fit our inclusion criteria. We used a thematic analysis to analyse qualitative data. Our findings indicate Black people are accessing and often sharing online disinformation and misinformation primarily through social media platforms such as WhatsApp, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram. Dis/misinformation concerns the origin of COVID-19, transmission, prevention, and treatment of COVID-19, assertions of race immunity to the virus, distrust in government and health organizations, and intervention research and programming. There is a global paucity of literature addressing COVID-19 online dis/misinformation among Black people. Dis/misinformation can fuel vaccine hesitancy and threaten the goal of herd immunity. Knowledge of the impact and implications of COVID-19 online dis/misinformation is necessary to inform public health interventions in Black communities.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Mis/disinformation has reached an epidemic level with the COVID-19 virus and can be largely attributed to the growing digitalization of information and its rapid transmission via social media. Approximately 96% of Canadians and 80% of Americans report encountering COVID-19 dis/misinformation on at least one social media site/app. COVID-19 dis/misinformation promotes scepticism and a lack of confidence in COVID-19 interventions. Black people have been disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of negative impacts on their livelihoods and are also more likely to be hesitant to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Dis/misinformation contributes to high rates of COVID-19 infection and low uptake of COVID-19 vaccination. Hence, the purpose of this scoping review was to map out the nature and extent of current research on COVID-19 disinformation among Blacks in Africa and the African diaspora.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
We searched and reviewed articles from major databases such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL. Our search strategy involved the following concepts: 1) COVID-19, including variants; 2) misinformation, conspiracy theories, and fake news, and modes of misinformation transmission such as social media; and 3) Blacks or people of African descent, or the African diaspora. We retrieved 600 articles that were independently screened by two researchers. We included studies focusing on 1) Black people living inside or outside Africa; and 2) COVID-19 online dis/misinformation among this population. A total of 19 studies fit our inclusion criteria. We used a thematic analysis to analyse qualitative data.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Our findings indicate Black people are accessing and often sharing online disinformation and misinformation primarily through social media platforms such as WhatsApp, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram. Dis/misinformation concerns the origin of COVID-19, transmission, prevention, and treatment of COVID-19, assertions of race immunity to the virus, distrust in government and health organizations, and intervention research and programming.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
There is a global paucity of literature addressing COVID-19 online dis/misinformation among Black people. Dis/misinformation can fuel vaccine hesitancy and threaten the goal of herd immunity. Knowledge of the impact and implications of COVID-19 online dis/misinformation is necessary to inform public health interventions in Black communities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35866205
doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.05026
pmc: PMC9304926
doi:
Substances chimiques
COVID-19 Vaccines
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
05026Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: The authors have completed the ICMJE Competing Interest Form (available upon request from the corresponding author) and declare no conflicts of interest.
Références
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Feb;270:113684
pubmed: 33485008
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Apr 09;38:344
pubmed: 34367423
Cien Saude Colet. 2020 Oct;25(suppl 2):4201-4210
pubmed: 33027357
BMJ. 2020 Apr 14;369:m1483
pubmed: 32291262
Afr J Reprod Health. 2020 Jun;24(s1):87-97
pubmed: 34077058
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):e12
pubmed: 33471971
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021 Jul 1;9(2):355-364
pubmed: 34038385
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 07;12:683684
pubmed: 34305736
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 May 27;281:764-768
pubmed: 34042681
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Jun;175:110704
pubmed: 33531727
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 22;15(12):e0244420
pubmed: 33351852
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Nov 29;9(12):
pubmed: 34960152
J Relig Health. 2020 Oct;59(5):2263-2268
pubmed: 32488828
Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Nov;14(6):2200-2207
pubmed: 34213073
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Mar;296:114744
pubmed: 35124544
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 14;15(10):e0240005
pubmed: 33052967
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Oct;263:113356
pubmed: 32967786
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Oct;46(10):1386-400
pubmed: 19328488
Psychol Med. 2022 Mar;52(4):791-793
pubmed: 32684197
Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69
pubmed: 20854677
BMJ. 2021 Jan 14;372:m4921
pubmed: 33446485
CMAJ. 2021 Aug 9;193(31):E1220-E1221
pubmed: 34373272
Health Promot Int. 2022 Apr 29;37(2):
pubmed: 34510187