Phase II Study of Enzalutamide for Patients With Androgen Receptor-Positive Salivary Gland Cancers (Alliance A091404).
Journal
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
ISSN: 1527-7755
Titre abrégé: J Clin Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309333
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 12 2022
20 12 2022
Historique:
pmc-release:
20
12
2023
pubmed:
23
7
2022
medline:
20
12
2022
entrez:
22
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The androgen receptor (AR) is expressed (+) in a subset of salivary gland cancers (SGCs). This phase II trial evaluated the efficacy of the antiandrogen enzalutamide in AR+ SGC. Patients with locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic AR+ SGCs were enrolled. Enzalutamide (160 mg) was given orally once daily. The primary end point was the best overall response rate per RECIST v1.1 within eight cycles. Confirmed responses in ≥ 5 of 41 patients would be considered promising. Secondary end points were progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Forty-six patients were enrolled; 30 (65.2%) received prior systemic therapy, including 13 (28.3%) with AR-targeted drugs. Of seven (15.2%) partial responses (PRs), only two (4.3%) were confirmed per protocol and counted toward the primary end point. Twenty-four patients (52.2%) had stable disease; 15 (32.6%) had progression of disease as best response. Twenty-six patients (56.5%) experienced tumor regression in target lesions; 18 (39.1%) had partial response/stable disease ≥ 6 months. Tumor regressions were observed in female patients (5 of 6 [83.3%]) and those who received prior AR- (6 of 13 [46.2%]) or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-targeted therapies (5 of 8 [62.5%]). Three patients remained on treatment at data cutoff (duration, 32.2-49.8 months). The median progression-free survival was 5.6 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 7.5); the median overall survival was 17.0 months (95% CI, 11.8 to 30.0). The most common adverse events were fatigue, hypertension, hot flashes, and weight loss. Total and free testosterone levels increased by a mean of 61.2% and 48.8%, respectively, after enzalutamide. Enzalutamide demonstrated limited activity in AR+ SGC, failing to meet protocol-defined success in part because of a lack of response durability. Strategies to enhance the efficacy of antiandrogen therapy are needed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35867947
doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00229
pmc: PMC9916043
doi:
Substances chimiques
Androgen Antagonists
0
enzalutamide
93T0T9GKNU
Nitriles
0
Phenylthiohydantoin
2010-15-3
Receptors, Androgen
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02749903']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4240-4249Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180868
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA233290
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001863
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCR NIH HHS
ID : R01 DE027738
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180821
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA233324
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA233160
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180882
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U24 CA196171
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180888
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA233339
Pays : United States
Références
Int J Cancer. 2020 Jun 1;146(11):3196-3206
pubmed: 31745978
Cell Signal. 2015 Nov;27(11):2261-71
pubmed: 26257301
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 1;29(16):e473-6
pubmed: 21422415
Ann Oncol. 2020 Mar;31(3):412-421
pubmed: 32067683
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Dec 15;20(24):6570-81
pubmed: 25316813
Ann Oncol. 2018 Apr 1;29(4):979-984
pubmed: 29211833
Asian J Androl. 2020 Sep-Oct;22(5):441-446
pubmed: 31997782
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Sep 15;22(18):4623-33
pubmed: 27103403
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 11;371(11):1028-38
pubmed: 25184630
Oncotarget. 2017 May 25;8(44):75893-75903
pubmed: 29100278
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec 20;39(36):4061-4068
pubmed: 34597119
Hum Pathol. 2019 Nov;93:37-47
pubmed: 31437521
Eur Urol. 2015 Nov;68(5):787-94
pubmed: 25687533
Head Neck. 2016 Apr;38 Suppl 1:E1838-47
pubmed: 26699379
Lancet Oncol. 2014 May;15(6):592-600
pubmed: 24739897
Oral Oncol. 2009 Nov;45(11):986-90
pubmed: 19574086
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Jan 15;19(2):480-90
pubmed: 23186780
Cancer Cell. 2019 Mar 18;35(3):401-413.e6
pubmed: 30773341
Int J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb;20(1):35-44
pubmed: 24553861
BJU Int. 2001 Jan;87(1):47-56
pubmed: 11121992
Int J Cancer. 2018 Aug 15;143(4):758-766
pubmed: 29492965
Head Neck. 2018 Mar;40(3):605-613
pubmed: 29272069
Cancer Cell. 2004 Nov;6(5):517-27
pubmed: 15542435
Am J Surg Pathol. 2015 May;39(5):705-13
pubmed: 25871467
Nat Rev Cancer. 2015 Dec;15(12):701-11
pubmed: 26563462
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 31;371(5):424-33
pubmed: 24881730
BJU Int. 2006 Sep;98(3):563-72
pubmed: 16771791
Am J Clin Pathol. 2003 Jun;119(6):801-6
pubmed: 12817426
Hum Pathol. 2019 Feb;84:173-182
pubmed: 30267779
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan 10;37(2):125-134
pubmed: 30452336
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Dec 15;22(24):6061-6068
pubmed: 27334835
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 20;36(24):2532-2537
pubmed: 29989854
Cancer Res. 2005 Apr 15;65(8):3404-9
pubmed: 15833875
Am J Surg Pathol. 2015 Jun;39(6):744-52
pubmed: 25723113
N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 27;367(13):1187-97
pubmed: 22894553
Oncotarget. 2015 Apr 20;6(11):9086-98
pubmed: 25871401
Oncotarget. 2017 Aug 2;8(35):59023-59035
pubmed: 28938615
Am J Surg Pathol. 2007 Nov;31(11):1645-52
pubmed: 18059220
Science. 2009 May 8;324(5928):787-90
pubmed: 19359544
Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Mar 1;11(5):1704-12
pubmed: 15755991