Combining symbolic regression with the Cox proportional hazards model improves prediction of heart failure deaths.
Cardiovascular heart diseases
Heart failure
Machine learning
Proportional hazards model
Qlattice
Symbolic regression
Journal
BMC medical informatics and decision making
ISSN: 1472-6947
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088682
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 07 2022
25 07 2022
Historique:
received:
18
01
2021
accepted:
20
07
2022
entrez:
25
7
2022
pubmed:
26
7
2022
medline:
28
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Heart failure is a clinical syndrome characterised by a reduced ability of the heart to pump blood. Patients with heart failure have a high mortality rate, and physicians need reliable prognostic predictions to make informed decisions about the appropriate application of devices, transplantation, medications, and palliative care. In this study, we demonstrate that combining symbolic regression with the Cox proportional hazards model improves the ability to predict death due to heart failure compared to using the Cox proportional hazards model alone. We used a newly invented symbolic regression method called the QLattice to analyse a data set of medical records for 299 Pakistani patients diagnosed with heart failure. The QLattice identified non-linear mathematical transformations of the available covariates, which we then used in a Cox model to predict survival. An exponential function of age, the inverse of ejection fraction, and the inverse of serum creatinine were identified as the best risk factors for predicting heart failure deaths. A Cox model fitted on these transformed covariates had improved predictive performance compared with a Cox model on the same covariates without mathematical transformations. Symbolic regression is a way to find transformations of covariates from patients' medical records which can improve the performance of survival regression models. At the same time, these simple functions are intuitive and easy to apply in clinical settings. The direct interpretability of the simple forms may help researchers gain new insights into the actual causal pathways leading to deaths.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Heart failure is a clinical syndrome characterised by a reduced ability of the heart to pump blood. Patients with heart failure have a high mortality rate, and physicians need reliable prognostic predictions to make informed decisions about the appropriate application of devices, transplantation, medications, and palliative care. In this study, we demonstrate that combining symbolic regression with the Cox proportional hazards model improves the ability to predict death due to heart failure compared to using the Cox proportional hazards model alone.
METHODS
We used a newly invented symbolic regression method called the QLattice to analyse a data set of medical records for 299 Pakistani patients diagnosed with heart failure. The QLattice identified non-linear mathematical transformations of the available covariates, which we then used in a Cox model to predict survival.
RESULTS
An exponential function of age, the inverse of ejection fraction, and the inverse of serum creatinine were identified as the best risk factors for predicting heart failure deaths. A Cox model fitted on these transformed covariates had improved predictive performance compared with a Cox model on the same covariates without mathematical transformations.
CONCLUSION
Symbolic regression is a way to find transformations of covariates from patients' medical records which can improve the performance of survival regression models. At the same time, these simple functions are intuitive and easy to apply in clinical settings. The direct interpretability of the simple forms may help researchers gain new insights into the actual causal pathways leading to deaths.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35879758
doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01943-1
pii: 10.1186/s12911-022-01943-1
pmc: PMC9316394
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
196Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Card Fail Rev. 2017 Apr;3(1):7-11
pubmed: 28785469
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Feb 3;20(1):16
pubmed: 32013925
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 19;14(2):e0210602
pubmed: 30779736
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2010 Feb;8(2):217-28
pubmed: 20136608
JAMA. 2005 Feb 2;293(5):572-80
pubmed: 15687312
Circulation. 2020 Mar 3;141(9):e139-e596
pubmed: 31992061
Science. 2009 Apr 3;324(5923):81-5
pubmed: 19342586
Circulation. 2006 Mar 21;113(11):1424-33
pubmed: 16534009
Sci Adv. 2020 Apr 15;6(16):eaay2631
pubmed: 32426452
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 20;12(7):e0181001
pubmed: 28727739
Eur Heart J. 2013 May;34(19):1404-13
pubmed: 23095984