Contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy: technical feasibility and first outcomes.


Journal

European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2023
Historique:
received: 02 03 2022
accepted: 30 06 2022
revised: 23 05 2022
pubmed: 28 7 2022
medline: 20 12 2022
entrez: 27 7 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To evaluate the feasibility of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM)-guided biopsy at Hospital del Mar, a Spanish university hospital. We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive women with a suspicious enhancing finding eligible for CEM-guided biopsy, who were prospectively enrolled in a pre-marketing clinical validation and feasibility study (October 2019 to September 2021). CEM-guided biopsy is a stereotactic-based procedure that, by using intravenous iodinated contrast media administration and dual-energy acquisition, provides localisation of enhancing lesions. All the biopsies were performed using a vacuum-assisted device. We collected procedural characteristics (patient position and type of approach), and histopathological results. Feasibility endpoints included success (visualisation of the enhancing lesion, post-procedural biopsy changes and clip placement), procedural time, number of scout acquisitions and complications. A total of 66 suspicious enhancing lesions (18.0% foci, 44.0% mass, 38.0% non-mass enhancement; median size 8.5 mm) in 64 patients (median age 59 years, mostly minimal [48.4%] or mild [32.8%] background parenchymal enhancement) were referred for CEM-guided biopsy in the study period. The success rate was 63/66 (95.4%). Amongst successful procedures, patients were most frequently seated (52/63, 82.5%) and the preferred approach was horizontal (48/63, 76.2%). Median total time per procedure was 15 min. Median number of acquisitions needed before targeting was 2 (range 1-4). Complications consisted of hematoma (17/63, 27%) and vasovagal reaction (2/63, 3.2%). At histology, the malignancy rate was 25/63 (39.7%). In this first patient series, CEM-guided breast biopsy was feasible, with success and complication rates similar to those previously reported for magnetic resonance guidance. • CEM may be used to guide biopsy of enhancing lesions through a stereotactic-based procedure combined with intravenous iodinated contrast media administration and dual-energy acquisition. • In this first patient series (n = 64), the success rate of CEM-guided biopsy was above 95%, the only complications were hematoma (22.2%) and vasovagal reaction (3.2%), and median total time per procedure was 15 min. • CEM-guided biopsy is feasible and could potentially be a widely available biopsy technique for enhancing-only lesions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35895121
doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09021-w
pii: 10.1007/s00330-022-09021-w
pmc: PMC9755098
doi:

Substances chimiques

Contrast Media 0
Iodine Compounds 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

417-428

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Nov;211(5):W267-W274
pubmed: 30240292
Eur Radiol. 2018 May;28(5):1909-1918
pubmed: 29168005
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2018 May;26(2):235-246
pubmed: 29622128
Ann Oncol. 2008 Apr;19(4):614-22
pubmed: 18024988
Eur Radiol. 1999;9(8):1656-65
pubmed: 10525886
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Apr;178(4):1017-24
pubmed: 11906893
Eur Radiol. 2003 Feb;13(2):344-6
pubmed: 12599000
Cancer. 2006 Mar 1;106(5):982-90
pubmed: 16456807
Radiology. 2014 Nov;273(2):401-9
pubmed: 25119022
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Oct;193(4):1025-9
pubmed: 19770325
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Dec;191(6):1798-804
pubmed: 19020252
Radiology. 2011 Oct;261(1):92-9
pubmed: 21852565
J Clin Pathol. 2004 Sep;57(9):897-902
pubmed: 15333647
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Feb;194(2):W150-7
pubmed: 20093566
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Sep;94:31-37
pubmed: 28941757
Breast Cancer. 2009;16(2):121-5
pubmed: 18807122
J Breast Cancer. 2018 Dec;21(4):453-462
pubmed: 30607168
Insights Imaging. 2019 Aug 2;10(1):76
pubmed: 31376021
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 May;178(5):1221-5
pubmed: 11959735
Breast Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 11;19(1):106
pubmed: 28893303
Eur Radiol. 2014 Jan;24(1):256-64
pubmed: 24048724
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2015 Jun;59(3):300-5
pubmed: 25900704
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Aug;181(2):527-31
pubmed: 12876040
Breast Care (Basel). 2017 Sep;12(4):212-216
pubmed: 29070983
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Apr;212(4):925-932
pubmed: 30741561
Radiology. 2021 Apr;299(1):36-48
pubmed: 33650905
Radiology. 2019 Oct;293(1):81-88
pubmed: 31453765
BJR Open. 2021 Nov 24;3(1):20210034
pubmed: 34877457
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Sep;46(3):631-645
pubmed: 28470744
Eur Radiol. 2010 Jul;20(7):1554-62
pubmed: 20119729
Clin Imaging. 2017 Mar - Apr;42:193-197
pubmed: 28107737
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jun;208(6):W231-W237
pubmed: 28379734
Rofo. 2014 Jan;186(1):30-6
pubmed: 23897532
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Jan;134:109407
pubmed: 33248401
Eur Radiol. 2014 Jan;24(1):128-35
pubmed: 23979106
Eur Radiol. 2016 Dec;26(12):4371-4379
pubmed: 27097789
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Feb;198(2):292-9
pubmed: 22268171
Breast Care (Basel). 2017 Sep;12(4):208-210
pubmed: 29070982
Insights Imaging. 2020 Feb 5;11(1):12
pubmed: 32025985
Br J Radiol. 2020 Jun;93(1110):20200117
pubmed: 32207989
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Dec;97:37-43
pubmed: 29153365
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Jan;202(1):223-8
pubmed: 24370148

Auteurs

R Alcantara (R)

Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain. ralcantara@psmar.cat.

M Posso (M)

Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.

M Pitarch (M)

Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.

N Arenas (N)

Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.

B Ejarque (B)

Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.

V Iotti (V)

Radiology Unit, Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Laboratory Medicine, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Viale Risorgimento 80, 42123, Reggio Emilia, Italy. valentina.iotti@ausl.re.it.

G Besutti (G)

Radiology Unit, Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Laboratory Medicine, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Viale Risorgimento 80, 42123, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH