mHealth-community health worker telemedicine intervention for surgical site infection diagnosis: a prospective study among women delivering via caesarean section in rural Rwanda.
Health systems
Maternal health
Obstetrics
Other infection, disease, disorder, or injury
Surgery
Journal
BMJ global health
ISSN: 2059-7908
Titre abrégé: BMJ Glob Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101685275
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2022
07 2022
Historique:
received:
14
04
2022
accepted:
12
07
2022
entrez:
28
7
2022
pubmed:
29
7
2022
medline:
2
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Surgical site infections (SSIs) cause a significant global public health burden in low and middle-income countries. Most SSIs develop after patient discharge and may go undetected. We assessed the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of an mHealth-community health worker (CHW) home-based telemedicine intervention to diagnose SSIs in women who delivered via caesarean section in rural Rwanda. This prospective cohort study included women who underwent a caesarean section at Kirehe District Hospital between September 2019 and March 2020. At postoperative day 10 (±3 days), a trained CHW visited the woman at home, provided wound care and transmitted a photo of the wound to a remote general practitioner (GP) via WhatsApp. The GP reviewed the photo and made an SSI diagnosis. The next day, the woman returned to the hospital for physical examination by an independent GP, whose SSI diagnosis was considered the gold standard for our analysis. We describe the intervention process indicators and report the sensitivity and specificity of the telemedicine-based diagnosis. Of 787 women included in the study, 91.4% (n=719) were located at their home by the CHW and all of them (n=719, 100%) accepted the intervention. The full intervention was completed, including receipt of GP telemedicine diagnosis within 1 hour, for 79.0% (n=623). The GPs diagnosed 30 SSIs (4.2%) through telemedicine and 38 SSIs (5.4%) through physical examination. The telemedicine sensitivity was 36.8% and specificity was 97.6%. The negative predictive value was 96.4%. Implementation of an mHealth-CHW home-based intervention in rural Rwanda and similar settings is feasible. Patients' acceptance of the intervention was key to its success. The telemedicine-based SSI diagnosis had a high negative predictive value but a low sensitivity. Further studies must explore strategies to improve accuracy, such as accompanying wound images with clinical data or developing algorithms using machine learning.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Surgical site infections (SSIs) cause a significant global public health burden in low and middle-income countries. Most SSIs develop after patient discharge and may go undetected. We assessed the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of an mHealth-community health worker (CHW) home-based telemedicine intervention to diagnose SSIs in women who delivered via caesarean section in rural Rwanda.
METHODS
This prospective cohort study included women who underwent a caesarean section at Kirehe District Hospital between September 2019 and March 2020. At postoperative day 10 (±3 days), a trained CHW visited the woman at home, provided wound care and transmitted a photo of the wound to a remote general practitioner (GP) via WhatsApp. The GP reviewed the photo and made an SSI diagnosis. The next day, the woman returned to the hospital for physical examination by an independent GP, whose SSI diagnosis was considered the gold standard for our analysis. We describe the intervention process indicators and report the sensitivity and specificity of the telemedicine-based diagnosis.
RESULTS
Of 787 women included in the study, 91.4% (n=719) were located at their home by the CHW and all of them (n=719, 100%) accepted the intervention. The full intervention was completed, including receipt of GP telemedicine diagnosis within 1 hour, for 79.0% (n=623). The GPs diagnosed 30 SSIs (4.2%) through telemedicine and 38 SSIs (5.4%) through physical examination. The telemedicine sensitivity was 36.8% and specificity was 97.6%. The negative predictive value was 96.4%.
CONCLUSIONS
Implementation of an mHealth-CHW home-based intervention in rural Rwanda and similar settings is feasible. Patients' acceptance of the intervention was key to its success. The telemedicine-based SSI diagnosis had a high negative predictive value but a low sensitivity. Further studies must explore strategies to improve accuracy, such as accompanying wound images with clinical data or developing algorithms using machine learning.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35902205
pii: bmjgh-2022-009365
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009365
pmc: PMC9341172
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : FIC NIH HHS
ID : R21 TW011229
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jul 25;17(1):242
pubmed: 28743257
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Feb 12;3(1):e18
pubmed: 25679749
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014 Aug 05;2(3):328-41
pubmed: 25276592
Int J Womens Health. 2019 May 09;11:309-318
pubmed: 31191039
J Hosp Infect. 2017 May;96(1):1-15
pubmed: 28410761
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Sep 28;4(3):e113
pubmed: 27683059
Acta Inform Med. 2018 Oct;26(3):201-206
pubmed: 30515013
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2018 May;47(3):371-384
pubmed: 29524378
Health Policy Plan. 2012 May;27(3):234-44
pubmed: 21441566
Ann Glob Health. 2021 Aug 06;87(1):78
pubmed: 34430228
JAMA Surg. 2017 Jun 1;152(6):595-596
pubmed: 28423162
Am J Surg. 2017 Oct;214(4):616-622
pubmed: 28666581
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Nov 26;18(1):181
pubmed: 31771605
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 05;11(2):e0148343
pubmed: 26849801
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2007 Sep-Oct;15(5):992-7
pubmed: 18157453
Am J Infect Control. 2013 Jun;41(6):549-53
pubmed: 23219668
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016 Oct;17(5):510-9
pubmed: 27463235
J Environ Public Health. 2018 Dec 18;2018:2624591
pubmed: 30662470
Br J Surg. 2012 Mar;99(3):436-43
pubmed: 22237597
Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2017 Jun 13;3:11
pubmed: 28630744
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Jul 18;21:58-62
pubmed: 28794868
Hum Resour Health. 2014 Dec 13;12:71
pubmed: 25495237
Br J Surg. 2019 Jan;106(2):e121-e128
pubmed: 30620071
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 May;222(5):915-27
pubmed: 27016900
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2021 Nov;2021:5047-5050
pubmed: 34892341
Lancet. 2020 Apr 11;395(10231):1180-1181
pubmed: 32278374
JAMA Surg. 2019 Feb 1;154(2):117-124
pubmed: 30422236
PLoS Med. 2010 Mar 09;7(3):e1000243
pubmed: 20231871
Surgery. 2016 Aug;160(2):264-71
pubmed: 27059636
Am J Infect Control. 2013 Jul;41(7):591-6
pubmed: 23318091
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 11;7(1):e013037
pubmed: 28077411
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jul 20;16(1):177
pubmed: 27439909
Am J Med. 2012 Sep;125(9):915-21
pubmed: 22938927
Ann Glob Health. 2021 Aug 06;87(1):77
pubmed: 34430227
World J Surg. 2022 Sep;46(9):2094-2101
pubmed: 35665833
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2019 Jul;2019:2234-2237
pubmed: 31946345
World J Surg. 2011 May;35(5):941-50
pubmed: 21360305
J Vasc Surg. 1998 Jun;27(6):1089-99; discussion 1099-100
pubmed: 9652471
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):462-74
pubmed: 26584737
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Jan;224(1):8-15.e1
pubmed: 27746223