Systems analysis of digestate primary processing techniques.

Anaerobic digestion Digestate management Life-cycle assessment Solid–liquid separation Technology assessment

Journal

Waste management (New York, N.Y.)
ISSN: 1879-2456
Titre abrégé: Waste Manag
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9884362

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Aug 2022
Historique:
received: 06 03 2022
revised: 21 06 2022
accepted: 13 07 2022
pubmed: 31 7 2022
medline: 16 8 2022
entrez: 30 7 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In this paper, we performed technology assessment and systems analysis of primary digestate processing techniques to provide a comprehensive analysis of their environmental and cost performance. We compiled more than 100 observations from large-scale biogas plants and considered digestate based on manure, crops and agro-wastes, and food waste under the geographical contexts of Sweden and Belgium. Centrifuge, screw press, and rotary drum were identified as suitable primary processing techniques. We analyzed the climate impact, energy use, and operational cost of digestate management under these scenarios: no processing, partial processing (solid-liquid separation) and full processing (solid-liquid separation followed by ammonia stripping). As expected, the suitable digestate processing varied with the context, transport was often the most critical cost factor, and emissions from storage reduced the climate savings from the use of biofertilizers. However, treating liquid fraction became a main contributor to cost and climate impact under the Belgian conditions. Consequently, the possibility for local application of liquid fraction as biofertilizer could prevent costs and impacts associated with its further treatment. The main novelty of this work is in its integrative and comprehensive approach toward the choices and impacts of primary processing of digestate. We tried to bridge many individual case studies, drew from experiences of biogas plants in different geographical contexts, assessed suitable processing techniques for different digestate types, and analyzed the environmental impacts and cost of digestate management from a life cycle perspective. We believe that such integrated approaches would help decision-making for increased sustainability of the biogas sector.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35907332
pii: S0956-053X(22)00360-9
doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.07.013
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biofuels 0
Manure 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

352-363

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Roozbeh Feiz (R)

Division of Environmental Technology and Management, Department of Management of Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. Electronic address: roozbeh.feiz@liu.se.

Giacomo Carraro (G)

Division of Environmental Change, Department of Thematic Studies, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Claudio Brienza (C)

Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Department of Green Chemistry and Technology, Ghent University, Belgium.

Erik Meers (E)

Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Department of Green Chemistry and Technology, Ghent University, Belgium.

Marieke Verbeke (M)

Flemish Coordination Centre for Manure Processing, Belgium (currently employed at Trevi Environmental Solutions), Belgium.

Karin Tonderski (K)

Division of Environmental Technology and Management, Department of Management of Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Articles similaires

Nigeria Environmental Monitoring Solid Waste Waste Disposal Facilities Refuse Disposal
Soil Charcoal Nutrients Manure Nitrogen
Animals Silage Carica Cattle Digestion
Animals Cattle Bacteria Manure Houseflies

Classifications MeSH