Systems analysis of digestate primary processing techniques.
Anaerobic digestion
Digestate management
Life-cycle assessment
Solid–liquid separation
Technology assessment
Journal
Waste management (New York, N.Y.)
ISSN: 1879-2456
Titre abrégé: Waste Manag
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9884362
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Aug 2022
01 Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
06
03
2022
revised:
21
06
2022
accepted:
13
07
2022
pubmed:
31
7
2022
medline:
16
8
2022
entrez:
30
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In this paper, we performed technology assessment and systems analysis of primary digestate processing techniques to provide a comprehensive analysis of their environmental and cost performance. We compiled more than 100 observations from large-scale biogas plants and considered digestate based on manure, crops and agro-wastes, and food waste under the geographical contexts of Sweden and Belgium. Centrifuge, screw press, and rotary drum were identified as suitable primary processing techniques. We analyzed the climate impact, energy use, and operational cost of digestate management under these scenarios: no processing, partial processing (solid-liquid separation) and full processing (solid-liquid separation followed by ammonia stripping). As expected, the suitable digestate processing varied with the context, transport was often the most critical cost factor, and emissions from storage reduced the climate savings from the use of biofertilizers. However, treating liquid fraction became a main contributor to cost and climate impact under the Belgian conditions. Consequently, the possibility for local application of liquid fraction as biofertilizer could prevent costs and impacts associated with its further treatment. The main novelty of this work is in its integrative and comprehensive approach toward the choices and impacts of primary processing of digestate. We tried to bridge many individual case studies, drew from experiences of biogas plants in different geographical contexts, assessed suitable processing techniques for different digestate types, and analyzed the environmental impacts and cost of digestate management from a life cycle perspective. We believe that such integrated approaches would help decision-making for increased sustainability of the biogas sector.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35907332
pii: S0956-053X(22)00360-9
doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.07.013
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biofuels
0
Manure
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
352-363Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.