Artificial intelligence in nursing and midwifery: A systematic review.
artificial intelligence
deep learning
healthcare
machine learning
midwifery
natural language processing
neural networks
nursing
Journal
Journal of clinical nursing
ISSN: 1365-2702
Titre abrégé: J Clin Nurs
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9207302
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2023
Jul 2023
Historique:
revised:
04
07
2022
received:
28
12
2021
accepted:
18
07
2022
medline:
8
6
2023
pubmed:
1
8
2022
entrez:
31
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques are being applied in nursing and midwifery to improve decision-making, patient care and service delivery. However, an understanding of the real-world applications of AI across all domains of both professions is limited. To synthesise literature on AI in nursing and midwifery. CINAHL, Embase, PubMed and Scopus were searched using relevant terms. Titles, abstracts and full texts were screened against eligibility criteria. Data were extracted, analysed, and findings were presented in a descriptive summary. The PRISMA checklist guided the review conduct and reporting. One hundred and forty articles were included. Nurses' and midwives' involvement in AI varied, with some taking an active role in testing, using or evaluating AI-based technologies; however, many studies did not include either profession. AI was mainly applied in clinical practice to direct patient care (n = 115, 82.14%), with fewer studies focusing on administration and management (n = 21, 15.00%), or education (n = 4, 2.85%). Benefits reported were primarily potential as most studies trained and tested AI algorithms. Only a handful (n = 8, 7.14%) reported actual benefits when AI techniques were applied in real-world settings. Risks and limitations included poor quality datasets that could introduce bias, the need for clinical interpretation of AI-based results, privacy and trust issues, and inadequate AI expertise among the professions. Digital health datasets should be put in place to support the testing, use, and evaluation of AI in nursing and midwifery. Curricula need to be developed to educate the professions about AI, so they can lead and participate in these digital initiatives in healthcare. Adult, paediatric, mental health and learning disability nurses, along with midwives should have a more active role in rigorous, interdisciplinary research evaluating AI-based technologies in professional practice to determine their clinical efficacy as well as their ethical, legal and social implications in healthcare.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques are being applied in nursing and midwifery to improve decision-making, patient care and service delivery. However, an understanding of the real-world applications of AI across all domains of both professions is limited.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
To synthesise literature on AI in nursing and midwifery.
METHODS
METHODS
CINAHL, Embase, PubMed and Scopus were searched using relevant terms. Titles, abstracts and full texts were screened against eligibility criteria. Data were extracted, analysed, and findings were presented in a descriptive summary. The PRISMA checklist guided the review conduct and reporting.
RESULTS
RESULTS
One hundred and forty articles were included. Nurses' and midwives' involvement in AI varied, with some taking an active role in testing, using or evaluating AI-based technologies; however, many studies did not include either profession. AI was mainly applied in clinical practice to direct patient care (n = 115, 82.14%), with fewer studies focusing on administration and management (n = 21, 15.00%), or education (n = 4, 2.85%). Benefits reported were primarily potential as most studies trained and tested AI algorithms. Only a handful (n = 8, 7.14%) reported actual benefits when AI techniques were applied in real-world settings. Risks and limitations included poor quality datasets that could introduce bias, the need for clinical interpretation of AI-based results, privacy and trust issues, and inadequate AI expertise among the professions.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Digital health datasets should be put in place to support the testing, use, and evaluation of AI in nursing and midwifery. Curricula need to be developed to educate the professions about AI, so they can lead and participate in these digital initiatives in healthcare.
RELEVANCE FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE
CONCLUSIONS
Adult, paediatric, mental health and learning disability nurses, along with midwives should have a more active role in rigorous, interdisciplinary research evaluating AI-based technologies in professional practice to determine their clinical efficacy as well as their ethical, legal and social implications in healthcare.
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
2951-2968Informations de copyright
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Akhu-Zaheya, L., Al-Maaitah, R., & Bany Hani, S. (2018). Quality of nursing documentation: Paper-based health records versus electronic-based health records. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(3-4), e578-e589. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14097
An, R., Chang, G.-M., Fan, Y.-Y., Ji, L.-L., Wang, X.-H., & Hong, S. (2021). Machine learning-based patient classification system for adult patients in intensive care units: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Nursing Management, 29, 1752-1762. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13284
Angus, D. C. (2020). Randomized clinical trials of artificial intelligence. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 323(11), 1043-1045. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.1039
Bagnasco, A., Siri, A., Aleo, G., Rocco, G., & Sasso, L. (2015). Applying artificial neural networks to predict communication risks in the emergency department. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(10), 2293-2304. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12691
Bakken, S., Hyun, S., Friedman, C., & Johnson, S. B. (2005). ISO reference terminology models for nursing: Applicability for natural language processing of nursing narratives. International Journal of Medical Informatics (Shannon, Ireland), 74(7), 615-622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.01.002
Barrera, A., Gee, C., Wood, A., Gibson, O., Bayley, D., & Geddes, J. (2020). Introducing artificial intelligence in acute psychiatric inpatient care: Qualitative study of its use to conduct nursing observations. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 23(1), 34-38. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2019-300136
Booth, R. G., Strudwick, G., McBride, S., O'Connor, S., & Solano López, A. L. (2021). How the nursing profession should adapt for a digital future. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 373, n1190. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1190
Brom, H., Carthon, J. M. B., Ikeaba, U., & Chittams, J. (2020). Leveraging electronic health records and machine learning to tailor nursing Care for Patients at high risk for readmissions. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 35(1), 27-33.
Buchanan, C., Howitt, M. L., Wilson, R., Booth, R. G., Risling, T., & Bamford, M. (2020). Predicted influences of artificial intelligence on the domains of nursing: Scoping review. JMIR Nursing, 3(1), e23939.
Burkov, A. (2019). The hundred-Page machine learning book. Andriy Burkov.
Chowdhary, K. R. (2020). Fundamentals of artificial intelligence. Springer India Private Limited.
Çitil, E. T., & Çitil Canbay, F. (2022). Artificial intelligence and the future of midwifery: What do midwives think about artificial intelligence? A qualitative study. Health Care for Women International, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2022.2055760. Online ahead of print.
Collins, G. S., Reitsma, J. B., Altman, D. G., & Moons, K. G. M. (2015). Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement. BMC Medicine, 13(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0241-z
Cruz Rivera, S., Liu, X., Chan, A.-W., Denniston, A. K., & Calvert, M. J. (2020). Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: The SPIRIT-AI extension. Nature Medicine, 26(9), 1351-1363. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-1037-7
dos Santos, B. S., Steiner, M. T. A., Fenerich, A. T., & Lima, R. H. P. (2019). Data mining and machine learning techniques applied to public health problems: A bibliometric analysis from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 138, 106120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106120
Esteva, A., Chou, K., Yeung, S., Naik, N., Madani, A., Mottaghi, A., Liu, Y., Topol, E., Dean, J., & Socher, R. (2021). Deep learning-enabled medical computer vision. NPJ Digital Medicine, 4(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-00376-2
Fry, H. (2019). Hello world: How to be human in the age of the machine. Black Swan.
Garcia, M. (2016). Racist in the machine: The disturbing implications of algorithmic bias. World Policy Journal, 33(4), 111-117. https://doi.org/10.1215/07402775-3813015
Improta, G., Mazzella, V., Vecchione, D., Santini, S., & Triassi, M. (2020). Fuzzy logic-based clinical decision support system for the evaluation of renal function in post-transplant patients. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 26(4), 1224-1234. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13302
Jeon, E., Kim, Y., Park, H., Park, R. W., Shin, H., & Park, H.-A. (2020). Analysis of adverse drug reactions identified in nursing notes using reinforcement learning. Healthcare Informatics Research, 26(2), 104-111. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2020.26.2.104
Johnstone, M. J. (2007). Journal impact factors: Implications for the nursing profession. International Nursing Review, 54(1), 35-40.
Laurant, M. G. H., Biezen, M. v. d., Wijers, N., Watananirun, K., Kontopantelis, E., & Vught, A. J. A. H. v. (2018). Nurses as substitutes for doctors in primary care. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 7(2), CD001271. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001271.pub3
Loh, E. (2018). Medicine and the rise of the robots: A qualitative review of recent advances of artificial intelligence in health. BMJ Leader, 2(2), 59-63. https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2018-000071
Luo, W., Phung, D., Tran, T., Gupta, S., Rana, S., Karmakar, C., Shilton, A., Yearwood, J., Dimitrova, N., Ho, T. B., Venkatesh, S., & Berk, M. (2016). Guidelines for developing and reporting machine learning predictive models in biomedical research: A multidisciplinary view. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(12), e323. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5870
Mandal, I. (2017). Machine learning algorithms for the creation of clinical healthcare enterprise systems. Enterprise Information Systems, 11(9), 1374-1400. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2016.1251617
Manheim, K., & Kaplan, L. (2019). Artificial intelligence: Risks to privacy and democracy. Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 21(106), 106-188.
Mantas, J., Ammenwerth, E., Demiris, G., Hasman, A., Haux, R., Hersh, W., Hovenga, E., Lun, K. C., Marin, H., Martin-Sanchez, F., Wright, G., & IMIA Recommendations on Education Task Force. (2010). Recommendations of the international medical informatics association (IMIA) on education in biomedical and health informatics. First revision. Methods of Information in Medicine, 49(2), 105-120. https://doi.org/10.3414/ME5119
Nagendran, M., Chen, Y., Lovejoy, C. A., Gordon, A. C., Komorowski, M., Harvey, H., Topol, E. J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Collins, G. S., & Maruthappu, M. (2020). Artificial intelligence versus clinicians: Systematic review of design, reporting standards, and claims of deep learning studies. BMJ (Online), 368, m689. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m689
Ng, Z. Q. P., Ling, L. Y. J., Chew, H. S. J., & Lau, Y. (2021). The role of artificial intelligence in enhancing clinical nursing care: A scoping review. Journal of Nursing Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13425. Online ahead of print.
O'Connor, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and predictive analytics in nursing education. Nurse Education in Practice, 56, 103224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103224
O'Connor, S., & LaRue, E. (2021). Integrating informatics into undergraduate nursing education: A case study using a spiral learning approach. Nurse Education in Practice, 50, 102934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102934
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Parker, J. M., & Hill, M. N. (2017). A review of advanced practice nursing in the United States, Canada, Australia and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR), China. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 4(2), 196-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2017.01.002
Peckol, J. K. (2021). Introduction to fuzzy logic. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.
Reddy, S., Rogers, W., Makinen, V. P., Coiera, E., Brown, P., Wenzel, M., Weicken, E., Ansari, S., Mathur, P., Casey, A., & Kelly, B. (2021). Evaluation framework to guide implementation of AI systems into healthcare settings. BMJ Health & Care Informatics, 28(1), e100444. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100444
Redman, R. W., Pressler, S. J., Furspan, P., & Potempa, K. (2015). Nurses in the United States with a practice doctorate: Implications for leading in the current context of health care. Nursing Outlook, 63(2), 124-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2014.08.003
Ronquillo, C. E., Peltonen, L.-M., Pruinelli, L., Chu, C. H., Bakken, S., Beduschi, A., Cato, K., Hardiker, N., Junger, A., Michalowski, M., Nyrup, R., Rahimi, S., Reed, D. N., Salakoski, T., Salanterä, S., Walton, N., Weber, P., Wiegand, T., & Topaz, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence in nursing: Priorities and opportunities from an international invitational think-tank of the nursing and artificial intelligence leadership collaborative. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 77, 3707-3717. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14855
Salvage, J., & White, J. (2019). Nursing leadership and health policy: Everybody's business. International Nursing Review, 66(2), 147-150. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12523
Samoili, S., López Cobo, M., Gómez, E., De Prato, G., Martínez-Plumed, F., & Delipetrev, B. (2020). AI watch: Defining artificial intelligence. Towards an operational definition and taxonomy of artificial intelligence. Retrieved from Luxembourg https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC118163/jrc118163_ai_watch._defining_artificial_intelligence_1.pdf
Seibert, K., Domhoff, D., Bruch, D., Schulte-Althoff, M., Fürstenau, D., Biessmann, F., & Wolf-Ostermann, K. (2021). Application scenarios for artificial intelligence in nursing care: Rapid review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(11), e26522.
Shorey, S., Ang, E., Yap, J., Ng, E. D., Lau, S. T., & Chui, C. K. (2019). A virtual counseling application using artificial intelligence for communication skills training in nursing education: Development study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(10), e14658. https://doi.org/10.2196/14658
Sidey-Gibbons, J., & Sidey-Gibbons, C. (2019). Machine learning in medicine: A practical introduction. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19, 64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0681-4
Theobald, O. (2017). Machine learning for absolute beginners: A plain English introduction. Scatterplot Press.
United Nations Population Fund. (2021). The State of the World's Midwifery 2021. Retrieved from New York: https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/21-038-UNFPA-SoWMy2021-Report-ENv4302.pdf
Vayena, E., Blasimme, A., & Cohen, I. G. (2018). Machine learning in medicine: Addressing ethical challenges. PLoS Medicine, 15(11), e1002689. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002689
von Gerich, H., Moen, H., Block, L. J., Chu, C. H., DeForest, H., Hobensack, M., Michalowski, M., Mitchell, J., Nibber, R., Olalia, M. A., Pruinelli, L., Ronquillo, C. E., Topaz, M., & Peltonen, L. M. (2022). Artificial intelligence-based technologies in nursing: A scoping literature review of the evidence. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 127, 104153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104153
World Health Organization. (2020). State of the World's Nursing 2020: Investing in 21 education, jobs and leadership. Retrieved from Geneva: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240003279