Acute kidney injury as the most important predictor of poor prognosis after interventional treatment for aortic stenosis.
acute kidney injury
major adverse cardiovascular events
severe aortic stenosis
surgical aortic valve replacement
transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Journal
Kardiologia polska
ISSN: 1897-4279
Titre abrégé: Kardiol Pol
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 0376352
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
03
08
2022
accepted:
03
08
2022
pubmed:
5
8
2022
medline:
16
11
2022
entrez:
4
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common acquired valvular disease. There are two methods of interventional treatment: surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The choice between SAVR and TAVI depends on the assessment of individual perioperative risk and long-term treatment outcomes. It is essential to identify factors that may influence the outcomes of the treatment to minimize their negative effects. The study aimed to identify the most important risk factor which affects treatment outcomes in patients with AS undergoing SAVR/TAVI. This study reviewed retrospectively patients with AS who underwent SAVR or TAVI. The primary outcomes included incidences of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as cardiovascular death, stroke, and hospitalization for cardiovascular issues assessed over a one-year follow-up period. An occurrence of postprocedural AKI (acute kidney injury) was identified as an independent predictor of MACE. The study included 78 patients, with the same number of subjects in each group (SAVR/TAVI [n = 39]). Twenty-nine patients developed AKI. It was similar in both groups (SAVR [n = 15]; TAVR [n = 14]). In the SAVR group, 13 (33%) patients developed at least one MACE compared to 5 (13%) patients in the TAVI group. AKI and the type of procedure (SAVR) were shown to be significantly and independently associated with the development of MACE (P = 0.01 and P = 0.03, respectively) as shown in the Cox multivariable regression model. Our study demonstrated that AKI is the strongest predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events after using both methods of aortic valve replacement (SAVR/TAVI).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common acquired valvular disease. There are two methods of interventional treatment: surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The choice between SAVR and TAVI depends on the assessment of individual perioperative risk and long-term treatment outcomes. It is essential to identify factors that may influence the outcomes of the treatment to minimize their negative effects.
AIMS
The study aimed to identify the most important risk factor which affects treatment outcomes in patients with AS undergoing SAVR/TAVI.
METHODS
This study reviewed retrospectively patients with AS who underwent SAVR or TAVI. The primary outcomes included incidences of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as cardiovascular death, stroke, and hospitalization for cardiovascular issues assessed over a one-year follow-up period. An occurrence of postprocedural AKI (acute kidney injury) was identified as an independent predictor of MACE.
RESULTS
The study included 78 patients, with the same number of subjects in each group (SAVR/TAVI [n = 39]). Twenty-nine patients developed AKI. It was similar in both groups (SAVR [n = 15]; TAVR [n = 14]). In the SAVR group, 13 (33%) patients developed at least one MACE compared to 5 (13%) patients in the TAVI group. AKI and the type of procedure (SAVR) were shown to be significantly and independently associated with the development of MACE (P = 0.01 and P = 0.03, respectively) as shown in the Cox multivariable regression model.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study demonstrated that AKI is the strongest predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events after using both methods of aortic valve replacement (SAVR/TAVI).
Identifiants
pubmed: 35924995
pii: VM/OJS/J/91252
doi: 10.33963/KP.a2022.0182
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM