Evaluation of dosimetric effects of metallic artifact reduction and tissue assignment on Monte Carlo dose calculations for


Journal

Medical physics
ISSN: 2473-4209
Titre abrégé: Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0425746

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Historique:
revised: 24 05 2022
received: 16 12 2021
accepted: 25 06 2022
pubmed: 5 8 2022
medline: 15 9 2022
entrez: 4 8 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Monte Carlo (MC) simulation studies, aimed at evaluating the magnitude of tissue heterogeneity in The geometry of the IsoSeed I25.S17plus source is validated by comparing the MC calculated results of the TG-43 parameters for the line source approximation with the TG-43U1S2 consensus data. Four MC absorbed dose calculations are performed in two virtual patient models using the egs_brachy MC code: (1) TG-43-based D The very good agreement of TG-43 parameters of this study and the published consensus data within 3% validates the geometry of the IsoSeed I25.S17plus source. For the clinical studies, the TG-43-based calculations show a D The implementation of MAR and TAS on post-implant CT images have no dosimetric effect on the

Identifiants

pubmed: 35925023
doi: 10.1002/mp.15865
doi:

Substances chimiques

Water 059QF0KO0R

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

6195-6208

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Références

Rivard MJ, Coursey BM, DeWerd LA, et al. Update of AAPM Task Group No. 43 Report: a revised AAPM protocol for brachytherapy dose calculations. Med Phys. 2004;31(3):633-674.
Chibani O, Williamson JF, Todor D. Dosimetric effects of seed anisotropy and interseed attenuation for 103Pd and 125I prostate implants. Med Phys. 2005;32(8):2557-2566.
Beaulieu L, Tedgren AC, Carrier JF, et al. Report of the Task Group 186 on model-based dose calculation methods in brachytherapy beyond the TG-43 formalism: current status and recommendations for clinical implementation. Med Phys. 2012;39(10):6208-6236.
DeMarco JJ, Smathers JB, Burnison CM, Ncube QK, Solberg TD. CT-based dosimetry calculations for 125I prostate implants. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;45(5):1347-1353.
Landry G, Reniers B, Murrer L, et al. Sensitivity of low energy brachytherapy Monte Carlo dose calculations to uncertainties in human tissue composition. Med Phys. 2010;37(10):5188-5198.
Carrier JF, D'Amours M, Verhaegen F, et al. Postimplant dosimetry using a Monte Carlo dose calculation engine: a new clinical standard. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68(4):1190-1198.
Miksys N, Xu C, Beaulieu L, Thomson RM. Development of virtual patient models for permanent implant brachytherapy Monte Carlo dose calculations: interdependence of CT image artifact mitigation and tissue assignment. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60(15):6039-6062.
Miksys N, Vigneault E, Martin AG, Beaulieu L, Thomson RM. Large-scale retrospective Monte Carlo dosimetric study for permanent implant prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;97(3):606-615.
Kawrakow I, Mainegra-Hing E, Rogers DWO, Tessier F, Walters BRB. The EGSnrc Code System: Monte Carlo simulation of electron and photon transport. Technical Report PIRS-701. National Research Council Canada; 2017.
Chamberland MJP, Taylor REP, Rogers DWO, Thomson RM. egs_brachy: a versatile and fast Monte Carlo code for brachytherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2016;61(23):8214-8231.
Low DA, Dempsey JF. Evaluation of the gamma dose distribution comparison method. Med Phys. 2003;30(9):2455-2464.
Pantelis E, Papagiannis P, Anagnostopoulos G, Baltas D. New 125 I brachytherapy source IsoSeed I25.S17plus: Monte Carlo dosimetry simulation and comparison to sources of similar design. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2013;5(4):240-249.
Moutsatsos A, Pantelis E, Papagiannis P, Baltas D. Experimental determination of the Task Group-43 dosimetric parameters of the new I25.S17plus 125I brachytherapy source. Brachytherapy. 2014;13(6):618-628.
Carleton laboratory for radiotherapy physics TG-43 parameter database V2. Nov 2021. https://physics.carleton.ca/clrp/egs_brachy/seed_database/I125/BEBIG_I125.S17_plus
Thomson RM, Taylor REP, Chamberland MJP, Rogers DWO. User Manual for egs_brachy. Report CLRP-17-02. Carleton University Canada; 2017.
Taylor REP, Yegin G, Rogers DWO. Benchmarking BrachyDose: voxel-based EGSnrc Monte Carlo calculations of TG-43 dosimetry parameters. Med Phys. 2007;34(2):445-457.
Safigholi H, Chamberland MJP, Taylor REP, et al. Update of the CLRP TG-43 parameter database for LDR low-energy brachytherapy sources. Med phys. 2020;47(9):4656-4669.
Valdes-Cortez C, Mansour I, Rivard MJ, et al. A study of Type B uncertainties associated with photoelectric effect in low-energy Monte Carlo simulations. Phys Med Biol. 2021;66(10):105014.
Kawrakow I, Mainegra-Hing E, Tessier F, Townson R, Walters BRB. The EGSnrc C++ Class Library. Technical Report PIRS-898. National Research Council Canada; 2018.
A Handbook of Radioactivity Measurements Procedures. NCRP Publications; 1985. NCRP Report 58
Berger MJ, Hubbell JH. XCOM: Photon Cross Sections on a Personal Computer. NIST; 1987. Report NBSIR87-3597.
Kawrakow I. Electron impact ionization cross sections for EGSnrc. Med Phys. 2002;29:1230. abstract.
Rivard MJ, Ballester F, Butler WM, et al. Supplement 2 for the 2004 update of the AAPM Task Group No. 43 report: joint recommendations by the AAPM and GEC-ESTRO. Med Phys. 2017;44:e297-e338.
Walters B, Kawrakow I, Rogers DWO. DOSXYZnrc User's Manual. NRCC Report PIRS-794revB. National Research Council of Canada; 2018.
International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Photon, Electron, Proton and Neutron Interaction Data for Body Tissues. Report No. 46. ICRU Publications; 1992.
Salembier C, Lavagnini P, Nickers P, et al. Tumour and target volumes in permanent prostate brachytherapy: a supplement to the ESTRO/EAU/EORTC recommendations on prostate brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2007;83(1):3-10.
Deasy JO, Blanco AI, Clark VH. CERR: a computational environment for radiotherapy research. Med Phys. 2003;30(5):979-985.
Ezzell GA, Burmeister JW, Dogan N, et al. IMRT commissioning: multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119. Med Phys. 2009;36(11):5359-5373.
Yang Y, Rivard MJ. Comparison of brachytherapy dose distributions using the gamma-index method. Joint AAPM/COMP meeting. 2011. abstract.
Heilemann G, Poppe B, Laub W. On the sensitivity of common gamma-index evaluation methods to MLC misalignments in Rapidarc quality assurance. Med Phys. 2013;40(3):031702.
Fredh A, Scherman JB, Fog LS, et al. Patient QA systems for rotational radiation therapy: a comparative experimental study with intentional errors. Med Phys. 2013;40(3):031716.
Mason J, Al-Qaisieh B, Bownes P, Henry A, Thwaites D. Monte Carlo investigation of I-125 interseed attenuation for standard and thinner seeds in prostate brachytherapy with phantom validation using a MOSFET. Med Phys. 2013;40(3):031717-031728.
Mason J, Al-Qaisieh B, Bownes P, Henry A, Thwaites D. Investigation of interseed attenuation and tissue composition effects in 125I seed implant prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy. 2014;13(6):603-610.
Chibani O, Williamson JF. MCPI: a sub-minute Monte Carlo dose calculation engine for prostate implants. Med Phys. 2005;32(12):3688-3698.
Carrier JF, Beaulieu L, Therriault-Proulx F, Roy R. Impact of interseed attenuation and tissue composition for permanent prostate implants. Med Phys. 2006;33(3):595-604.
Oliveira SM, Teixeira NJ, Fernandes L, Teles P, Vaz P. Dosimetric effect of tissue heterogeneity for 125I prostate implants. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2014;19(6):392-398.
Landry G, Reniers B, Pignol JP, Beaulieu L, Verhaegen F. The difference of scoring dose to water or tissues in Monte Carlo dose calculations for low energy brachytherapy photon sources. Med Phys. 2011;38(3):1526-1533.
Mann-Krzisnik D, Verhaegen F, Enger SA. The influence of tissue composition uncertainty on dose distributions in brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2018;126(3):394-410.

Auteurs

Isong Assam (I)

UKSH, Campus Kiel, Clinic of Radiotherapy (Radiooncology), Kiel, Germany.

Javier Vijande (J)

Departamento de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear, Universitat de Valencia (UV), Burjassot, Spain.
Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Radiofísica e Instrumentación Nuclear en Medicina (IRIMED), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS-La Fe), Universitat de Valencia (UV), Valencia, Spain.
Instituto de Física Corpuscular, IFIC (UV-CSIC), Burjassot, Spain.

Facundo Ballester (F)

Departamento de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear, Universitat de Valencia (UV), Burjassot, Spain.
Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Radiofísica e Instrumentación Nuclear en Medicina (IRIMED), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS-La Fe), Universitat de Valencia (UV), Valencia, Spain.

José Pérez-Calatayud (J)

Radiotherapy Department, La Fe Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
Radiotherapy Department, Clinica Benidorm, Alicante, Spain.

Björn Poppe (B)

Center for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology - University Center for Medical Radiation Physics, Pius-Hospital, Medical Campus of Carl-von-Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

Frank-André Siebert (FA)

UKSH, Campus Kiel, Clinic of Radiotherapy (Radiooncology), Kiel, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH