A fully ingrowing implant for cranial reconstruction: Results in critical size defects in sheep using 3D-printed titanium scaffold.
3D-printing
Bone ingrowth
Cranial defect
Cranioplasty
Open porous implant
Scaffold
Sheep
Journal
Biomaterials advances
ISSN: 2772-9508
Titre abrégé: Biomater Adv
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9918383886206676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2022
May 2022
Historique:
received:
15
12
2021
revised:
23
02
2022
accepted:
06
03
2022
entrez:
5
8
2022
pubmed:
6
8
2022
medline:
9
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Current alloplastic materials such as PMMA, titanium or PEEK don't show relevant bone ingrowth into the implant when used for cranioplasty, ceramic implants have the drawback being brittle. New materials and implant designs are urgently needed being biocompatible, stable enough for cranioplasty and stimulating bone formation. In an in vivo critical size sheep model circular cranial defects (>2.4 cm) were covered with three different types of a 3D-printed porous titanium scaffolds with multidirectional, stochastically distributed architecture (uncoated scaffold, hydroxyapatite-coated scaffold, uncoated scaffold filled with a calcium phosphate bone cement paste containing β-TCP granules). An empty titanium mesh served as control. Among the different investigated setups the hydroxyapatite-coated scaffolds showed a surprisingly favourable performance. Push-out tests revealed a 2.9 fold higher force needed in the hydroxyapatite-coated scaffolds compared to the mesh group. Mean CT density at five different points inside the scaffold was 2385HU in the hydroxyapatite-coated group compared to 1978HU in the uncoated scaffold at nine months. Average lateral bone ingrowth after four months in the hydroxyapatite-coated scaffold group was up to the implant center, 12.1 mm on average, compared to 2.8 mm in the control group covered with mesh only. These properties make the investigated scaffold with multidirectional, stochastically distributed structure superior to all products currently on the market. The study gives a good idea of what future materials for cranioplasty might look like.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35929289
pii: S2772-9508(22)00031-0
doi: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.212754
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bone Cements
0
Durapatite
91D9GV0Z28
Titanium
D1JT611TNE
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
212754Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.