Impact of moderate or severe left ventricular outflow tract calcification on clinical outcomes of patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with self- and balloon-expandable valves: a post hoc analysis from the SOLVE-TAVI trial.


Journal

EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology
ISSN: 1969-6213
Titre abrégé: EuroIntervention
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101251040

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Oct 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 10 8 2022
medline: 26 10 2022
entrez: 9 8 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) calcification has been associated with worse outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and may influence the selection of prosthetic valve type. We aimed to evaluate the impact of LVOT calcification on outcomes after TAVI with a self-expanding valve (SEV) versus a balloon-expandable valve (BEV). Patients of the SOLVE-TAVI trial, randomised to Edwards SAPIEN 3 or Medtronic Evolut R, were divided according to LVOT calcification into no/mild (≤1 calcium nodule extending <5 mm and covering <10% of the LVOT perimeter) and moderate/severe LVOT calcification groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, stroke, moderate/severe paravalvular regurgitation, permanent pacemaker implantation and annulus rupture at 30 days. Additional endpoints included all-cause and cardiovascular mortality at 1 year. Out of 416 eligible patients, moderate/severe LVOT calcification was present in 143 (34.4%). Moderate/severe LVOT calcification was associated with significantly longer fluoroscopy time and higher rates of pre- and post-dilation. Regardless of the LVOT calcification group, there was no significant difference in the primary endpoint associated with the valve type (no/mild LVOT calcification group: SEV 25.0% vs BEV 27.0%; hazard ratio [HR] 1.10, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.68-1.73; p=0.73 and moderate/severe LVOT calcification group: SEV 25.0% vs BEV 19.4%; HR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.38-1.61; p=0.49), no significant interaction between LVOT calcification and valve type (p Moderate/severe LVOT calcification was associated with longer fluoroscopy time and an increased need for pre- and post-dilation, but not with a higher incidence of early and mid-term adverse clinical outcomes, regardless of valve type. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02737150).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) calcification has been associated with worse outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and may influence the selection of prosthetic valve type.
AIMS OBJECTIVE
We aimed to evaluate the impact of LVOT calcification on outcomes after TAVI with a self-expanding valve (SEV) versus a balloon-expandable valve (BEV).
METHODS METHODS
Patients of the SOLVE-TAVI trial, randomised to Edwards SAPIEN 3 or Medtronic Evolut R, were divided according to LVOT calcification into no/mild (≤1 calcium nodule extending <5 mm and covering <10% of the LVOT perimeter) and moderate/severe LVOT calcification groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, stroke, moderate/severe paravalvular regurgitation, permanent pacemaker implantation and annulus rupture at 30 days. Additional endpoints included all-cause and cardiovascular mortality at 1 year.
RESULTS RESULTS
Out of 416 eligible patients, moderate/severe LVOT calcification was present in 143 (34.4%). Moderate/severe LVOT calcification was associated with significantly longer fluoroscopy time and higher rates of pre- and post-dilation. Regardless of the LVOT calcification group, there was no significant difference in the primary endpoint associated with the valve type (no/mild LVOT calcification group: SEV 25.0% vs BEV 27.0%; hazard ratio [HR] 1.10, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.68-1.73; p=0.73 and moderate/severe LVOT calcification group: SEV 25.0% vs BEV 19.4%; HR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.38-1.61; p=0.49), no significant interaction between LVOT calcification and valve type (p
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Moderate/severe LVOT calcification was associated with longer fluoroscopy time and an increased need for pre- and post-dilation, but not with a higher incidence of early and mid-term adverse clinical outcomes, regardless of valve type. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02737150).

Identifiants

pubmed: 35942626
pii: EIJ-D-22-00156
doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00156
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Calcium SY7Q814VUP

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02737150']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

759-768

Auteurs

Serdar Farhan (S)

The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Georg Stachel (G)

Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.

Steffen Desch (S)

Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.
University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany and University Heart Center Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Thomas Kurz (T)

University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany and University Heart Center Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Hans-Josef Feistritzer (HJ)

Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.

Philipp Hartung (P)

Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.

Ingo Eitel (I)

University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany and University Heart Center Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Holger Nef (H)

Medizinische Klinik I, Abteilung für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg/Gießen, Gießen, Germany.

Oliver Doerr (O)

Medizinische Klinik I, Abteilung für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg/Gießen, Gießen, Germany.

Alexander Lauten (A)

Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Helios Klinikum Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.

Ulf Landmesser (U)

German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Charité, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.

Marcus Sandri (M)

Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.

David Holzhey (D)

Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Michael Borger (M)

Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Hüseyin Ince (H)

Medizinische Klinik I im Zentrum fuer Innere Medizin (ZIM), Universitaetsklinikum Rostock, Rostock, Germany.

Alper Öner (A)

Medizinische Klinik I im Zentrum fuer Innere Medizin (ZIM), Universitaetsklinikum Rostock, Rostock, Germany.

Roza Meyer-Saraei (R)

University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany and University Heart Center Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Harm Wienbergen (H)

Klinikum Links der Weser, Herzzentrum Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

Andreas Fach (A)

Klinikum Links der Weser, Herzzentrum Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

Norbert Frey (N)

German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Suzanne de Waha-Thiele (S)

Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Holger Thiele (H)

Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH