Association of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Ticagrelor With Vein Graft Failure After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Aged
Aspirin
/ adverse effects
Coronary Artery Bypass
/ adverse effects
Female
Graft Occlusion, Vascular
/ etiology
Hemorrhage
/ chemically induced
Humans
Male
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
/ adverse effects
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Saphenous Vein
/ transplantation
Ticagrelor
/ adverse effects
Treatment Outcome
Journal
JAMA
ISSN: 1538-3598
Titre abrégé: JAMA
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7501160
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 08 2022
09 08 2022
Historique:
entrez:
9
8
2022
pubmed:
10
8
2022
medline:
12
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The role of ticagrelor with or without aspirin after coronary artery bypass graft surgery remains unclear. To compare the risks of vein graft failure and bleeding associated with ticagrelor dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) or ticagrelor monotherapy vs aspirin among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to June 1, 2022, without language restriction. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of ticagrelor DAPT or ticagrelor monotherapy vs aspirin on saphenous vein graft failure. Individual patient data provided by each trial were synthesized into a combined data set for independent analysis. Multilevel logistic regression models were used. The primary analysis assessed the incidence of saphenous vein graft failure per graft (primary outcome) in RCTs comparing ticagrelor DAPT with aspirin. Secondary outcomes were saphenous vein graft failure per patient and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding events. A supplementary analysis included RCTs comparing ticagrelor monotherapy with aspirin. A total of 4 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis, involving 1316 patients and 1668 saphenous vein grafts. Of the 871 patients in the primary analysis, 435 received ticagrelor DAPT (median age, 67 years [IQR, 60-72 years]; 65 women [14.9%]; 370 men [85.1%]) and 436 received aspirin (median age, 66 years [IQR, 61-73 years]; 63 women [14.5%]; 373 men [85.5%]). Ticagrelor DAPT was associated with a significantly lower incidence of saphenous vein graft failure (11.2%) per graft than was aspirin (20%; difference, -8.7% [95% CI, -13.5% to -3.9%]; OR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.35 to 0.74]; P < .001) and was associated with a significantly lower incidence of saphenous vein graft failure per patient (13.2% vs 23.0%, difference, -9.7% [95% CI, -14.9% to -4.4%]; OR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.35 to 0.74]; P < .001). Ticagrelor DAPT (22.1%) was associated with a significantly higher incidence of BARC type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding events than was aspirin (8.7%; difference, 13.3% [95% CI, 8.6% to 18.0%]; OR, 2.98 [95% CI, 1.99 to 4.47]; P < .001), but not BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding events (1.8% vs 1.8%, difference, 0% [95% CI, -1.8% to 1.8%]; OR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.37 to 2.69]; P = .99). Compared with aspirin, ticagrelor monotherapy was not significantly associated with saphenous vein graft failure (19.3% vs 21.7%, difference, -2.6% [95% CI, -9.1% to 3.9%]; OR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.58 to 1.27]; P = .44) or BARC type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding events (8.9% vs 7.3%, difference, 1.7% [95% CI, -2.8% to 6.1%]; OR, 1.25 [95% CI, 0.69 to 2.29]; P = .46). Among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery, adding ticagrelor to aspirin was associated with a significantly decreased risk of vein graft failure. However, this was accompanied by a significantly increased risk of clinically important bleeding.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35943473
pii: 2795029
doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.11966
pmc: PMC9364127
doi:
Substances chimiques
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
0
Ticagrelor
GLH0314RVC
Aspirin
R16CO5Y76E
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
554-562Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
EuroIntervention. 2022 Apr 01;17(17):e1371-e1396
pubmed: 35354550
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Jan 1;55(1):4-90
pubmed: 30165632
JAMA. 2018 Apr 24;319(16):1677-1686
pubmed: 29710164
Circulation. 2020 Nov 10;142(19):1799-1807
pubmed: 32862716
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Jun;111(6):1770-1780
pubmed: 33794156
Heart. 2016 May 15;102(10):763-9
pubmed: 26891756
JAMA. 2015 Apr 28;313(16):1657-65
pubmed: 25919529
Circulation. 2011 Jun 14;123(23):2736-47
pubmed: 21670242
Circulation. 2017 Oct 31;136(18):1749-1764
pubmed: 29084780
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Jul;160(1):116-127.e4
pubmed: 31606176
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Apr;105(4):1109-1119
pubmed: 29453002
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 3;381(14):1309-1320
pubmed: 31475798
J Card Surg. 2022 Mar;37(3):563-570
pubmed: 34961950
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898
pubmed: 31462531
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Sep;7(5):577-585
pubmed: 30505741
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jan 18;79(2):e21-e129
pubmed: 34895950
Circulation. 2021 Aug 31;144(9):728-745
pubmed: 34460327
BMJ. 2019 Oct 10;367:l5476
pubmed: 31601578
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Mar 1;57(3):520-528
pubmed: 31566205