Genomic-environmental associations in wild cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.).

abiotic stress cranberry crop wild relatives environmental association local adaptation

Journal

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)
ISSN: 2160-1836
Titre abrégé: G3 (Bethesda)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101566598

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 09 2022
Historique:
received: 14 06 2022
accepted: 01 08 2022
pubmed: 10 8 2022
medline: 5 10 2022
entrez: 9 8 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Understanding the genetic basis of local adaptation in natural plant populations, particularly crop wild relatives, may be highly useful for plant breeding. By characterizing genetic variation for adaptation to potentially stressful environmental conditions, breeders can make targeted use of crop wild relatives to develop cultivars for novel or changing environments. This is especially appealing for improving long-lived woody perennial crops such as the American cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.), the cultivation of which is challenged by biotic and abiotic stresses. In this study, we used environmental association analyses in a collection of 111 wild cranberry accessions to identify potentially adaptive genomic regions for a range of bioclimatic and soil conditions. We detected 126 significant associations between SNP marker loci and environmental variables describing temperature, precipitation, and soil attributes. Many of these markers tagged genes with functional annotations strongly suggesting a role in adaptation to biotic or abiotic conditions. Despite relatively low genetic variation in cranberry, our results suggest that local adaptation to divergent environments is indeed present, and the identification of potentially adaptive genetic variation may enable a selective use of this germplasm for breeding more stress-tolerant cultivars.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35944211
pii: 6659098
doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkac203
pmc: PMC9526045
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Plant Extracts 0
Soil 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Genetics Society of America 2022.

Références

Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 8;7(1):17195
pubmed: 29222468
Genetics. 2014 Apr;196(4):1263-75
pubmed: 24443444
PLoS One. 2013 May 07;8(5):e62577
pubmed: 23667493
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2006 Apr;17(2):155-60
pubmed: 16504497
Plant Biotechnol J. 2016 Apr;14(4):1070-85
pubmed: 26311018
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Aug 27;365(1552):2459-68
pubmed: 20643735
Ecol Evol. 2014 Jun;4(12):2395-409
pubmed: 25360276
Plants (Basel). 2020 Oct 26;9(11):
pubmed: 33114692
Am J Hum Genet. 2001 Jan;68(1):191-197
pubmed: 11083947
Am J Bot. 2014 Oct;101(10):1770-9
pubmed: 25326619
Genetics. 2002 Nov;162(3):1401-13
pubmed: 12454083
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Dec 16;11:607770
pubmed: 33391320
Genetics. 2006 May;173(1):321-30
pubmed: 16322511
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 14;9(4):e94688
pubmed: 24732668
Plant Cell. 2008 Mar;20(3):658-76
pubmed: 18344284
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 8;13(2):e0192540
pubmed: 29420602
Bioinformatics. 2017 Apr 15;33(8):1243-1245
pubmed: 28119308
PLoS One. 2011 May 04;6(5):e19379
pubmed: 21573248
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 03;11(6):e0154787
pubmed: 27258048
Bioinformatics. 2019 Feb 1;35(3):526-528
pubmed: 30016406
J Genet. 2018 Dec;97(5):1339-1351
pubmed: 30555082
Nature. 2004 Jul 22;430(6998):471-6
pubmed: 15269773
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Jul;30(7):1687-99
pubmed: 23543094
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 28;9(2):e90346
pubmed: 24587335
BMC Genomics. 2017 Jan 9;18(1):55
pubmed: 28068923
Am J Hum Genet. 2021 Oct 7;108(10):1880-1890
pubmed: 34478634
Theor Appl Genet. 2015 Sep;128(9):1713-24
pubmed: 26044122
PLoS One. 2014 May 13;9(5):e97047
pubmed: 24823485
Genetics. 2010 Aug;185(4):1411-23
pubmed: 20516501
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Feb 10;12:633310
pubmed: 33643360
Nat Commun. 2016 Feb 04;7:10532
pubmed: 26842267
G3 (Bethesda). 2019 Oct 7;9(10):3423-3438
pubmed: 31439717
BMC Genomics. 2008 Jan 27;9:44
pubmed: 18221561
G3 (Bethesda). 2016 Apr 07;6(4):835-43
pubmed: 26818076
Genetics. 2010 Jul;185(3):969-82
pubmed: 20439779
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 6;14(11):e0224763
pubmed: 31693686
Nat Methods. 2012 Mar 04;9(4):357-9
pubmed: 22388286
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 7;17(3):e0264966
pubmed: 35255111
Plant Genome. 2016 Mar;9(1):
pubmed: 27898759
Nat Genet. 2012 May 20;44(6):725-31
pubmed: 22610118
PLoS Genet. 2011 Jun;7(6):e1002159
pubmed: 21738492
Evolution. 1984 Nov;38(6):1358-1370
pubmed: 28563791
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 1;108(9):3530-5
pubmed: 21245334

Auteurs

Jeffrey L Neyhart (JL)

USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Genetic Improvement for Fruits & Vegetables Laboratory, Chatsworth, NJ 08019, USA.

Michael B Kantar (MB)

Department of Tropical Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA.

Juan Zalapa (J)

USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Vegetable Crops Research Unit, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Department of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

Nicholi Vorsa (N)

Department of Plant Biology, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.

Articles similaires

Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi

Perceptions of the neighbourhood food environment and food insecurity of families with children during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Irene Carolina Sousa Justiniano, Matheus Santos Cordeiro, Hillary Nascimento Coletro et al.
1.00
Humans COVID-19 Food Insecurity Cross-Sectional Studies Female
Coal Metagenome Phylogeny Bacteria Genome, Bacterial
Fragaria Light Plant Leaves Osmosis Stress, Physiological

Classifications MeSH