Upper limb soft robotic wearable devices: a systematic review.
Assistive technology
Exoskeletons
Exosuits
Rehabilitation robotics
Soft robotics
Upper limb
Journal
Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation
ISSN: 1743-0003
Titre abrégé: J Neuroeng Rehabil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101232233
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 08 2022
10 08 2022
Historique:
received:
11
03
2022
accepted:
21
07
2022
entrez:
10
8
2022
pubmed:
11
8
2022
medline:
13
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Soft robotic wearable devices, referred to as exosuits, can be a valid alternative to rigid exoskeletons when it comes to daily upper limb support. Indeed, their inherent flexibility improves comfort, usability, and portability while not constraining the user's natural degrees of freedom. This review is meant to guide the reader in understanding the current approaches across all design and production steps that might be exploited when developing an upper limb robotic exosuit. The literature research regarding such devices was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The investigated features are the intended scenario, type of actuation, supported degrees of freedom, low-level control, high-level control with a focus on intention detection, technology readiness level, and type of experiments conducted to evaluate the device. A total of 105 articles were collected, describing 69 different devices. Devices were grouped according to their actuation type. More than 80% of devices are meant either for rehabilitation, assistance, or both. The most exploited actuation types are pneumatic (52%) and DC motors with cable transmission (29%). Most devices actuate 1 (56%) or 2 (28%) degrees of freedom, and the most targeted joints are the elbow and the shoulder. Intention detection strategies are implemented in 33% of the suits and include the use of switches and buttons, IMUs, stretch and bending sensors, EMG and EEG measurements. Most devices (75%) score a technology readiness level of 4 or 5. Although few devices can be considered ready to reach the market, exosuits show very high potential for the assistance of daily activities. Clinical trials exploiting shared evaluation metrics are needed to assess the effectiveness of upper limb exosuits on target users.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35948915
doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01065-9
pii: 10.1186/s12984-022-01065-9
pmc: PMC9367113
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
87Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007 Nov;54(11):1940-50
pubmed: 18018689
Bioinspir Biomim. 2018 Aug 24;13(6):066001
pubmed: 30088477
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2010 Aug;18(4):339-50
pubmed: 20363684
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2017 Jul;2017:1672-1678
pubmed: 28814060
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:3889-92
pubmed: 26737143
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Jun 5;15(1):46
pubmed: 29866106
J Int Med Res. 2017 Dec;45(6):1831-1847
pubmed: 27677300
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2017 Jul;2017:1633-1638
pubmed: 28814054
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 24;9(1):9157
pubmed: 31235870
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Sep 12;11:137
pubmed: 25217124
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2020 Jul;2020:4926-4929
pubmed: 33019093
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Feb 22;16(1):29
pubmed: 30791919
Soft Robot. 2020 Jun;7(3):370-385
pubmed: 31905105
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Jan 6;18(1):4
pubmed: 33407580
Soft Robot. 2022 Feb;9(1):14-35
pubmed: 33271057
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Dec 01;8:947
pubmed: 25520638
Front Robot AI. 2020 Dec 17;7:595844
pubmed: 33501357
J Neurol. 2014 Jul;261(7):1269-88
pubmed: 24687893
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021 Apr;35(4):334-345
pubmed: 33655789
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Feb 17;15(1):9
pubmed: 29454392
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2017 Jul;2017:56-61
pubmed: 28813793
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2018 Aug;26(8):1604-1617
pubmed: 29994617
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:8130-4
pubmed: 22256229
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2019 Jun;2019:423-428
pubmed: 31374666
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2019 Jun;2019:1197-1202
pubmed: 31374792
Front Neurorobot. 2019 Jun 18;13:39
pubmed: 31275129
J Hand Ther. 2011 Jul-Sep;24(3):257-64; quiz 265
pubmed: 21420279
NeuroRehabilitation. 2018;43(1):99-110
pubmed: 30056437
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2014 Aug;29(7):719-27
pubmed: 25017296
Front Neurosci. 2017 Oct 25;11:597
pubmed: 29118693
J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2017 Jan 01;4:2055668316680315
pubmed: 31186920
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2019 Jun;2019:1209-1214
pubmed: 31374794
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 14;12(3):e0173730
pubmed: 28291825
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2017;2017:1605101
pubmed: 29104424
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2018 Jul 17;2018:1925694
pubmed: 30116293
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Jul 26;14(7):e1006223
pubmed: 30048444
World J Orthop. 2018 Sep 18;9(9):112-119
pubmed: 30254967
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2017 Jul;2017:1679-1685
pubmed: 28814061