Uptake of Voluntary Occupational Health Care-Assessments of German Occupational Health Physicians and Employees.
employees
interviews
multi-perspective study
occupational health care
occupational health physicians
predictors for uptake
survey
uptake of occupational health care
workers’ health surveillance
workplace health management
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 08 2022
04 08 2022
Historique:
received:
14
04
2022
revised:
28
07
2022
accepted:
02
08
2022
entrez:
12
8
2022
pubmed:
13
8
2022
medline:
16
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Workers' health surveillance is considered essential for employees' health and protection against hazardous working conditions. It is one part of occupational health care and thus one of four pillars of holistic workplace health management. In Germany, employers are obliged to provide mandatory and voluntary occupational health care (OHC) to employees, dependent on the defined occupational hazards. However, employees are not obliged to make use of voluntary OHC. No empirical information is available about the uptake of voluntary OHC by employees and the influencing factors in Germany. Thus, we carried out an explorative multi-perspective study with qualitative and quantitative elements to get insights from the view of occupational health physicians (OHPs) and employees. We conducted a survey among OHPs based on prior statements from two focus group discussions. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to detect enablers and barriers regarding employee uptake of the offered voluntary OHC. We used extended qualitative methods among employees instead of an analogous survey. In total, 460 OHPs participated in the survey (response rate 29.1%), and 25 employees took part in interviews. Most of the employees had not heard the term voluntary OHC before, and only a few remembered respective occupational health care after explanatory request. In total, 78% of the OHPs assessed that employees always/mostly take up voluntary OHC. The most important attributed reason for non-uptake was that employees see no need for occupational health care when they feel healthy. The most important enabler for the perceived high uptake of voluntary OHC in the regression analysis was a positive attitude of the OHP toward voluntary OHC. While OHPs perceived that voluntary OHC was accepted by a majority of employees, this was not confirmed by the interviews with selected employees. This could indicate that the OHP respondents overestimated the amount of uptake. Since it became clear that employees are often unfamiliar with the terminology itself, we see a need for more and better information regarding the objectives and content of occupational health care to improve this important pillar of workplace health management.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35954960
pii: ijerph19159602
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159602
pmc: PMC9367937
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021 Aug;94(6):1287-1295
pubmed: 33704584
Occup Environ Med. 2003 Sep;60(9):705-10, 633
pubmed: 12937199
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Feb 06;15(2):
pubmed: 29415515
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 19;18(4):
pubmed: 33669705
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Feb;94(2):149-57
pubmed: 24207115
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258
pubmed: 25791983
Occup Med (Lond). 2017 Oct 01;67(7):574-578
pubmed: 29016828
J Occup Environ Med. 2013 Dec;55(12):1401-8
pubmed: 24270300
Med Glas (Zenica). 2019 Aug 01;16(2):
pubmed: 31187610
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 10;19(1):473
pubmed: 31291962
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2016 Apr;89(3):449-59
pubmed: 26259728
J Occup Environ Med. 2019 Dec;61(12):e497-e502
pubmed: 31626069
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 17;18(4):
pubmed: 33671336
Arch Public Health. 2021 Mar 18;79(1):38
pubmed: 33736689
Iran J Med Sci. 2020 Nov;45(6):405-424
pubmed: 33281258
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 02;17(17):
pubmed: 32887430
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017 Aug;90(6):481-490
pubmed: 28285323
Health Policy. 1997 Nov;42(2):101-15
pubmed: 10175619
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 13;17(20):
pubmed: 33066098
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 22;18(19):
pubmed: 34639262
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 28;16(5):
pubmed: 30823428
Occup Med (Lond). 1998 Jul;48(5):303-7
pubmed: 9876413
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2020 May 19;15:11
pubmed: 32477422
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 31;18(21):
pubmed: 34769990
BMJ Open. 2021 May 5;11(5):e045018
pubmed: 33952550
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 31;1:CD009009
pubmed: 30699470
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 20;17(6):
pubmed: 32244960
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2015;28(4):731-9
pubmed: 26216311
Occup Med (Lond). 2015 Aug;65(6):451-8
pubmed: 26023107
Front Public Health. 2020 May 05;8:145
pubmed: 32432071
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2013 May;86(4):451-62
pubmed: 22562521
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 12;21(1):1847
pubmed: 34641841