Generation of a CRISPR activation mouse that enables modelling of aggressive lymphoma and interrogation of venetoclax resistance.
Journal
Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 08 2022
12 08 2022
Historique:
received:
29
08
2021
accepted:
29
07
2022
entrez:
12
8
2022
pubmed:
13
8
2022
medline:
17
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
CRISPR technologies have advanced cancer modelling in mice, but CRISPR activation (CRISPRa) methods have not been exploited in this context. We establish a CRISPRa mouse (dCas9a-SAM
Identifiants
pubmed: 35961968
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32485-9
pii: 10.1038/s41467-022-32485-9
pmc: PMC9374748
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic
0
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2
0
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc
0
Sulfonamides
0
venetoclax
N54AIC43PW
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4739Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Pickar-Oliver, A. & Gersbach, C. A. The next generation of CRISPR-Cas technologies and applications. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 490–507 (2019).
pubmed: 31147612
pmcid: 7079207
doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0131-5
Aoyama, T. & Chua, N. H. A glucocorticoid-mediated transcriptional induction system in transgenic plants. Plant J. 11, 605–612 (1997).
pubmed: 9107046
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1997.11030605.x
Maeder, M. L. et al. CRISPR RNA-guided activation of endogenous human genes. Nat. Methods 10, 977–979 (2013).
pubmed: 23892898
pmcid: 3794058
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2598
Mali, P. et al. CAS9 transcriptional activators for target specificity screening and paired nickases for cooperative genome engineering. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 833–838 (2013).
pubmed: 23907171
pmcid: 3818127
doi: 10.1038/nbt.2675
Perez-Pinera, P. et al. RNA-guided gene activation by CRISPR-Cas9–based transcription factors. Nat. Methods 10, 973–976 (2013).
pubmed: 23892895
pmcid: 3911785
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2600
Gilbert, L. A. et al. CRISPR-mediated modular RNA-guided regulation of transcription in eukaryotes. Cell 154, 442–451 (2013).
pubmed: 23849981
pmcid: 3770145
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.044
Chavez, A. et al. Highly efficient Cas9-mediated transcriptional programming. Nat. Methods 12, 326–328 (2015).
pubmed: 25730490
pmcid: 4393883
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3312
Gilbert, L. A. et al. Genome-Scale CRISPR-Mediated Control of Gene Repression and Activation. Cell 159, 647–661 (2014).
pubmed: 25307932
pmcid: 4253859
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.029
Konermann, S. et al. Genome-scale transcriptional activation by an engineered CRISPR-Cas9 complex. Nature 517, 583–588 (2015).
pubmed: 25494202
doi: 10.1038/nature14136
Tanenbaum Marvin, E. et al. A Protein-Tagging System for Signal Amplification in Gene Expression and Fluorescence Imaging. Cell 159, 635–646 (2014).
pubmed: 25307933
pmcid: 4252608
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.039
Ventura, A. & Dow, L. E. Modeling Cancer in the CRISPR Era. Annu. Rev. Cancer Biol. 2, 111–131 (2018).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-cancerbio-030617-050455
Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100, 57–70 (2000).
pubmed: 10647931
doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81683-9
Potts, M. A., McDonald, J. A., Sutherland, K. D. & Herold, M. J. Critical cancer vulnerabilities identified by unbiased CRISPR/Cas9 screens inform on efficient cancer Immunotherapy. Eur. J. Immunol. 50, 1871–1884 (2020).
pubmed: 33202035
doi: 10.1002/eji.202048712
Aukema, S. M. et al. Double-hit B-cell lymphomas. Blood 117, 2319–2331 (2011).
pubmed: 21119107
doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-09-297879
Johnson, N. A. et al. Lymphomas with concurrent BCL2 and MYC translocations: the critical factors associated with survival. Blood 114, 2273–2279 (2009).
pubmed: 19597184
pmcid: 2745846
doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-212191
Liu, Y., Azizian, N. G., Dou, Y., Pham, L. V. & Li, Y. Simultaneous targeting of XPO1 and BCL2 as an effective treatment strategy for double-hit lymphoma. J. Hematol. Oncol. 12, 119 (2019).
pubmed: 31752970
pmcid: 6868798
doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0803-9
Leskov, I. et al. Rapid generation of human B-cell lymphomas via combined expression of Myc and Bcl2 and their use as a preclinical model for biological therapies. Oncogene 32, 1066–1072 (2013).
pubmed: 22484426
doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.117
Pallasch, C. P. et al. Sensitizing protective tumor microenvironments to antibody-mediated therapy. Cell 156, 590–602 (2014).
pubmed: 24485462
pmcid: 3975171
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.041
Strasser, A., Harris, A. W., Bath, M. L. & Cory, S. Novel primitive lymphoid tumours induced in transgenic mice by cooperation between myc and bcl-2. Nature 348, 331–333 (1990).
pubmed: 2250704
doi: 10.1038/348331a0
Ravà M, et al. Therapeutic synergy between tigecycline and venetoclax in a preclinical model of MYC/BCL2 double-hit B cell lymphoma. Sci Transl Med 10, (2018).
Chen B-J, Fend F, Campo E, Quintanilla-Martinez L. Aggressive B-cell lymphomas—from morphology to molecular pathogenesis. Annals of Lymphoma 3, (2019).
Merino, D. et al. BH3-Mimetic Drugs: Blazing the Trail for New Cancer Medicines. Cancer Cell 34, 879–891 (2018).
pubmed: 30537511
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.11.004
Guièze, R. et al. Mitochondrial Reprogramming Underlies Resistance to BCL-2 Inhibition in Lymphoid Malignancies. Cancer Cell 36, 369–384.e313 (2019).
pubmed: 31543463
pmcid: 6801112
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.08.005
Thijssen, R. et al. Intact TP-53 function is essential for sustaining durable responses to BH3-mimetic drugs in leukemias. Blood 137, 2721–2735 (2021).
pubmed: 33824975
pmcid: 8138548
doi: 10.1182/blood.2020010167
Lois, C., Hong, E. J., Pease, S., Brown, E. J. & Baltimore, D. Germline transmission and tissue-specific expression of transgenes delivered by lentiviral vectors. Science 295, 868–872 (2002).
pubmed: 11786607
doi: 10.1126/science.1067081
Adams, J. M. et al. The c-myc oncogene driven by immunoglobulin enhancers induces lymphoid malignancy in transgenic mice. Nature 318, 533–538 (1985).
pubmed: 3906410
doi: 10.1038/318533a0
Aubrey, B. J. et al. An inducible lentiviral guide RNA platform enables the identification of tumor-essential genes and tumor-promoting mutations in vivo. Cell Rep. 10, 1422–1432 (2015).
pubmed: 25732831
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.002
Kelly, G. L. et al. Targeting of MCL-1 kills MYC-driven mouse and human lymphomas even when they bear mutations in p53. Genes Dev. 28, 58–70 (2014).
pubmed: 24395247
pmcid: 3894413
doi: 10.1101/gad.232009.113
Kotschy, A. et al. The MCL1 inhibitor S63845 is tolerable and effective in diverse cancer models. Nature 538, 477–482 (2016).
pubmed: 27760111
doi: 10.1038/nature19830
Thai, T. H. et al. Regulation of the germinal center response by microRNA-155. Science 316, 604–608 (2007).
pubmed: 17463289
doi: 10.1126/science.1141229
Low, M. S. Y. et al. IRF4 Activity Is Required in Established Plasma Cells to Regulate Gene Transcription and Mitochondrial Homeostasis. Cell Rep. 29, 2634–2645.e2635 (2019).
pubmed: 31775034
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.10.097
Michalak, E. M. et al. Puma and to a lesser extent Noxa are suppressors of Myc-induced lymphomagenesis. Cell Death Differ. 16, 684–696 (2009).
pubmed: 19148184
doi: 10.1038/cdd.2008.195
Vassilev, L. T. et al. In vivo activation of the p53 pathway by small-molecule antagonists of MDM2. Science 303, 844–848 (2004).
pubmed: 14704432
doi: 10.1126/science.1092472
Gebauer, N. et al. TP53 mutations are frequent events in double-hit B-cell lymphomas with MYC and BCL2 but not MYC and BCL6 translocations. Leuk. Lymphoma 56, 179–185 (2015).
pubmed: 24679006
doi: 10.3109/10428194.2014.907896
Strasser, A., Harris, A. W., Huang, D. C., Krammer, P. H. & Cory, S. Bcl-2 and Fas/APO-1 regulate distinct pathways to lymphocyte apoptosis. Embo j. 14, 6136–6147 (1995).
pubmed: 8557033
pmcid: 394738
doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00304.x
Ng, A. P. et al. An Erg-driven transcriptional program controls B cell lymphopoiesis. Nat. Commun. 11, 3013 (2020).
pubmed: 32541654
pmcid: 7296042
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16828-y
Zhuang, Y. et al. Altered pathways and targeted therapy in double hit lymphoma. J. Hematol. Oncol. 15, 26 (2022).
pubmed: 35303910
pmcid: 8932183
doi: 10.1186/s13045-022-01249-9
Bolomsky, A. et al. MCL-1 inhibitors, fast-lane development of a new class of anti-cancer agents. J. Hematol. Oncol. 13, 173 (2020).
pubmed: 33308268
pmcid: 7731749
doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-01007-9
Sanson, K. R. et al. Optimized libraries for CRISPR-Cas9 genetic screens with multiple modalities. Nat. Commun. 9, 5416 (2018).
pubmed: 30575746
pmcid: 6303322
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07901-8
Sánchez-Rivera, F. J. & Jacks, T. Applications of the CRISPR-Cas9 system in cancer biology. Nat. Rev. Cancer 15, 387–395 (2015).
pubmed: 26040603
pmcid: 4530801
doi: 10.1038/nrc3950
Chavez, A. et al. Comparison of Cas9 activators in multiple species. Nat. Methods 13, 563–567 (2016).
pubmed: 27214048
pmcid: 4927356
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3871
Hunt, C. et al. Tissue-specific activation of gene expression by the Synergistic Activation Mediator (SAM) CRISPRa system in mice. Nat. Commun. 12, 2770 (2021).
pubmed: 33986266
pmcid: 8119962
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22932-4
Qin, J. Y. et al. Systematic comparison of constitutive promoters and the doxycycline-inducible promoter. PLoS One 5, e10611 (2010).
pubmed: 20485554
pmcid: 2868906
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010611
Zhou, H. et al. In vivo simultaneous transcriptional activation of multiple genes in the brain using CRISPR-dCas9-activator transgenic mice. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 440–446 (2018).
pubmed: 29335603
doi: 10.1038/s41593-017-0060-6
Matharu N, et al. CRISPR-mediated activation of a promoter or enhancer rescues obesity caused by haploinsufficiency. Science 363, (2019).
Gemberling, M. P. et al. Transgenic mice for in vivo epigenome editing with CRISPR-based systems. Nat. Methods 18, 965–974 (2021).
pubmed: 34341582
pmcid: 8349887
doi: 10.1038/s41592-021-01207-2
Friedberg, J. W. How I treat double-hit lymphoma. Blood 130, 590–596 (2017).
pubmed: 28600333
doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-04-737320
Zhang, W. et al. Novel bioinformatic classification system for genetic signatures identification in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. BMC Cancer 20, 714 (2020).
pubmed: 32736575
pmcid: 7393908
doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07198-1
Uchida, A. et al. Targeting BCL2 with venetoclax is a promising therapeutic strategy for “double-proteinexpression” lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements. Haematologica 104, 1417–1421 (2019).
pubmed: 30523053
pmcid: 6601100
doi: 10.3324/haematol.2018.204958
Davids, M. S. et al. Phase I First-in-Human Study of Venetoclax in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 35, 826–833 (2017).
pubmed: 28095146
pmcid: 5455685
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.4320
Moujalled, D. M. et al. Combining BH3-mimetics to target both BCL-2 and MCL1 has potent activity in pre-clinical models of acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 33, 905–917 (2019).
pubmed: 30214012
doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0261-3
Roberts, A. W. et al. Targeting BCL2 with Venetoclax in Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med 374, 311–322 (2016).
pubmed: 26639348
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513257
DiNardo, C. D. et al. Molecular patterns of response and treatment failure after frontline venetoclax combinations in older patients with AML. Blood 135, 791–803 (2020).
pubmed: 31932844
pmcid: 7068032
doi: 10.1182/blood.2019003988
Boiko, S. et al. Targeting Bfl-1 via acute CDK9 inhibition overcomes intrinsic BH3-mimetic resistance in lymphomas. Blood 137, 2947–2957 (2021).
pubmed: 33259592
pmcid: 8160501
doi: 10.1182/blood.2020008528
Schenk, R. L. et al. Characterisation of mice lacking all functional isoforms of the pro-survival BCL-2 family member A1 reveals minor defects in the haematopoietic compartment. Cell Death Differ. 24, 534–545 (2017).
pubmed: 28085150
pmcid: 5344213
doi: 10.1038/cdd.2016.156
Tuzlak, S. et al. The BCL-2 pro-survival protein A1 is dispensable for T cell homeostasis on viral infection. Cell Death Differ. 24, 523–533 (2017).
pubmed: 28085151
pmcid: 5344212
doi: 10.1038/cdd.2016.155
Kueh, A. J. et al. An update on using CRISPR/Cas9 in the one-cell stage mouse embryo for generating complex mutant alleles. Cell Death Differ. 24, 1821–1822 (2017).
pubmed: 28753205
pmcid: 5596424
doi: 10.1038/cdd.2017.122
Herold, M. J., van den Brandt, J., Seibler, J. & Reichardt, H. M. Inducible and reversible gene silencing by stable integration of an shRNA-encoding lentivirus in transgenic rats. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18507–18512 (2008).
pubmed: 19017805
pmcid: 2587564
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806213105
Dai, Z. et al. edgeR: a versatile tool for the analysis of shRNA-seq and CRISPR-Cas9 genetic screens. F1000Res 3, 95 (2014).
pubmed: 24860646
pmcid: 4023662
McCarthy, D. J., Chen, Y. & Smyth, G. K. Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation. Nucleic Acids Res 40, 4288–4297 (2012).
pubmed: 22287627
pmcid: 3378882
doi: 10.1093/nar/gks042
Ritchie, M. E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res 43, e47 (2015).
pubmed: 25605792
pmcid: 4402510
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv007
Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. The R package Rsubread is easier, faster, cheaper and better for alignment and quantification of RNA sequencing reads. Nucleic Acids Res 47, e47 (2019).
pubmed: 30783653
pmcid: 6486549
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz114
Chen, Y., Lun, A. T. & Smyth, G. K. From reads to genes to pathways: differential expression analysis of RNA-Seq experiments using Rsubread and the edgeR quasi-likelihood pipeline. F1000Res 5, 1438 (2016).
pubmed: 27508061
pmcid: 4934518
Law, C. W., Chen, Y., Shi, W. & Smyth, G. K. voom: Precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biol. 15, R29 (2014).
pubmed: 24485249
pmcid: 4053721
doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r29
Smyth GK. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 3, Article3 (2004).
Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. J. R. Stat. Soc.: Ser. B (Methodol.) 57, 289–300 (1995).
Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).
pubmed: 16199517
pmcid: 1239896
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102
Wu, D. & Smyth, G. K. Camera: a competitive gene set test accounting for inter-gene correlation. Nucleic Acids Res 40, e133 (2012).
pubmed: 22638577
pmcid: 3458527
doi: 10.1093/nar/gks461
Bolotin, D. A. et al. MiXCR: software for comprehensive adaptive immunity profiling. Nat. Methods 12, 380–381 (2015).
pubmed: 25924071
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3364
Bullard, J. H., Purdom, E., Hansen, K. D. & Dudoit, S. Evaluation of statistical methods for normalization and differential expression in mRNA-Seq experiments. BMC Bioinforma. 11, 94 (2010).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-94
Deng Y, et al. Generation of a CRISPR activation mouse that enables modelling of aggressive lymphoma and interrogation of venetoclax resistance. GitHub, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6816211 (2022).