The Cost-Effectiveness of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel as Second-Line Therapy in Patients with Large B-Cell Lymphoma in the United States: An Economic Evaluation of the ZUMA-7 Trial.
Axicabtagene ciloleucel
Chimeric antigen T-cell therapy
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Health economics
Large B-cell lymphoma
Journal
Transplantation and cellular therapy
ISSN: 2666-6367
Titre abrégé: Transplant Cell Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101774629
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2022
11 2022
Historique:
received:
24
05
2022
revised:
03
08
2022
accepted:
06
08
2022
pubmed:
16
8
2022
medline:
8
11
2022
entrez:
15
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) was found to have superior clinical outcomes compared to standard of care (SOC; salvage chemoimmunotherapy, followed by high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell rescue for responders) for second-line large B-cell lymphoma (2L LBCL) in the pivotal ZUMA-7 trial. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of using axi-cel compared to the current standard 2L LBCL therapy. A 3-state partitioned-survival model estimated the cost effectiveness and budget impact from a payer perspective in the United States. Clinical outcomes were extrapolated based on the pivotal trial. The model calculated expected quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total costs (in United States dollars [USD], and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), along with the budget impact. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed. The proportion alive at 10 years was estimated as 48% for axi-cel and 38% for SOC; median overall survival was estimated at 59 and 24 months for axi-cel and SOC, respectively. Over a lifetime horizon, the model estimated a total of 5.56 and 7.08 QALYs for SOC and axi-cel, respectively, of which 41% and 74% were in the event-free state, respectively. Incremental QALYs and costs were 1.51 and $100,366 USD, resulting in an ICER of $66,381 USD per QALY for axi-cel versus SOC. Despite crossover to subsequent CAR T in the SOC arm, second-line CAR T use was found to improve the quality and length of life compared to SOC. Cost offsets due to subsequent CAR T use led to a limited incremental cost difference. Treatment with axi-cel is a cost-effective option that addresses an important unmet clinical need for patients with LBCL who relapse or are refractory to front-line therapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35970302
pii: S2666-6367(22)01548-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.08.010
pmc: PMC10314822
mid: NIHMS1908318
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
axicabtagene ciloleucel
U2I8T43Y7R
Receptors, Chimeric Antigen
0
Antigens, CD19
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
750.e1-750.e6Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Value Health. 2022 Jun;25(6):1010-1017
pubmed: 35667774
Lancet. 2020 Sep 19;396(10254):839-852
pubmed: 32888407
Crit Care Med. 2005 Jun;33(6):1266-71
pubmed: 15942342
J Med Econ. 2018 Dec;21(12):1238-1245
pubmed: 30260711
Med Decis Making. 2006 Jul-Aug;26(4):410-20
pubmed: 16855129
J Med Econ. 2021 Jan-Dec;24(1):458-468
pubmed: 33691581
Leuk Lymphoma. 2006 Aug;47(8):1535-44
pubmed: 16966264
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2011;2011:498-505
pubmed: 22160081
N Engl J Med. 2021 Mar 4;384(9):842-858
pubmed: 33657296
Blood Adv. 2021 Oct 26;5(20):4149-4155
pubmed: 34478487
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 28;377(26):2531-2544
pubmed: 29226797
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Nov 12;66(6):443-459
pubmed: 27618563
N Engl J Med. 2022 Feb 17;386(7):640-654
pubmed: 34891224
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 3;380(1):45-56
pubmed: 30501490
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Feb 1;2(2):e190035
pubmed: 30794298
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb 10;35(5):544-551
pubmed: 28029326
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2017 Oct;10(7):366-374
pubmed: 29263771
Value Health. 2005 Sep-Oct;8(5):521-33
pubmed: 16176491
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Apr 1;32(10):1066-73
pubmed: 24550425