Hearing Aids Mitigate Tinnitus, But Does It Matter if the Patient Receives Amplification in Accordance With Their Hearing Impairment or Not? A Meta-Analysis.
Journal
American journal of audiology
ISSN: 1558-9137
Titre abrégé: Am J Audiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9114917
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Sep 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
17
8
2022
medline:
8
9
2022
entrez:
16
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of the present meta-analysis is to explore the potential effects of objective verification of hearing aid amplification on tinnitus-related outcomes. Twenty-seven studies reporting tinnitus outcomes pre and post hearing aid fitting were identified through a systematic literature search. From these studies, data from 1,400 participants were included in the present meta-analysis. Studies were divided into subgroups based on whether they had reported performing objective verification of the participants' hearing aid amplification or not. Outcome measures were tinnitus distress and tinnitus loudness. Meta-analyses of all included studies indicated verified amplification to result in significantly enhanced reduction of tinnitus loudness ( The present meta-analysis indicates verified hearing aid amplification to be superior to unverified amplification in terms of reduction of tinnitus loudness and distress. The longitudinal increase of mitigation of tinnitus distress with verified amplification only may reflect improved neural reorganization and/or better adherence to hearing aid use, with verified compared to unverified amplification. Due to the low cost of hearing aid verification compared to the high societal cost of tinnitus, objective verification of hearing aid amplification for tinnitus patients is recommended.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35973434
doi: 10.1044/2022_AJA-22-00004
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM