Individualized Endurance Training Based on Recovery and Training Status in Recreational Runners.
Journal
Medicine and science in sports and exercise
ISSN: 1530-0315
Titre abrégé: Med Sci Sports Exerc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8005433
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 10 2022
01 10 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
18
8
2022
medline:
20
9
2022
entrez:
17
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Long-term development of endurance performance requires a proper balance between strain and recovery. Because responses and adaptations to training are highly individual, this study examined whether individually adjusted endurance training based on recovery and training status would lead to greater adaptations compared with a predefined program. Recreational runners were divided into predefined (PD; n = 14) or individualized (IND; n = 16) training groups. In IND, the training load was decreased, maintained, or increased twice a week based on nocturnal heart rate variability, perceived recovery, and heart rate-running speed index. Both groups performed 3-wk preparatory, 6-wk volume, and 6-wk interval periods. Incremental treadmill tests and 10-km running tests were performed before the preparatory period ( T0 ) and after the preparatory ( T1 ), volume ( T2 ), and interval ( T3 ) periods. The magnitude of training adaptations was defined based on the coefficient of variation between T0 and T1 tests (high >2×, low <0.5×). Both groups improved ( P < 0.01) their maximal treadmill speed and 10-km time from T1 to T3 . The change in the 10-km time was greater in IND compared with PD (-6.2% ± 2.8% vs -2.9% ± 2.4%, P = 0.002). In addition, IND had more high responders (50% vs 29%) and fewer low responders (0% vs 21%) compared with PD in the change of maximal treadmill speed and 10-km performance (81% vs 23% and 13% vs 23%), respectively. PD and IND induced positive training adaptations, but the individualized training seemed more beneficial in endurance performance. Moreover, IND increased the likelihood of high response and decreased the occurrence of low response to endurance training.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35975912
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002968
pii: 00005768-202210000-00008
pmc: PMC9473708
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1690-1701Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Sports Medicine.
Références
Meeusen R, Duclos M, Foster C, et al; European College of Sport Science; American College of Sports Medicine. Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of the overtraining syndrome: joint consensus statement of the European College of Sport Science and the American College of Sports Medicine. Med Sci Sports Exerc . 2013;45(1):186–205.
Seiler S, Haugen O, Kuffel E. Autonomic recovery after exercise in trained athletes: intensity and duration effects. Med Sci Sports Exerc . 2007;39(8):1366–73.
Flatt AA, Globensky L, Bass E, Sapp BL, Riemann BL. Heart rate variability, neuromuscular and perceptual recovery following resistance training. Sports (Basel) . 2019;7(10):225.
Nuuttila OP, Kyröläinen H, Häkkinen K, Nummela A. Acute physiological responses to four running sessions performed at different intensity zones. Int J Sports Med . 2021;42(6):513–22.
Vesterinen V, Häkkinen K, Laine T, Hynynen E, Mikkola J, Nummela A. Predictors of individual adaptation to high-volume or high-intensity endurance training in recreational endurance runners. Scand J Med Sci Sports . 2016;26(8):885–93.
Zinner C, Schäfer Olstad D, Sperlich B. Mesocycles with different training intensity distribution in recreational runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc . 2018;50(8):1641–8.
Düking P, Holmberg HC, Kunz P, Leppich R, Sperlich B. Intra-individual physiological response of recreational runners to different training mesocycles: a randomized cross-over study. Eur J Appl Physiol . 2020;120(12):2705–13.
Stellingwerff T, Heikura IA, Meeusen R, et al. Overtraining syndrome (OTS) and relative energy deficiency in sport (RED-S): shared pathways, symptoms and complexities. Sports Med . 2021;51(11):2251–80.
Halson SL. Nutrition, sleep and recovery. Eur J Sport Sci . 2008;8(2):119–26.
Ruuska PS, Hautala AJ, Kiviniemi AM, Mäkikallio TH, Tulppo MP. Self-rated mental stress and exercise training response in healthy subjects. Front Physiol . 2012;3:51.
Halson SL. Monitoring training load to understand fatigue in athletes. Sports Med . 2014;44(2 Suppl):S139–47.
da Silva DF, Ferraro ZM, Adamo KB, Machado FA. Endurance running training individually guided by HRV in untrained women. J Strength Cond Res . 2019;33(3):736–46.
Kiviniemi AM, Hautala AJ, Kinnunen H, Tulppo MP. Endurance training guided individually by daily heart rate variability measurements. Eur J Appl Physiol . 2007;101(6):743–51.
Vesterinen V, Nummela A, Heikura I, et al. Individual endurance training prescription with heart rate variability. Med Sci Sports Exerc . 2016;48(7):1347–54.
Nuuttila OP, Nikander A, Polomoshnov D, Laukkanen JA, Häkkinen K. Effects of HRV-guided vs. predetermined block training on performance, HRV and serum hormones. Int J Sports Med . 2017;38(12):909–20.
Javaloyes A, Sarabia JM, Lamberts RP, Moya-Ramon M. Training prescription guided by heart rate variability in cycling. Int J Sports Physiol Perform . 2019;14(1):23–32.
Carrasco-Poyatos M, González-Quílez A, Altini M, Granero-Gallegos A. Heart rate variability-guided training in professional runners: effects on performance and vagal modulation. Physiol Behav . 2022;244:113654.
Stanley J, Peake JM, Buchheit M. Cardiac parasympathetic reactivation following exercise: implications for training prescription. Sports Med . 2013;43(12):1259–77.
Laursen PB. Training for intense exercise performance: high-intensity or high-volume training? Scand J Med Sci Sports . 2010;20(2 Suppl):1–10.
Thamm A, Freitag N, Figueiredo P, et al. Can heart rate variability determine recovery following distinct strength loadings? A randomized cross-over trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health . 2019;16(22):4353.
Nuuttila OP, Nummela A, Häkkinen K, Seipäjärvi S, Kyröläinen H. Monitoring training and recovery during a period of increased intensity or volume in recreational endurance athletes. Int J Environ Res Public Health . 2021;18(5):2401.
Le Meur Y, Pichon A, Schaal K, et al. Evidence of parasympathetic hyperactivity in functionally overreached athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc . 2013;45(11):2061–71.
Bellenger CR, Karavirta L, Thomson RL, Robertson EY, Davison K, Buckley JD. Contextualizing parasympathetic hyperactivity in functionally overreached athletes with perceptions of training tolerance. Int J Sports Physiol Perform . 2016;11(7):685–92.
Capostagno B, Lambert MI, Lamberts RP. Standardized versus customized high-intensity training: effects on cycling performance. Int J Sports Physiol Perform . 2014;9(2):292–301.
Bellinger P, Desbrow B, Derave W, et al. Muscle fiber typology is associated with the incidence of overreaching in response to overload training. J Appl Physiol (1985) . 2020;129(4):823–36.
Bosquet L, Montpetit J, Arvisais D, Mujika I. Effects of tapering on performance: a meta-analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc . 2007;39(8):1358–65.
Nuuttila OP, Nummela A, Kyröläinen H, Laukkanen J, Häkkinen K. Physiological, perceptual, and performance responses to the 2-wk block of high- versus low-intensity endurance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc . 2022;54(5):851–60.
Helgerud J, Høydal K, Wang E, et al. Aerobic high-intensity intervals improve VO 2 max more than moderate training. Med Sci Sports Exerc . 2007;39(4):665–71.
Seiler S, Jøranson K, Olesen BV, Hetlelid KJ. Adaptations to aerobic interval training: interactive effects of exercise intensity and total work duration. Scand J Med Sci Sports . 2013;23(1):74–83.
Hooper SL, Mackinnon LT, Howard A, Gordon RD, Bachmann AW. Markers for monitoring overtraining and recovery. Med Sci Sports Exerc . 1995;27(1):106–12.
Ten Haaf T, van Staveren S, Oudenhoven E, et al. Prediction of functional overreaching from subjective fatigue and readiness to train after only 3 days of cycling. Int J Sports Physiol Perform . 2017;12(2 Suppl):S287–94.
Schäfer Olstad DS, Borgen-Johansen M, Garthe I, Paulsen G. Responsiveness of time and cost-efficient monitoring measures on triathlon training a call for individualized training monitoring. J Athl Enhanc . 2019;8(5):1–6.
Vesterinen V, Hokka L, Hynynen E, Mikkola J, Häkkinen K, Nummela A. Heart rate-running speed index may be an efficient method of monitoring endurance training adaptation. J Strength Cond Res . 2014;28(4):902–8.
Lamberts RP, Lambert MI. Day-to-day variation in heart rate at different levels of submaximal exertion: implications for monitoring training. J Strength Cond Res . 2009;23(3):1005–10.
Bosco C, Luhtanen P, Komi PV. A simple method for measurement of mechanical power in jumping. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol . 1983;50(2):273–82.
Nuuttila OP, Korhonen E, Laukkanen J, Kyröläinen H. Validity of the wrist-worn Polar Vantage V2 to measure heart rate and heart rate variability at rest. Sensors (Basel) . 2021;22(1):137.
Hopkins WG. Competitive performance of elite track-and-field athletes: variability and smallest worthwhile enhancements. Sportscience . 2005;9:17–20.
Buchheit M, Chivot A, Parouty J, et al. Monitoring endurance running performance using cardiac parasympathetic function. Eur J Appl Physiol . 2010;108(6):1153–67.
Muñoz I, Seiler S, Bautista J, España J, Larumbe E, Esteve-Lanao J. Does polarized training improve performance in recreational runners? Int J Sports Physiol Perform . 2014;9(2):265–72.
Noakes TD, Myburgh KH, Schall R. Peak treadmill running velocity during the VO 2 max test predicts running performance. J Sports Sci . 1990;8(1):35–45.
Maunder E, Seiler S, Mildenhall MJ, Kilding AE, Plews DJ. The importance of ‘durability’ in the physiological profiling of endurance athletes. Sports Med . 2021;51(8):1619–28.
Paavolainen L, Nummela A, Rusko H. Muscle power factors and VO 2 max as determinants of horizontal and uphill running performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports . 2000;10(5):286–91.
Montero D, Lundby C. Refuting the myth of non-response to exercise training: ‘non-responders’ do respond to higher dose of training. J Physiol . 2017;595(11):3377–87.
Gaskill SE, Serfass RC, Bacharach DW, Kelly JM. Responses to training in cross-country skiers. Med Sci Sports Exerc . 1999;31(8):1211–7.
Herzig D, Eser P, Omlin X, Riener R, Wilhelm M, Achermann P. Reproducibility of heart rate variability is parameter and sleep stage dependent. Front Physiol . 2018;8:1100.
Nummela A, Hynynen E, Vesterinen V. Nocturnal heart rate and heart rate variability as a method for monitoring training load. In: Kokusuz F, Ertan H, Tsolakidis E, ed. 15th Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science; 2010 Jun 23–26: Antalya (Turkey): Book of Abstracts; 2010, p. 516.
Mishica C, Kyröläinen H, Hynynen E, Nummela A, Holmberg HC, Linnamo V. Evaluation of nocturnal vs. morning measures of heart rate indices in young athletes. PLoS One . 2022;17(1):e0262333.
Vesterinen V, Nummela A, Äyramo S, et al. Monitoring training adaptation with a submaximal running test under field conditions. Int J Sports Physiol Perform . 2016;11(3):393–9.
Sangan HF, Hopker JG, Davison G, McLaren SJ. The self-paced submaximal run test: associations with the graded exercise test and reliability. Int J Sports Physiol Perform . 2021;16(12):1865–73.
Seiler S. What is best practice for training intensity and duration distribution in endurance athletes? Int J Sports Physiol Perform . 2010;5(3):276–91.