Trends in Dialysis Industry Consolidation After Medicare Payment Reform, 2006-2016.
Journal
JAMA health forum
ISSN: 2689-0186
Titre abrégé: JAMA Health Forum
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101769500
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2021
11 2021
Historique:
received:
27
06
2021
accepted:
20
09
2021
entrez:
17
8
2022
pubmed:
18
8
2022
medline:
18
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The dialysis industry is highly concentrated, with large dialysis organizations now providing dialysis for more than 85% of patients with kidney failure in the United States. In 2011, Medicare introduced a new Prospective Payment System (PPS) for end-stage kidney disease, which bundled payment for dialysis care into 1 payment per patient. Trends in dialysis facility consolidation after the PPS went into effect are unknown. To determine whether the introduction of the PPS in 2011 was associated with an acceleration in acquisitions and closures of small dialysis chains (<20 facilities) and independently owned facilities. This retrospective cohort study included all Medicare-certified independent or small chain-affiliated dialysis facilities in the continental US between 2006 and 2016. Data were obtained from Medicare and the US Renal Data System and were analyzed in 2020. The PPS. Discrete time hazard models were used to estimate the odds of acquisition and closure before the PPS (2006-2010) vs after the PPS (2011-2016). Analyses controlled for facility, market, and regional demographic characteristics. The average predicted marginal probabilities of acquisition and closure over time were estimated. The proportion of small chain-affiliated and independently owned facilities declined from 29% (1383 of 4750 facilities) in 2006 to 15% (1038 of 6738) in 2016. Among 13 481 facility-years, 6352 (47%) were for profit, and mean (SD) census was 68 (59) patients. Overall, 3286 (24%) facilities opened during the observation period. The proportion of acquisitions that occurred each year varied from 1.1% (12 of 1065 facilities in 2015) to 7.2% (86 of 1192 facilities in 2012), while closures varied from 0.8% (9 of 1065 facilities in 2015) to 2.2% (28 of 1286 facilities in 2010), making both fairly rare. There was a 3.48 higher odds of acquisition in the post-PPS period compared with the pre-PPS period (95% CI, 1.62-7.47; In this cohort study of continental US Medicare-certified dialysis facilities, small-chain and independently owned facilities retained a declining share of the dialysis market. Further research should evaluate the effect of continued dialysis market consolidation on patient access, health care utilization, and clinical outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35977264
doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.3626
pii: aoi210058
pmc: PMC8796909
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Pagination
e213626Subventions
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK097165
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright 2021 Sloan CE et al. JAMA Health Forum.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Sloan reports grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) outside the submitted work. Dr Maciejewski reports grants from NIH and the Department of Veterans Affairs, a contract from the National Committee for Quality Assurance, and ownership of Amgen stock owing to his spouse’s employment outside the submitted work. Dr Coffman reports grants from NIH and the Department of Veterans Affairs during the conduct of the study. Dr Wang reports grants from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; a contract with the National Committee for Quality Assurance; and honoraria from NIH outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
Références
Health Serv Res. 2011 Jun;46(3):747-67
pubmed: 21143480
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Dec 7;13(12):1833-1841
pubmed: 30455323
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e193987
pubmed: 31099872
Health Serv Res. 1999 Feb;33(6):1567-92
pubmed: 10029498
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Aug;174(8):1058-1064
pubmed: 34058101
Health Serv Res. 2001 Apr;36(1 Pt 2):223-51
pubmed: 11327175
Med Care Res Rev. 2011 Oct;68(5):537-58
pubmed: 21602196
Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Jun;55(6):1079-87
pubmed: 20385435
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Jun;28(6):1697-1706
pubmed: 28298324
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Mar 7;12(3):536-545
pubmed: 27831510
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 Jul;18(7):2021-7
pubmed: 17568017
Med Care Res Rev. 2021 Jun;78(3):281-290
pubmed: 32141363
Am J Kidney Dis. 2013 Oct;62(4):662-9
pubmed: 23769138
Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Oct;64(4):616-21
pubmed: 24560166
Am J Kidney Dis. 2013 Nov;62(5):849-59
pubmed: 23891356
Value Health. 2019 Jan;22(1):69-76
pubmed: 30661636
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Dec 5;9(12):2195-202
pubmed: 25189926
Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr;45(2):476-96
pubmed: 20148985
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 May;8(5):852-60
pubmed: 23085723
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Aug;72(2):178-187
pubmed: 29891194
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Mar;31(3):579-590
pubmed: 32019784
JAMA. 2007 Apr 18;297(15):1667-74
pubmed: 17440144
JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1314-1316
pubmed: 32259222
Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct;53(5):3680-3703
pubmed: 29468675