Reliable and Valid Robotic Assessments of Hand Active and Passive Position Sense in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy.
assessment
cerebral palsy
hand
proprioception
rehabilitation
robotics
Journal
Frontiers in human neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-5161
Titre abrégé: Front Hum Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477954
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
12
03
2022
accepted:
22
06
2022
entrez:
18
8
2022
pubmed:
19
8
2022
medline:
19
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Impaired hand proprioception can lead to difficulties in performing fine motor tasks, thereby affecting activities of daily living. The majority of children with unilateral cerebral palsy (uCP) experience proprioceptive deficits, but accurately quantifying these deficits is challenging due to the lack of sensitive measurement methods. Robot-assisted assessments provide a promising alternative, however, there is a need for solutions that specifically target children and their needs. We propose two novel robotics-based assessments to sensitively evaluate active and passive position sense of the index finger metacarpophalangeal joint in children. We then investigate test-retest reliability and discriminant validity of these assessments in uCP and typically developing children (TDC), and further use the robotic platform to gain first insights into fundamentals of hand proprioception. Both robotic assessments were performed in two sessions with 1-h break in between. In the passive position sense assessment, participant's finger is passively moved by the robot to a randomly selected position, and she/he needs to indicate the perceived finger position on a tablet screen located directly above the hand, so that the vision of the hand is blocked. Active position sense is assessed by asking participants to accurately move their finger to a target position shown on the tablet screen, without visual feedback of the finger position. Ten children with uCP and 10 age-matched TDC were recruited in this study. Test-retest reliability in both populations was good (intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) >0.79). Proprioceptive error was larger for children with uCP than TDC (passive: 11.49° ± 5.57° vs. 7.46° ± 4.43°,
Identifiants
pubmed: 35978982
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.895080
pmc: PMC9376476
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
895080Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Zbytniewska-Mégret, Decraene, Mailleux, Kleeren, Kanzler, Gassert, Ortibus, Feys, Lambercy and Klingels.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Cureus. 2021 Sep 18;13(9):e18075
pubmed: 34671539
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006 Jul;48(7):549-54
pubmed: 16780622
Hum Mov Sci. 2005 Apr;24(2):155-70
pubmed: 16043248
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63
pubmed: 27330520
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Apr 14;9:198
pubmed: 25926785
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Jun 29;10:316
pubmed: 27445756
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013 Jun;55(6):509-19
pubmed: 23346889
Clin Rehabil. 2009 Jan;23(1):91-5
pubmed: 19114441
J Cogn Dev. 2010 Oct 1;11(4):509-532
pubmed: 21218123
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Sep;34(9):3014-28
pubmed: 23816634
Dev Med Child Neurol. 1991 Jun;33(6):512-23
pubmed: 1864477
Acta Paediatr. 2018 Mar;107(3):462-468
pubmed: 29121418
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157
pubmed: 29435801
Dev Med Child Neurol. 1981 Oct;23(5):606-16
pubmed: 7286454
Physiother Res Int. 2001;6(2):65-75
pubmed: 11436672
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019 Sep;33(9):740-750
pubmed: 31319755
Brain Sci. 2021 Jun 03;11(6):
pubmed: 34205153
Psychol Sci. 2015 Sep;26(9):1497-510
pubmed: 26253551
Clin Interv Aging. 2017 Apr 06;12:635-643
pubmed: 28435235
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2012 Sep;16(5):475-84
pubmed: 22244966
Clin Rehabil. 2008 Aug;22(8):758-67
pubmed: 18678576
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Feb;236(2):517-527
pubmed: 29230520
Physiol Rev. 2012 Oct;92(4):1651-97
pubmed: 23073629
Gait Posture. 2010 May;32(1):10-7
pubmed: 20430623
Exp Brain Res. 1994;99(3):483-500
pubmed: 7957728
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;59(10):1033-9
pubmed: 16980142
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981 Feb;63(2):216-25
pubmed: 7462278
Cortex. 2019 Dec;121:414-426
pubmed: 31710936
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000 Dec;42(12):816-24
pubmed: 11132255
Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl. 2007 Feb;109:8-14
pubmed: 17370477
Croat Med J. 2019 Oct 31;60(5):414-420
pubmed: 31686455
J Hand Surg Am. 2008 Oct;33(8):1337-47
pubmed: 18929198
J Physiol. 2006 Mar 15;571(Pt 3):703-10
pubmed: 16439427
Dev Med Child Neurol. 1980 Aug;22(4):454-64
pubmed: 7409337
Front Neurol. 2021 Mar 15;12:623200
pubmed: 33790848
Stroke. 2019 Mar;50(3):718-727
pubmed: 30776997
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Jan 9;14(1):3
pubmed: 28069028
Brain Cogn. 2004 Jul;55(2):290-4
pubmed: 15177798
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2019 Jun;2019:441-446
pubmed: 31374669
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Jan;103(1):164-71
pubmed: 19864441
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Mar;90(3):447-53
pubmed: 19254610
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Aug;229(2):171-80
pubmed: 23756602
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2004 Nov;46(11):746-53
pubmed: 15540635
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Apr 29;16(1):53
pubmed: 31036003
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Jun 7;15(1):47
pubmed: 29880003
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Nov-Dec;29(10):933-49
pubmed: 25712470
IEEE Comput Graph Appl. 2019 Jan-Feb;39(1):64-70
pubmed: 30869599
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 May 29;3:80
pubmed: 32529042
Age (Dordr). 2012 Oct;34(5):1179-94
pubmed: 21850402
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Mar;24(3):127-35
pubmed: 19185386
Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Aug;121(8):1314-20
pubmed: 20363181
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Jun;31(6):571-582
pubmed: 28443784
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(4):335-53
pubmed: 21674387
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Jul 16;18(1):115
pubmed: 34271954
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(4):339-44
pubmed: 25144388
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 Sep;30(8):762-72
pubmed: 26747126
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Nov 13;14(1):114
pubmed: 29132388
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013 Dec;55(12):1121-8
pubmed: 23899048
Prog Brain Res. 2003;142:203-22
pubmed: 12693263