Analysis of cumulative live birth rate and perinatal outcomes in young patients with low anti-müllerian hormone levels using two ovulation promotion protocols: A cohort study.
GnRH antagonist protocol
anti-Mullerian hormone
cumulative live birth rate
in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic single sperm injection
progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol
Journal
Frontiers in endocrinology
ISSN: 1664-2392
Titre abrégé: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555782
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
07
05
2022
accepted:
15
07
2022
entrez:
22
8
2022
pubmed:
23
8
2022
medline:
24
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To compare cumulative live birth rates and perinatal outcomes of young IVF/ICSI patients with low anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels on a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) regimen with those on a high progesterone state of ovulation (PPOS) regimen. We retrospectively analyzed 798 patients who underwent At very low levels of AMH (< 0.5 ng/mL), the CLBR of the GnRH antagonist regimen was not significantly different from that of the PPOS regimen (P > 0.05), at 0.5 ng/mL ≤ AMH < 1.2 ng/mL. Statistics showed that the CLBR of the GnRH antagonist regimen was significantly higher than that of the PPOS regimen (49.7% vs. 35.7%, P=0.002). Logistic regression analysis showed that in Group A: the younger the female partner, the higher the CLBR (OR = 0.972, 95% CI = 0.923-1.042, P = 0.022), and the more the AFC, the higher the CLBR (OR = 1.166, 95% CI = 1.091-1.336, P < 0.001). Group B: the higher the number of good-quality embryos, the higher the CLBR (OR = 2.227, 95% CI = 1.869-2.654, P < 0.001). Compared with PPOS regimens, the antagonist regimen was able to increase the CLBR. The analysis of Group A showed that the antagonist regimen had a shorter TTP than the PPOS regimen (P < 0.001); however, the PPOS regimen had a lower cost of ovulation (4311.91 vs. 4903.81, P = 0.023). The antagonist regimen in Group B had a shorter TTP than the PPOS regimen, and there was no significant difference in the cost of ovulation. In the analysis of perinatal outcomes, there were no statistically significant differences in preterm birth, low birth weight, very low birth weight, and pregnancy complications among the four groups. Young patients with very low AMH levels (< 0. 5 ng/mL), the GnRH antagonist regimen was comparable to the PPOS regimen in CLBR outcomes; the antagonist regimen shortens the time to clinical pregnancy, and the PPOS regimen is more cost-effective. In young patients with low AMH levels of 0.5 ng/mL and <1.2 ng/mL, the GnRH antagonist regimen can more appropriate to improve CLBR, and the perinatal outcomes were similar for both regimens.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35992097
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.938500
pmc: PMC9389309
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hormone Antagonists
0
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone
33515-09-2
Anti-Mullerian Hormone
80497-65-0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
938500Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Li, Jia, Wang, Zhang, Ren and Guan.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):236-43
pubmed: 19144939
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 May;90(5):494-500
pubmed: 21306346
Hum Reprod Update. 2021 Jan 4;27(1):48-66
pubmed: 33016316
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(7):e14379
pubmed: 30762738
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2018 Jun;34(6):524-527
pubmed: 29258385
Nature. 2003 Apr 17;422(6933):656-8
pubmed: 12700731
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Aug 31;12:702558
pubmed: 34531825
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019 Feb;35(2):170-173
pubmed: 30324831
Hum Reprod Open. 2020 May 01;2020(2):hoaa009
pubmed: 32395637
BJOG. 2005 Nov;112(11):1529-35
pubmed: 16225574
Hum Reprod. 2016 Jan;31(1):93-9
pubmed: 26537922
Hum Reprod Update. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1):46-54
pubmed: 20667894
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 15;9(8):e104779
pubmed: 25127131
Reprod Biomed Online. 2019 May;38(5):691-698
pubmed: 30926176
Hum Reprod. 2007 Nov;22(11):2805-13
pubmed: 17872909
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Nov 22;10:796
pubmed: 31824419
Fertil Steril. 2015 Jul;104(1):62-70.e3
pubmed: 25956370
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Sep 13;12:705264
pubmed: 34589055
Hum Reprod Update. 2020 Feb 28;26(2):247-263
pubmed: 32045470
Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Apr;22(3):306-19
pubmed: 26843539