Adjuvant Intravesical Chemohyperthermia Versus Passive Chemotherapy in Patients with Intermediate-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (HIVEC-II): A Phase 2, Open-label, Randomised Controlled Trial.


Journal

European urology
ISSN: 1873-7560
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 7512719

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2023
Historique:
received: 13 04 2022
revised: 25 07 2022
accepted: 03 08 2022
medline: 15 5 2023
pubmed: 24 8 2022
entrez: 23 8 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Adjuvant intravesical chemotherapy following tumour resection is recommended for intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). To assess the efficacy and safety of adjuvant intravesical chemohyperthermia (CHT) for intermediate-risk NMIBC. HIVEC-II is an open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial of CHT versus chemotherapy alone in patients with intermediate-risk NMIBC recruited at 15 centres between May 2014 and December 2017 (ISRCTN 23639415). Randomisation was stratified by treating hospital. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to adjuvant CHT with mitomycin C at 43°C or to room-temperature mitomycin C (control). Both treatment arms received six weekly instillations of 40 mg of mitomycin C lasting for 60 min. The primary endpoint was 24-mo disease-free survival as determined via cystoscopy and urinary cytology. Analysis was by intention to treat. A total of 259 patients (131 CHT vs 128 control) were randomised. At 24 mo, 42 patients (32%) in the CHT group and 49 (38%) in the control group had experienced recurrence. Disease-free survival at 24 mo was 61% (95% confidence interval [CI] 51-69%) in the CHT arm and 60% (95% CI 50-68%) in the control arm (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, 95% CI 0.62-1.37; log-rank p = 0.8). Progression-free survival was higher in the control arm (HR 3.44, 95% CI 1.09-10.82; log-rank p = 0.02) on intention-to-treat analysis but was not significantly higher on per-protocol analysis (HR 2.87, 95% CI 0.83-9.98; log-rank p = 0.06). Overall survival was similar (HR 2.55, 95% CI 0.77-8.40; log-rank p = 0.09). Patients undergoing CHT were less likely to complete their treatment (n =75, 59% vs n = 111, 89%). Adverse events were reported by 164 patients (87 CHT vs 77 control). Major (grade III) adverse events were rare (13 CHT vs 7 control). CHT cannot be recommended over chemotherapy alone for intermediate-risk NMIBC. Adverse events following CHT were of low grade and short-lived, although patients were less likely to complete their treatment. The HIVEC-II trial investigated the role of heated chemotherapy instillations in the bladder for treatment of intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. We found no cancer control benefit from heated chemotherapy instillations over room-temperature chemotherapy. Adverse events following heated chemotherapy were low grade and short-lived, although these patients were less likely to complete their treatment.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Adjuvant intravesical chemotherapy following tumour resection is recommended for intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).
OBJECTIVE
To assess the efficacy and safety of adjuvant intravesical chemohyperthermia (CHT) for intermediate-risk NMIBC.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
HIVEC-II is an open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial of CHT versus chemotherapy alone in patients with intermediate-risk NMIBC recruited at 15 centres between May 2014 and December 2017 (ISRCTN 23639415). Randomisation was stratified by treating hospital.
INTERVENTIONS
Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to adjuvant CHT with mitomycin C at 43°C or to room-temperature mitomycin C (control). Both treatment arms received six weekly instillations of 40 mg of mitomycin C lasting for 60 min.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
The primary endpoint was 24-mo disease-free survival as determined via cystoscopy and urinary cytology. Analysis was by intention to treat.
RESULTS
A total of 259 patients (131 CHT vs 128 control) were randomised. At 24 mo, 42 patients (32%) in the CHT group and 49 (38%) in the control group had experienced recurrence. Disease-free survival at 24 mo was 61% (95% confidence interval [CI] 51-69%) in the CHT arm and 60% (95% CI 50-68%) in the control arm (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, 95% CI 0.62-1.37; log-rank p = 0.8). Progression-free survival was higher in the control arm (HR 3.44, 95% CI 1.09-10.82; log-rank p = 0.02) on intention-to-treat analysis but was not significantly higher on per-protocol analysis (HR 2.87, 95% CI 0.83-9.98; log-rank p = 0.06). Overall survival was similar (HR 2.55, 95% CI 0.77-8.40; log-rank p = 0.09). Patients undergoing CHT were less likely to complete their treatment (n =75, 59% vs n = 111, 89%). Adverse events were reported by 164 patients (87 CHT vs 77 control). Major (grade III) adverse events were rare (13 CHT vs 7 control).
CONCLUSIONS
CHT cannot be recommended over chemotherapy alone for intermediate-risk NMIBC. Adverse events following CHT were of low grade and short-lived, although patients were less likely to complete their treatment.
PATIENT SUMMARY
The HIVEC-II trial investigated the role of heated chemotherapy instillations in the bladder for treatment of intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. We found no cancer control benefit from heated chemotherapy instillations over room-temperature chemotherapy. Adverse events following heated chemotherapy were low grade and short-lived, although these patients were less likely to complete their treatment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35999119
pii: S0302-2838(22)02552-0
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.08.003
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Mitomycin 50SG953SK6
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic 0
Adjuvants, Immunologic 0

Types de publication

Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial, Phase II Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

497-504

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Wei Shen Tan (WS)

Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK. Electronic address: wei.tan@ucl.ac.uk.

Aaron Prendergast (A)

Centre for Experimental Cancer Medicine, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Charlotte Ackerman (C)

Centre for Experimental Cancer Medicine, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Yathushan Yogeswaran (Y)

Centre for Experimental Cancer Medicine, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Joanne Cresswell (J)

Department of Urology, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.

Paramananthan Mariappan (P)

Department of Urology, Edinburgh Bladder Cancer Surgery, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.

Jaspal Phull (J)

Department of Urology, Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK.

Paul Hunter-Campbell (P)

Department of Urology, University Hospital Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.

Henry Lazarowicz (H)

Department of Urology, The Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.

Vibhash Mishra (V)

Department of Urology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.

Abhay Rane (A)

Department of Urology, East Surry Hospital, Redhill, UK.

Melissa Davies (M)

Department of Urology, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, UK.

Hazel Warburton (H)

Department of Urology, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Peter Cooke (P)

Department of Urology, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK.

Hugh Mostafid (H)

Department of Urology, The Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK.

Daniel Wilby (D)

Department of Urology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK.

Robert Mills (R)

Department of Urology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.

Rami Issa (R)

Department of Urology, St George's Hospital, London, UK.

John D Kelly (JD)

Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH