X-ray attenuation of bone, soft and adipose tissue in CT from 70 to 140 kV and comparison with 3D printable additive manufacturing materials.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 08 2022
26 08 2022
Historique:
received:
27
04
2022
accepted:
18
08
2022
entrez:
26
8
2022
pubmed:
27
8
2022
medline:
31
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Additive manufacturing and 3D printing are widely used in medical imaging to produce phantoms for image quality optimization, imaging protocol definition, comparison of image quality between different imaging systems, dosimetry, and quality control. Anthropomorphic phantoms mimic tissues and contrasts in real patients with regard to X-ray attenuation, as well as dependence on X-ray spectra. If used with different X-ray energies, or to optimize the spectrum for a certain procedure, the energy dependence of the attenuation must replicate the corresponding energy dependence of the tissues mimicked, or at least be similar. In the latter case the materials' Hounsfield values need to be known exactly to allow to correct contrast and contrast to noise ratios accordingly for different beam energies. Fresh bovine and porcine tissues including soft and adipose tissues, and hard tissues from soft spongious bone to cortical bone were scanned at different energies, and reference values of attenuation in Hounsfield units (HU) determined. Mathematical model equations describing CT number dependence on kV for bones of arbitrary density, and for adipose tissues are derived. These data can be used to select appropriate phantom constituents, compare CT values with arbitrary phantom materials, and calculate correction factors for phantoms consisting of materials with an energy dependence different to the tissues. Using data on a wide number of additive manufacturing and 3D printing materials, CT numbers and their energy dependence were compared to those of the tissues. Two commercially available printing filaments containing calcium carbonate powder imitate bone tissues with high accuracy at all kV values. Average adipose tissue can be duplicated by several off-the-shelf printing polymers. Since suitable printing materials typically exhibit a too high density for the desired attenuation of especially soft tissues, controlled density reduction by underfilling might improve tissue equivalence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36028638
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18741-4
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-18741-4
pmc: PMC9418162
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
14580Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Phys Med Biol. 2020 Sep 08;65(17):175019
pubmed: 32640429
Phys Med. 2020 Nov;79:145-161
pubmed: 33321469
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1989 Nov-Dec;13(6):433-54
pubmed: 2688869
Eur Radiol. 2022 Feb;32(2):1267-1275
pubmed: 34476563
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Jul;19(4):8-12
pubmed: 29943910
Phys Med. 2017 Jun;38:111-118
pubmed: 28610691
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jan 1;18:1533033819870208
pubmed: 31514632
CJC Open. 2020 Oct 03;3(2):142-151
pubmed: 33644728
Med Phys. 2018 Oct;45(10):4600-4606
pubmed: 30144100
EJNMMI Phys. 2020 Apr 22;7(1):22
pubmed: 32323035
EJNMMI Phys. 2016 Dec;3(1):17
pubmed: 27495914
EJNMMI Phys. 2021 Apr 28;8(1):38
pubmed: 33909154
Med Phys. 2011 Feb;38(2):891-6
pubmed: 21452726
Phys Med. 2021 Sep;89:29-40
pubmed: 34343764
Med Phys. 2016 Dec;43(12):6497
pubmed: 27908164
Med Phys. 2020 Jun;47(5):2206-2211
pubmed: 32068889
Indian J Dent Res. 2017 Jan-Feb;28(1):66-70
pubmed: 28393820
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Jan 10;62(3):758-780
pubmed: 28072573
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999 Jan;81(1):143-7
pubmed: 10068022
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 7;9(1):14357
pubmed: 31591433
Phys Med. 2016 Jan;32(1):242-7
pubmed: 26508016
Med Phys. 2018 Jun 22;:
pubmed: 29933508
Insights Imaging. 2021 Jul 13;12(1):99
pubmed: 34255191
Med Phys. 2015 Jul;42(7):4116-26
pubmed: 26133612
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 3;13(10):e0204794
pubmed: 30281614
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2019 Apr;6(2):021604
pubmed: 30915385
Acad Radiol. 2018 Jan;25(1):52-65
pubmed: 29030285
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Jun;85(6):1058-62
pubmed: 27161052
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Oct 23;64(21):215005
pubmed: 31469105
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 1991 Mar;14(1):9-30
pubmed: 2029243
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Feb 24;17(3):
pubmed: 28245589
Skeletal Radiol. 2012 May;41(5):557-68
pubmed: 21932054
Med Phys. 2014 Aug;41(8):082502
pubmed: 25086556
Phys Med Biol. 2020 Dec 16;65(23):
pubmed: 32998112
Radiology. 2020 May;295(2):418-427
pubmed: 32181730
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Apr 21;62(8):3158-3174
pubmed: 28192281
Phys Med Biol. 2002 Aug 21;47(16):2907-16
pubmed: 12222854
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012 Dec;46(4):294-9
pubmed: 24900077
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Apr;212(4):808-814
pubmed: 30673337
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 11;12(1):2374
pubmed: 35149727
Phys Med. 2019 Jan;57:47-57
pubmed: 30738531
Radiographics. 2015 Nov-Dec;35(7):1965-88
pubmed: 26562233
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Nov 29;9:763960
pubmed: 34912790
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2020 Jun;43(2):701-710
pubmed: 32524450
Med Phys. 2018 Apr;45(4):1614-1621
pubmed: 29493803
Z Med Phys. 2022 Feb 24;:
pubmed: 35221154