A retrospective observational study analyzing work and study motivation based on the work environment of 15,677 Japanese clinicians in 2016.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 08 2022
31 08 2022
Historique:
received:
12
05
2022
accepted:
23
08
2022
entrez:
31
8
2022
pubmed:
1
9
2022
medline:
9
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Physicians play an active role in public health. However, there is a limit to the knowledge and experience that can be gained through hospital work alone. This was a secondary data analysis from 100,000 doctors in Japan (15,677 respondents). The results of the analysis showed that 898 (8.4%) male and 190 (6.0%) female doctors worked 60 h or more in a week. The percentage of physicians whose spouse was a physician was found to be 31.4% (male) and 61.7% (female) (p < 0.001), and the rate of full-time working clinicians was 85.7% (male) and 30.0% (female) (p < 0.001). In the univariate analysis, female's working hours were affected by childbirth and childcare experience (p < 0.001, 95% CI - 10.3 to - 8.4, with "none" as reference) and specialty certification (p < 0.001, 95% CI - 3.5 to - 1.4, with "none" as reference). In the multivariate analysis, physician's working hours were associated with sex (coefficient, - 7.4; 95% CI - 8.3 to - 6.5, with "male as reference), childbirth/childcare (coefficient, - 2.2; 95% CI - 2.9 to - 1.4, with "possession" as reference), and specialty qualification (coefficient - 4.0, 95% CI - 5.0 to - 3.0, with "possession" as reference). To summarize the results of the analysis, work/study motivation of physicians will be facilitated by ensuring adequate learning opportunities and by developing support systems and environments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36045145
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19007-9
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-19007-9
pmc: PMC9428877
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
14806Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 26;16(9):
pubmed: 31027333
Surgery. 2010 Feb;147(2):246-54
pubmed: 20109624
JAMA. 2003 Sep 3;290(9):1151-2
pubmed: 12952994
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Apr 22;173(8):657-62; discussion 663
pubmed: 23529201
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Nov;75(11):e14797
pubmed: 34482611
N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 25;374(8):713-27
pubmed: 26836220
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Nov 10;16(1):288
pubmed: 27829461
Acad Med. 2014 Nov;89(11):1446-51
pubmed: 25054423
Ann Surg. 2021 Jan 22;:
pubmed: 33491983
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 25;382(26):2514-2523
pubmed: 32579812
Health Soc Care Community. 2006 Nov;14(6):541-52
pubmed: 17059496
JAMA. 2002 Jan 16;287(3):303-6
pubmed: 11790192
N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 7;380(10):905-914
pubmed: 30855740
JAMA. 1999 Sep 1;282(9):830-2
pubmed: 10478688
Med Teach. 2014 Jan;36(1):47-61
pubmed: 24252073
J Rural Health. 2000 Spring;16(2):111-8
pubmed: 10981362
BMC Med Educ. 2014;14 Suppl 1:S8
pubmed: 25559277
JAMA. 2010 Feb 24;303(8):747-53
pubmed: 20179284
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Feb 18;10:40
pubmed: 20167075
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jun 12;28(6):1074-1080
pubmed: 33120412
J Interprof Care. 2018 Mar;32(2):127-135
pubmed: 29172791
JAMA. 2012 Jun 13;307(22):2410-7
pubmed: 22692173
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Dec;23(12):1981-6
pubmed: 18807096
Acad Med. 2003 May;78(5):500-8
pubmed: 12742788