Accuracy of palatal orthodontic mini-implants placed by conventionally or CAD/CAM-based surgical guides: a comparative in vitro study.
Digital orthodontics
Orthodontic mini-implant (OMI)
Surgical guide (SG)
Transfer accuracy
Journal
The Angle orthodontist
ISSN: 1945-7103
Titre abrégé: Angle Orthod
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370550
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 01 2023
01 01 2023
Historique:
accepted:
01
06
2022
received:
01
01
2022
pubmed:
2
9
2022
medline:
27
12
2022
entrez:
1
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate and compare the transfer accuracy of five different surgical guides (SGs) for the insertion of orthodontic mini-implants (OMIs) in the anterior palate. Stereolithographic files of 10 maxillary patient models and their corresponding lateral cephalograms were virtually matched and used for planning the position of two parallel OMIs in the paramedian region of the anterior palate. For each patient model, three 3-dimensional (3D)-printed and two conventional SGs were manufactured from different materials, and a total of 96 OMIs were transferred to the anterior palates of the respective 50 molded resin models. The planned (T0) and the actual (T1) OMI positions were analyzed and compared after superimposition of the digitized models. The deviations between the OMI positions in T0 and T1 were described as the distance between the head and the tip, respectively, of each OMI in millimeters and the deviating angle between the OMI axes for each patient and SG. The conventionally manufactured SGs of Pattern Resin LS (GC Europe N.V., Leuven, Belgium) showed the highest linear and angular transfer accuracy for the insertion of OMIs. The highest deviations were found with the SGs made of IMPRIMO LC Splint (3D-printed; Scheu-Dental, Iserlohn, Germany) and Memosil 2 (conventional SG; Kulzer, Hanau, Germany). The 3D-printed SGs did not reach the accuracy of the conventional SGs made of Pattern Resin but may provide sufficient accuracy for palatal OMI placement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36048244
pii: 485457
doi: 10.2319/011722-55.1
pmc: PMC9797149
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dental Implants
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
79-87Informations de copyright
© 2023 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc.
Références
Angle Orthod. 2016 Sep;86(5):826-31
pubmed: 26998809
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Sep;47(9):1195-1198
pubmed: 29653870
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Jul;156(1):148-156
pubmed: 31256828
Materials (Basel). 2019 Jun 19;12(12):
pubmed: 31248083
Aust Orthod J. 2015 Nov;31(2):208-15
pubmed: 26999895
J Clin Orthod. 2013 Mar;47(3):180-7
pubmed: 23660791
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 May;103(5):e6-15
pubmed: 17317235
Angle Orthod. 2012 Mar;82(2):284-93
pubmed: 21848407
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Jun;22(6):664-8
pubmed: 21044170
J Clin Orthod. 2005 Sep;39(9):539-47; quiz 531-2
pubmed: 16244412
J Clin Orthod. 2011 Aug;45(8):433-41; quiz 467
pubmed: 22094724
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Feb;145(2):165-72
pubmed: 24485730
J Clin Orthod. 2016 Jan;50(1):12-22
pubmed: 26919634
J Orofac Orthop. 2020 Sep;81(5):340-349
pubmed: 32632653
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2022 May;25(2):192-198
pubmed: 34344059