Sodium docusate as a cleaning agent for forward osmosis membranes fouled by landfill leachate wastewater.


Journal

Chemosphere
ISSN: 1879-1298
Titre abrégé: Chemosphere
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0320657

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Historique:
received: 31 05 2022
revised: 03 08 2022
accepted: 24 08 2022
pubmed: 2 9 2022
medline: 14 10 2022
entrez: 1 9 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Membrane cleaning is critical for economic and scientific reasons in wastewater treatment systems. Sodium docusate is a laxative agent and removes cerumen (ear wax). Docusate penetrates the hard ear wax, making it softer and easier to remove. The same concept could be applied to soften and remove fouling layers on the membrane surface. Once softened, the foulants can be easily flushed with water. This innovative approach can address the challenge of developing superior methods to mitigate membrane fouling and material degradation. In this study, we evaluated the efficiency of sodium docusate for cleaning fouled forward osmosis membranes with real landfill leachate wastewater. Experiments were conducted to examine the impact of dose rate, contact time, flow or static conditions, and process configuration (forward osmosis (FO) or pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) upon fouling created by landfill leachate dewatering. A remarkable (99%) flux recovery was achieved using docusate at a small concentration of only 0.1% for 30 min. Furthermore, docusate can also effectively restore flux with static cleaning without using pumps to circulate the cleaning solution. Furthermore, cleaning efficiency can be achieved at neutral pH compatible with most membrane materials. From an economic and energy-saving perspective, static cleaning can almost achieve the same cleaning efficiency as kinetic cleaning for fouled forward osmosis membranes without the expense of additional pumping energy compared to kinetic cleaning. Since pumping energy is a major contributor to the overall energy of the forward osmosis system, it can be minimized to a certain degree by using a static cleaning approach and can bring good energy savings when using larger membrane areas. Studies of the contact angle on the membrane surface indicated that the contact angle was decreased compared to the fouled membrane after cleaning (e.g. 70.3° to 63.2° or FO mode and static cleaning). Scanning Electron Microscopy revealed that the cleaning strategy was successful. Infrared Spectroscopy showed that a small amount of sodium docusate remained on the membrane surface. Docusate is more environmentally friendly than acid or alkaline solutions from an environmental perspective. Furthermore, the cleaning solution can be reused for several cycles without discarding it due to the surfactant properties of docusate.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36049636
pii: S0045-6535(22)02730-8
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136237
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Laxatives 0
Membranes, Artificial 0
Surface-Active Agents 0
Waste Water 0
Water Pollutants, Chemical 0
Water 059QF0KO0R
Dioctyl Sulfosuccinic Acid 10041-19-7
Sodium 9NEZ333N27

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

136237

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Ibrar Ibrar (I)

Centre for Green Technology, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, 15 Broadway, NSW, 2007, Australia.

Sudesh Yadav (S)

Centre for Green Technology, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, 15 Broadway, NSW, 2007, Australia.

Ali Altaee (A)

Centre for Green Technology, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, 15 Broadway, NSW, 2007, Australia. Electronic address: ali.altaee@uts.edu.au.

Javad Safaei (J)

Centre for Green Technology, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, 15 Broadway, NSW, 2007, Australia.

Akshaya K Samal (AK)

Centre for Nano and Material Science (CNMS), Jain University, India.

Senthilmurugan Subbiah (S)

Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, 781039, India.

Graeme Millar (G)

School of Chemistry, Physics and Mechanical Engineering, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, 4000, Australia.

Priyamjeet Deka (P)

Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, 781039, India.

John Zhou (J)

Centre for Green Technology, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, 15 Broadway, NSW, 2007, Australia.

Articles similaires

Animals Dietary Fiber Dextran Sulfate Mice Disease Models, Animal
Fragaria Light Plant Leaves Osmosis Stress, Physiological
Silicon Dioxide Water Hot Temperature Compressive Strength X-Ray Diffraction
Nigeria Environmental Monitoring Solid Waste Waste Disposal Facilities Refuse Disposal

Classifications MeSH