Direct identification of ALK and ROS1 fusions in non-small cell lung cancer from hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides using deep learning algorithms.
Humans
Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase
/ genetics
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
/ genetics
Deep Learning
Eosine Yellowish-(YS)
Gene Rearrangement
Hematoxylin
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
Lung Neoplasms
/ genetics
Protein-Tyrosine Kinases
/ genetics
Proto-Oncogene Proteins
/ genetics
Oncogene Proteins, Fusion
Journal
Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc
ISSN: 1530-0285
Titre abrégé: Mod Pathol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8806605
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2022
12 2022
Historique:
received:
21
03
2022
accepted:
20
07
2022
revised:
20
07
2022
pubmed:
4
9
2022
medline:
2
12
2022
entrez:
3
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and ROS oncogene 1 (ROS1) gene fusions are well-established key players in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although their frequency is relatively low, their detection is important for patient care and guides therapeutic decisions. The accepted methods used for their detection are immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay, as well as DNA and RNA-based sequencing methodologies. These assays are expensive, time-consuming, and require technical expertise and specialized equipment as well as biological specimens that are not always available. Here we present an alternative detection method using a computer vision deep learning approach. An advanced convolutional neural network (CNN) was used to generate classifier models to detect ALK and ROS1-fusions directly from scanned hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) whole slide images prepared from NSCLC tumors of patients. A two-step training approach was applied, with an initial unsupervised training step performed on a pan-cancer sample cohort followed by a semi-supervised fine-tuning step, which supported the development of a classifier with performances equal to those accepted for diagnostic tests. Validation of the ALK/ROS1 classifier on a cohort of 72 lung cancer cases who underwent ALK and ROS1-fusion testing at the pathology department at Sheba Medical Center displayed sensitivities of 100% for both genes (six ALK-positive and two ROS1-positive cases) and specificities of 100% and 98.6% respectively for ALK and ROS1, with only one false-positive result for ROS1-alteration. These results demonstrate the potential advantages that machine learning solutions may have in the molecular pathology domain, by allowing fast, standardized, accurate, and robust biomarker detection overcoming many limitations encountered when using current techniques. The integration of such novel solutions into the routine pathology workflow can support and improve the current clinical pipeline.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36057739
doi: 10.1038/s41379-022-01141-4
pii: S0893-3952(22)05500-4
pmc: PMC9708557
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase
EC 2.7.10.1
Eosine Yellowish-(YS)
TDQ283MPCW
Hematoxylin
YKM8PY2Z55
Protein-Tyrosine Kinases
EC 2.7.10.1
Proto-Oncogene Proteins
0
ROS1 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
ALK protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Oncogene Proteins, Fusion
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1882-1887Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Mar 20;36(9):911-919
pubmed: 29401004
Respirology. 2020 Sep;25(9):933-943
pubmed: 32335992
Lung Cancer. 2014 May;84(2):121-6
pubmed: 24629636
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Mar 10;30(8):863-70
pubmed: 22215748
Nat Rev Cancer. 2018 Aug;18(8):500-510
pubmed: 29777175
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2015 Apr;4(2):149-55
pubmed: 25870797
J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Nov;11(11):1891-1900
pubmed: 27343444
Lung Cancer. 2022 May;167:87-97
pubmed: 35461050
Clin Chem. 2017 Mar;63(3):751-760
pubmed: 28073897
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jul 1;5(7):1076
pubmed: 31145416
Future Oncol. 2020 Aug;16(22):1597-1606
pubmed: 32490705
J Thorac Oncol. 2018 Oct;13(10):1474-1482
pubmed: 29935306
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018 Mar;142(3):321-346
pubmed: 29355391
J Pathol Inform. 2019 Jul 23;10:24
pubmed: 31523482
J Clin Pathol. 2022 Mar;75(3):145-153
pubmed: 33875457
J Thorac Oncol. 2021 Feb;16(2):259-268
pubmed: 33334571
J Thorac Oncol. 2020 Sep;15(9):1399-1400
pubmed: 32854912
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Dec;17(12):1464-1472
pubmed: 31805526
Cancer Treat Rev. 2021 Apr;95:102178
pubmed: 33743408
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jan;22(1):132-141
pubmed: 33387492
Nat Med. 2018 Oct;24(10):1559-1567
pubmed: 30224757
J Thorac Oncol. 2020 Sep;15(9):1434-1448
pubmed: 32445813
Ann Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;29(Suppl 4):iv192-iv237
pubmed: 30285222
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 29;10(1):7275
pubmed: 32350370
J Thorac Oncol. 2018 Mar;13(3):323-358
pubmed: 29396253
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Mar 12;10:230
pubmed: 30930778
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 20;33(9):1008-14
pubmed: 25667291
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Jul 15;24(14):3334-3347
pubmed: 29636358