Editorial Commentary: Time-Zero Biomechanical Shoulder Instability Studies Are Valuable But Limited Because They Do Not Replicate Clinical Dynamics.
Journal
Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association
ISSN: 1526-3231
Titre abrégé: Arthroscopy
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8506498
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2022
09 2022
Historique:
received:
20
04
2022
accepted:
22
04
2022
entrez:
5
9
2022
pubmed:
6
9
2022
medline:
9
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Severe anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss can be very difficult to treat. A recent cadaveric, biomechanical, time-zero study compared the stability of Bankart repair with long head of the biceps brachi transfer versus conjoined tendon transfer in the scenario of 20% anteroinferior glenoid bone loss. The result is long head of the biceps tendon transfer in combination with the Bankart repair provided the best overall condition compared to Bankart repair alone, or with a conjoined tendon transfer. However, a limitation is that this does not confirm that this surgical approach would provide sufficient long-term noncontractile shoulder stability to withstand repetitive soft-tissue loading in a dynamic, clinical situation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36064276
pii: S0749-8063(22)00272-9
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.04.006
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Editorial
Comment
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2636-2637Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentOn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.