Pre-operative ribociclib plus letrozole versus chemotherapy: Health-related quality of life outcomes from the SOLTI CORALLEEN trial.
CDK 4/6 inhibitors
Luminal B breast cancer
Patient-reported outcomes
Quality of life
Ribociclib
Journal
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
ISSN: 1879-0852
Titre abrégé: Eur J Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9005373
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
received:
20
06
2022
revised:
24
07
2022
accepted:
26
07
2022
pubmed:
7
9
2022
medline:
21
9
2022
entrez:
6
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In the phase II CORALLEEN trial, patients with PAM50 luminal B early breast cancer (EBC) were randomised to neoadjuvant ribociclib plus letrozole (R + L) or chemotherapy based on anthracyclines and taxanes. Results from the primary efficacy analysis showed a similar proportion of patients with response at surgery in both groups. How health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes with R + L compare with chemotherapy in EBC setting is still unknown. Here, we report the results of the HRQoL analysis from the CORALLEEN study. A total of 106 women were randomised 1:1 to receive neoadjuvant R + L (n = 52) or chemotherapy (n = 54). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using two questionnaires: EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23. Change from baseline in the global health status, functional, and symptom scales was analysed using linear mixed-effect models, and between-treatment differences were estimated along with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). At baseline, the overall questionnaire available rate was 94.3%, and patient-reported outcomes were similar between treatment groups. At the end of the study treatment (24 weeks), patients receiving R + L showed better global health status scores with a between-treatment difference of 17.7 points (95% CI 9.2-26.2; p-value <0.001). The R + L group also presented numerically better outcomes in all functional and symptom scales. The larger between-treatment differences in symptom severity were found in fatigue (-28.9; 95% CI -38.5 to -19.3), appetite loss (-23; 95% CI -34.9 to -11.2) and systematic therapy side-effects (-11.4; 95% CI -18.3 to -4.6). Neoadjuvant R + L was associated with better HRQoL outcomes compared with chemotherapy in patients with luminal B EBC. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03248427.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36067616
pii: S0959-8049(22)00462-2
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.07.028
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Aminopyridines
0
Anthracyclines
0
Aromatase Inhibitors
0
Purines
0
Taxoids
0
Letrozole
7LKK855W8I
ribociclib
TK8ERE8P56
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03248427']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
232-242Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest statement The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: G. Villacampa: Consulting Fees (e.g. advisory boards); AstraZeneca. Other (speakers' bureaus); MSD, GSK and Pierre Fabre. C. Falato: Contracted Research; Fellowship from the Swedish Society for Medical Research. L. Paré: Receipt of Intellectual Property Rights/Patent Holder; HER2DX filing. C. Hernando: None declared. M. Arumí: Other; Roche, Eisai, MSD. C. Saura: Consulting Fees (e.g. advisory boards); Astrazeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Exact Sciences, MSD, Philips, Pierre-Fabre, Puma Biotechnology, Roche, SeaGen, Zymeworks. Other (Consultant); Astrazeneca, AX'S Consulting sprl, Byondis B.V, Eisai, Exeter Pharma, Roche, MediTech, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, PintPharma and SeaGen. G. Gomez Melis: None declared. M. Muñoz: Consulting Fees (e.g. advisory boards); Pierre Fabre. Other; Eisai, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche. M. Gil-Gil: Consulting Fees (e.g. advisory boards); AstraZeneca, Agendia. Other; Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, Pierre-Faber, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai. Y. Izarzugaza: Consulting Fees (e.g. advisory boards); Novartis. Fees for Non-CME Services Received Directly from Commercial Interest or their Agents (e.g. speakers' bureaus); Novartis, Pfizer. N. Ferrer: None declared. J. Najera-Zuloaga: None declared. A. Montaño: None declared. E. Ciruelos: Consulting Fees (e.g. advisory boards); Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, MSD, AstraZeneca, Roche, Lilly. Fees for Non-CME Services Received Directly from Commercial Interest or their Agents (e.g. speakers' bureaus); Roche, Lilly. S. González-Santiago: Consulting Fees (e.g. advisory boards); Roche, Lilly, MSD, Pharmamar, Clovis, Pfizer. Fees for Non-CME Services Received Directly from Commercial Interest or their Agents (e.g. speakers' bureaus); Novartis, GSK, MSD, Pfizer. P. Villagrasa: Fees for Non-CME Services Received Directly from Commercial Interest or their Agents (e.g. speakers' bureaus); Summit NS ESMO 2019 speaker. Other; Oncolytics. J. Gavilá: Consulting Fees (e.g. advisory boards); Lilly, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche. Other; AstraZeneca, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche. A. Prat: Salary; Pfizer, Roche, Lilly, Amgen, Novartis, MSD Oncology, Daiichi Sankyo, Guardant Health. Receipt of Intellectual Property Rights/Patent Holder; PCT/EP2016/080056: HER2 AS A PREDICTOR OF RESPONSE TO DUAL HER2 BLOCKADE IN THE ABSENCE OF CYTOTOXIC THERAPY, WO/2018/096191. Chemoendocrine score (CES) Based on PAM50 for breast cancer with positive hormone receptors with an intermediate risk of recurrence, METHODS FOR BREAST CANCER TREATMENT AND PREDICTION OF THERAPEUTIC RESPONSE (US 63/023785), HER2DX filing. Consulting Fees (e.g. advisory boards); Amgen, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, PUMA, Daiichi Sankyo, Astrazeneca, Roche, Pfizer, Boehringer, Oncolytics Biotech, Abbvie, NanoString Technologies. Contracted Research; Roche, Novartis, Incyte, Puma Biotechnology. Ownership Interest (stock, stock options, or other ownership interest excluding diversified mutual funds); Reveal Genomics. Other; Oncolytics, Daiichi Sankyo, Peptomyc SL. T. Pascual: Fees for Non-CME Services Received Directly from Commercial Interest or their Agents (e.g. speakers' bureaus); AstraZeneca, Pfizer. Consulting Fees (e.g. advisory boards); Novartis.