Spatio-temporal predictions of COVID-19 test positivity in Uppsala County, Sweden: a comparative approach.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 09 2022
07 09 2022
Historique:
received:
17
12
2021
accepted:
24
08
2022
entrez:
7
9
2022
pubmed:
8
9
2022
medline:
11
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Previous spatio-temporal COVID-19 prediction models have focused on the prediction of subsequent number of cases, and have shown varying accuracy and lack of high geographical resolution. We aimed to predict trends in COVID-19 test positivity, an important marker for planning local testing capacity and accessibility. We included a full year of information (June 29, 2020-July 4, 2021) with both direct and indirect indicators of transmission, e.g. mobility data, number of calls to the national healthcare advice line and vaccination coverage from Uppsala County, Sweden, as potential predictors. We developed four models for a 1-week-window, based on gradient boosting (GB), random forest (RF), autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and integrated nested laplace approximations (INLA). Three of the models (GB, RF and INLA) outperformed the naïve baseline model after data from a full pandemic wave became available and demonstrated moderate accuracy. An ensemble model of these three models slightly improved the average root mean square error to 0.039 compared to 0.040 for GB, RF and INLA, 0.055 for ARIMA and 0.046 for the naïve model. Our findings indicate that the collection of a wide variety of data can contribute to spatio-temporal predictions of COVID-19 test positivity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36071066
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19155-y
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-19155-y
pmc: PMC9450842
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
15176Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jan 15;804:150151
pubmed: 34623953
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 3;13(1):e0189988
pubmed: 29298320
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Apr 21;14:1485-1498
pubmed: 33907451
Nat Med. 2020 Nov;26(11):1714-1719
pubmed: 32943787
Wellcome Open Res. 2020 May 1;5:83
pubmed: 32656368
Nat Commun. 2021 May 10;12(1):2609
pubmed: 33972512
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 08;9:641253
pubmed: 33898377
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Aug;23(6):917-940
pubmed: 34347175
Int J Forecast. 2022 Apr-Jun;38(2):439-452
pubmed: 33311822
Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2020 Nov;140:110212
pubmed: 32839642
AIMS Public Health. 2021 Feb 01;8(1):124-136
pubmed: 33575412
Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2021 May;146:110861
pubmed: 33746373
Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2020 Jun;135:109853
pubmed: 32501370
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Dec 1;180(12):1665-1671
pubmed: 32870239
Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2020 Nov;140:110210
pubmed: 32843823
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Nov 29;360(1463):1991-8
pubmed: 16433088
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Jan 6;29(1):3
pubmed: 33407750
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Jan;174(1):69-79
pubmed: 32941052
J Urban Health. 2006 Nov;83(6):1041-62
pubmed: 17031568