Immunoadsorption versus double-dose methylprednisolone in refractory multiple sclerosis relapses.
Immunoadsorption
Intravenous methylprednisolone
Multiple sclerosis
Relapse
Steroids
Journal
Journal of neuroinflammation
ISSN: 1742-2094
Titre abrégé: J Neuroinflammation
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101222974
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Sep 2022
07 Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
09
06
2022
accepted:
23
08
2022
entrez:
7
9
2022
pubmed:
8
9
2022
medline:
11
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Intravenous methylprednisolone is the standard treatment for a multiple sclerosis relapse; however, this fails to improve symptoms in up to one quarter of patients. Immunoadsorption is an accepted treatment for refractory relapses, but prospective comparator-controlled studies are missing. In this observational study, patients with steroid-refractory acute multiple sclerosis relapses receiving either six courses of tryptophan-immunoadsorption or double-dose methylprednisolone therapy were analysed. Outcomes were evaluated at discharge and three months later. Immune profiling of blood lymphocytes and proteomic analysis were performed by multi-parameter flow cytometry and Olink analysis, respectively (NCT04450030). 42 patients were enrolled (methylprednisolone: 26 patients; immunoadsorption: 16 patients). For determination of the primary outcome, treatment response was stratified according to relative function system score changes ("full/best" vs. "average" vs. "worse/none"). Upon discharge, the adjusted odds ratio for any treatment response ("full/best" + "average" vs. "worse/none") was 10.697 favouring immunoadsorption (p = 0.005 compared to methylprednisolone). At follow-up, the adjusted odds ratio for the best treatment response ("full/best" vs. "average" + "worse/none") was 103.236 favouring IA patients (p = 0.001 compared to methylprednisolone). Similar results were observed regarding evoked potentials and quality of life outcomes, as well as serum neurofilament light-chain levels. Flow cytometry revealed a profound reduction of B cell subsets following immunoadsorption, which was closely correlated to clinical outcomes, whereas methylprednisolone had a minimal effect on B cell populations. Immunoadsorption treatment skewed the blood cytokine network, reduced levels of B cell-related cytokines and reduced immunoglobulin levels as well as levels of certain coagulation factors. Immunoadsorption demonstrated favourable outcomes compared to double-dose methylprednisolone. Outcome differences were significant at discharge and follow-up. Further analyses identified modulation of B cell function as a potential mechanism of action for immunoadsorption, as reduction of B cell subsets correlated with clinical improvement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36071461
doi: 10.1186/s12974-022-02583-y
pii: 10.1186/s12974-022-02583-y
pmc: PMC9450381
doi:
Substances chimiques
Methylprednisolone
X4W7ZR7023
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04450030']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
220Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Clin Med. 2019 Oct 04;8(10):
pubmed: 31590282
J Pers Med. 2021 Dec 22;12(1):
pubmed: 35055321
J Neurol. 2019 Jan;266(1):57-67
pubmed: 30377816
Brain. 2000 Jul;123 ( Pt 7):1431-41
pubmed: 10869055
Front Immunol. 2016 Jan 08;6:626
pubmed: 26779181
Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2016 Aug;22(3):799-814
pubmed: 27261683
Blood Purif. 2012;33(1-3):1-6
pubmed: 22086365
J Neuroimmunol. 2013 Sep 15;262(1-2):19-26
pubmed: 23768729
EClinicalMedicine. 2019 Nov 14;16:98-106
pubmed: 31832624
Neurology. 1998 Jun;50(6):1833-6
pubmed: 9633736
J Immunol. 2006 May 15;176(10):5890-7
pubmed: 16670296
J Neuroinflammation. 2012 Apr 26;9:80
pubmed: 22537481
J Neuroimmunol. 2001 Jul 2;117(1-2):1-8
pubmed: 11430999
J Clin Med. 2019 Dec 22;9(1):
pubmed: 31877873
BMC Neurol. 2017 Aug 7;17(1):151
pubmed: 28784102
Lancet Neurol. 2018 Feb;17(2):162-173
pubmed: 29275977
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2016 Jul;9(4):297-303
pubmed: 27366236
J Neurol. 2016 Dec;263(12):2395-2402
pubmed: 27604620
Ann Neurol. 1999 Dec;46(6):878-86
pubmed: 10589540
Sci Transl Med. 2011 Jul 27;3(93):93ra68
pubmed: 21795588
J Immunol. 2014 Jun 15;192(12):5761-75
pubmed: 24835393
Nervenarzt. 2011 Dec;82(12):1590-5
pubmed: 21667161
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2016 Feb 26;3(2):e207
pubmed: 26977423
Atheroscler Suppl. 2013 Jan;14(1):167-73
pubmed: 23357160
Lancet. 2005 Aug 13-19;366(9485):579-82
pubmed: 16099294
J Immunol Methods. 2004 Oct;293(1-2):127-42
pubmed: 15541283
J Clin Apher. 2019 Jun;34(3):171-354
pubmed: 31180581
Blood. 2002 Jul 1;100(1):353-5
pubmed: 12070050
Neurology. 2020 Oct 6;95(14):e1999-e2008
pubmed: 32727835
J Exp Med. 2012 May 7;209(5):1001-10
pubmed: 22547654
Eur Neurol. 2016;75(5-6):300-6
pubmed: 27304890
J Neuroimmunol. 2018 Nov 15;324:157-164
pubmed: 30244922
Eur J Neurol. 2005 Dec;12(12):939-46
pubmed: 16324087
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 19;376(3):221-234
pubmed: 28002679
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2009 Oct;12(4):264-72
pubmed: 20182574
Mult Scler. 2008 May;14(4):553-6
pubmed: 18562509
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 8;13(2):e0192516
pubmed: 29420590
Mult Scler. 2019 Nov;25(13):1754-1763
pubmed: 30303037