Tasks and investigated components in social cognition research among adults with alcohol use disorder: A critical scoping review.
Journal
Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors
ISSN: 1939-1501
Titre abrégé: Psychol Addict Behav
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8802734
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Dec 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
9
9
2022
medline:
20
12
2022
entrez:
8
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Social cognition research in alcohol use disorder (AUD) has accumulated over the past decades and has implications for understanding the interpersonal problems reported in this population and for improving clinical outcomes. However, recent criticism of classically used social cognition tasks calls for an evaluation of social cognition assessments in AUD. Moreover, available literature reviews focus on a restricted subset of social cognition components, leaving the outcomes and significance of studies assessing the remaining components unknown. Hence, to qualify and broaden our understanding of the available evidence and identify research perspectives, we systematically charted and critically appraised the tasks used and social cognition components investigated in AUD. We searched databases for studies comparing patients with AUD and healthy controls on behavioral social cognition assessments. We extracted the number of times specific social cognition components were investigated and the tasks assessing them. Of the 74 included records, 58 investigated emotion recognition, 14 investigated theory of mind (ToM), three investigated social perception/knowledge, and two investigated attributional biases. Most emotion recognition tasks required complex categorization, and presented unimodal static and context-free emotional stimuli among verbal labels. ToM was mostly assessed with the reading the mind in the eyes and faux-pas tests. Emotion recognition and ToM have been extensively investigated yet most tasks are multidetermined, lack ecological validity, or fail to assess the targeted ability. Conversely, social perception/knowledge and attributional biases, despite their clear relevance to AUD, are insufficiently studied. We propose concrete ways to address these issues. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Identifiants
pubmed: 36074580
pii: 2022-98396-001
doi: 10.1037/adb0000874
doi:
Types de publication
Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
999-1011Subventions
Organisme : Belgian Fund for Scientific Research (FRS-FNRS)