Sickness Presenteeism among Employees Having Workplace Conflicts-Results from Pooled Analyses in Latvia.
conflicts at work
psychosocial risk factors
sickness presenteeism
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 08 2022
24 08 2022
Historique:
received:
20
07
2022
revised:
18
08
2022
accepted:
20
08
2022
entrez:
9
9
2022
pubmed:
10
9
2022
medline:
14
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The study's objective was to investigate the associations between workplace conflicts and self-reported sickness presenteeism defined as going to work while being ill. Cross-sectional survey data pooled from four national surveys in years 2006, 2010, 2013 and 2018 with a study sample of 6368 employees (mean age 42.9 years and 52.9% females) were used. Respondents were randomly drawn from different regions and industries; therefore, the sample is representative of the working population of Latvia. The computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI) method was used to collect data at respondents' places of residence. The associations between conflicts in the workplace and presenteeism were analyzed by using binomial logistic regression and calculated as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusted (aOR) for gender, age, education, and survey year. On average, 11% of respondents reported sickness presenteeism during the last year. The odds of presenteeism significantly increased for all types of workplace conflicts, but most for conflicts with managers (OR = 2.84). The odds of presenteeism doubled for those reporting conflicts with other employees (OR = 2.19) and conflicts with customers (OR = 1.85). The odds of sickness presenteeism were significantly higher if the workplace conflicts occurred often (seven times for conflicts between managers and employees, and four times for conflicts with customers) and with other employees. Presenteeism frequency increased more than three times if respondents had more than two types of conflict at work. The results of this study show that having any type of conflict in the workplace significantly increases the frequency of sickness presenteeism, especially when conflicts are frequent or an employee has more types of conflicts in the workplace. The study results justify the need to implement targeted and effective workplace conflict management measures at the organizational level to decrease sickness presenteeism.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36078240
pii: ijerph191710525
doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710525
pmc: PMC9517808
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Dec 23;13(1):ijerph13010072
pubmed: 26703705
Saf Health Work. 2019 Jun;10(2):224-228
pubmed: 31297286
Am J Public Health. 2013 Aug;103(8):1406-11
pubmed: 23763426
BMC Public Health. 2011 May 26;11:395
pubmed: 21615940
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2011 Jun;24(2):153-65
pubmed: 21526385
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 29;18(3):
pubmed: 33572766
Stress Health. 2014 Feb;30(1):43-52
pubmed: 23824588
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Jul;161:169-77
pubmed: 27310723
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Nov;25(11):1244-7
pubmed: 20549378
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 22;11:620918
pubmed: 33551933
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Oct;63(8):2218-27
pubmed: 16782255
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2016 Sep 07;28(1):41
pubmed: 27610235
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 21;19(1):799
pubmed: 31226966
Nurs Manage. 2006 Sep;37(9):34, 37-8, 40-1
pubmed: 16983237
J Occup Environ Med. 2009 Jun;51(6):629-38
pubmed: 19448572
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009 Nov;82(10):1179-90
pubmed: 19504117
Hum Resour Health. 2018 Nov 9;16(1):59
pubmed: 30413168
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Jul;54(7):502-9
pubmed: 10846192
J Occup Environ Med. 2005 Sep;47(9):958-66
pubmed: 16155481
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 May;63(5):397-402
pubmed: 19366890
J Occup Rehabil. 2007 Sep;17(3):547-79
pubmed: 17653835
Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(5):365-78
pubmed: 19586075
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 04;19(7):
pubmed: 35410021
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2019 Sep 30;31:e26
pubmed: 31620303
Occup Med (Lond). 2020 Dec 12;70(8):564-569
pubmed: 33180107
Br Med Bull. 2019 Mar 1;129(1):69-78
pubmed: 30649219
J Occup Health Psychol. 2013 Jan;18(1):75-86
pubmed: 23276197
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2021 Sep 24;33:e30
pubmed: 34868600
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2016 Jan;89(1):103-14
pubmed: 25935460
J Occup Health Psychol. 2016 Jul;21(3):261-283
pubmed: 26550958
J Occup Environ Med. 2004 Apr;46(4):398-412
pubmed: 15076658
J Occup Environ Med. 2005 Jun;47(6):547-57
pubmed: 15951714
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 4;12(10):e0185781
pubmed: 28977041
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Sep;67(6):956-64
pubmed: 18571821
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2016;29(2):331-44
pubmed: 26670359
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2016 Sep 20;28:50
pubmed: 27660717
Am J Ind Med. 2019 Jul;62(7):580-589
pubmed: 31074084
Biopsychosoc Med. 2010 May 26;4(1):4
pubmed: 20504368
J Occup Health Psychol. 2011 Oct;16(4):483-500
pubmed: 21875212
Value Health. 2017 Mar;20(3):496-506
pubmed: 28292496